Seek Returns logo

ANET vs. QBTS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ANET and QBTS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolANETQBTS
Company NameArista Networks IncD-Wave Quantum Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyInformation Technology
GICS IndustryCommunications EquipmentSoftware
Market Capitalization165.24 billion USD5.15 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJune 6, 2014December 11, 2020
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ANET and QBTS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ANET vs. QBTS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolANETQBTS
5-Day Price Return-3.67%-17.16%
13-Week Price Return35.96%14.52%
26-Week Price Return19.79%131.69%
52-Week Price Return49.36%1,525.30%
Month-to-Date Return6.70%-12.39%
Year-to-Date Return18.95%79.29%
10-Day Avg. Volume8.29M43.94M
3-Month Avg. Volume9.86M59.32M
3-Month Volatility53.44%107.52%
Beta1.481.40

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

ANET

32.30%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
32.05%
Q3
19.58%
Median
11.77%
Q1
2.23%
Min
-11.93%

ANET’s Return on Equity of 32.30% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Communications Equipment industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

QBTS

--

Software Industry

Max
59.01%
Q3
21.98%
Median
7.15%
Q1
-11.12%
Min
-51.24%

Return on Equity data for QBTS is currently unavailable.

ANET vs. QBTS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Software industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

ANET

40.89%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
23.65%
Q3
14.32%
Median
5.31%
Q1
1.45%
Min
-12.72%

ANET’s Net Profit Margin of 40.89% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Communications Equipment industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

QBTS

-1,263.92%

Software Industry

Max
48.14%
Q3
18.23%
Median
5.60%
Q1
-9.22%
Min
-49.36%

QBTS has a negative Net Profit Margin of -1,263.92%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

ANET vs. QBTS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Software industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

ANET

43.14%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
42.27%
Q3
18.90%
Median
6.21%
Q1
2.97%
Min
-20.72%

ANET’s Operating Profit Margin of 43.14% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Communications Equipment industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

QBTS

-353.14%

Software Industry

Max
57.34%
Q3
20.60%
Median
7.84%
Q1
-8.72%
Min
-51.37%

QBTS has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -353.14%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

ANET vs. QBTS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Software industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolANETQBTS
Return on Equity (TTM)32.30%--
Return on Assets (TTM)22.45%-82.90%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)40.89%-1,263.92%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)43.14%-353.14%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)64.24%82.46%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

ANET

3.33

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
1.72
Q3
1.72
Median
1.46
Q1
1.18
Min
0.93

ANET’s Current Ratio of 3.33 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Communications Equipment industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

QBTS

20.73

Software Industry

Max
3.83
Q3
2.31
Median
1.45
Q1
1.03
Min
0.24

QBTS’s Current Ratio of 20.73 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Software industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

ANET vs. QBTS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Communications Equipment and Software industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

ANET

0.00

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
1.55
Q3
0.92
Median
0.55
Q1
0.30
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Communications Equipment industry, ANET’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

QBTS

0.15

Software Industry

Max
2.14
Q3
0.90
Median
0.29
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

QBTS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.15 is typical for the Software industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

ANET vs. QBTS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Communications Equipment and Software industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

ANET

171.78

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
181.73
Q3
113.63
Median
7.59
Q1
3.82
Min
-5.39

ANET’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 171.78 is in the upper quartile for the Communications Equipment industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

QBTS

-46.22

Software Industry

Max
67.02
Q3
19.86
Median
0.70
Q1
-12.50
Min
-53.00

QBTS has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -46.22. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

ANET vs. QBTS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Software industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolANETQBTS
Current Ratio (MRQ)3.3320.73
Quick Ratio (MRQ)2.5820.44
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.000.15
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)171.78-46.22

Growth

Revenue Growth

ANET vs. QBTS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

ANET vs. QBTS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

ANET

0.00%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
3.88%
Q3
2.75%
Median
0.93%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ANET currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

QBTS

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
0.08%
Q3
0.03%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

QBTS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

ANET vs. QBTS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Software industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

ANET

0.00%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
111.16%
Q3
55.91%
Median
28.42%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ANET has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

QBTS

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
1.32%
Q3
0.53%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

QBTS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

ANET vs. QBTS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Software industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolANETQBTS
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

ANET

51.33

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
57.30
Q3
47.92
Median
27.50
Q1
17.89
Min
13.89

A P/E Ratio of 51.33 places ANET in the upper quartile for the Communications Equipment industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

QBTS

--

Software Industry

Max
149.35
Q3
100.21
Median
47.97
Q1
26.77
Min
11.68

P/E Ratio data for QBTS is currently unavailable.

ANET vs. QBTS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Software industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

ANET

20.99

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
11.03
Q3
5.53
Median
2.20
Q1
0.99
Min
0.40

With a P/S Ratio of 20.99, ANET trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Communications Equipment industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

QBTS

231.24

Software Industry

Max
25.24
Q3
13.52
Median
8.15
Q1
4.87
Min
0.98

With a P/S Ratio of 231.24, QBTS trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Software industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

ANET vs. QBTS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Software industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

ANET

11.79

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
9.66
Q3
5.60
Median
3.73
Q1
2.67
Min
0.30

At 11.79, ANET’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Communications Equipment industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

QBTS

10.68

Software Industry

Max
30.95
Q3
14.91
Median
7.75
Q1
3.60
Min
0.38

QBTS’s P/B Ratio of 10.68 is within the conventional range for the Software industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

ANET vs. QBTS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Communications Equipment and Software industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolANETQBTS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)51.33--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)20.99231.24
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)11.7910.68
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)41.98--