ANET vs. QBTS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Company Overview

ANET dwarfs QBTS in market cap, clocking in at 116.08 billion USD—about 26.18 times the 4.43 billion USD of its counterpart.

ANET rides a wilder wave with a beta of 1.39, hinting at bigger swings than QBTS’s steadier 0.89.

Performance Comparison

This chart compares the performance of ANET and QBTS over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).

Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

Valuation Metrics Comparison

The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of ANET and QBTS based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.

• QBTS shows a negative P/E of -33.33, highlighting a year of losses with no net profit generated. Meanwhile, ANET at 38.46 has sustained positive earnings, offering a more stable earnings foundation.
• QBTS has a negative Price-to-Free Cash Flow of -84.98, indicating it’s spent more cash than it’s brought in over the past year—a cash flow shortfall that raises questions about its operational sustainability. Meanwhile, ANET at 30.67 maintains a positive cash position.

Dividend Comparison

Neither ANET nor QBTS pays dividends, suggesting both reinvest all profits into growth—likely expansion or innovation—favoring long-term value over immediate income.

Financial Strength Metrics Comparison

This section dives into the financial resilience of ANET and QBTS, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.

• ANET’s interest coverage reads “--”, suggesting interest expenses are next to nothing—think tiny debt or ultra-low rates—while QBTS at -28.05 teeters below 1.5, earnings barely clearing interest.