Seek Returns logo

ANET vs. OLED: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ANET and OLED, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolANETOLED
Company NameArista Networks IncUniversal Display Corporation
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyInformation Technology
GICS IndustryCommunications EquipmentSemiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment
Market Capitalization197.78 billion USD6.89 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateJune 6, 2014April 11, 1996
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ANET and OLED by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ANET vs. OLED: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolANETOLED
5-Day Price Return8.93%-1.66%
13-Week Price Return48.06%-7.83%
26-Week Price Return120.79%23.29%
52-Week Price Return60.34%-30.87%
Month-to-Date Return8.00%0.88%
Year-to-Date Return42.37%-0.90%
10-Day Avg. Volume7.36M0.51M
3-Month Avg. Volume9.31M0.58M
3-Month Volatility51.95%27.74%
Beta1.391.61

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

ANET

32.30%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
32.30%
Q3
20.90%
Median
9.10%
Q1
4.29%
Min
-13.50%

In the upper quartile for the Communications Equipment industry, ANET’s Return on Equity of 32.30% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

OLED

14.88%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
47.13%
Q3
23.50%
Median
9.94%
Q1
0.86%
Min
-20.69%

OLED’s Return on Equity of 14.88% is on par with the norm for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

ANET vs. OLED: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

ANET

40.89%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
23.65%
Q3
12.56%
Median
5.62%
Q1
2.50%
Min
-3.09%

ANET’s Net Profit Margin of 40.89% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Communications Equipment industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

OLED

36.95%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
52.41%
Q3
23.88%
Median
10.17%
Q1
1.21%
Min
-32.15%

A Net Profit Margin of 36.95% places OLED in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

ANET vs. OLED: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

ANET

43.14%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
25.23%
Q3
13.72%
Median
6.44%
Q1
3.00%
Min
-10.95%

ANET’s Operating Profit Margin of 43.14% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Communications Equipment industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

OLED

38.93%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
58.09%
Q3
27.54%
Median
11.18%
Q1
3.31%
Min
-28.36%

An Operating Profit Margin of 38.93% places OLED in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

ANET vs. OLED: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolANETOLED
Return on Equity (TTM)32.30%14.88%
Return on Assets (TTM)22.45%13.15%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)40.89%36.95%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)43.14%38.93%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)64.24%77.19%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

ANET

3.33

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
3.33
Q3
2.13
Median
1.55
Q1
1.15
Min
0.91

ANET’s Current Ratio of 3.33 is in the upper quartile for the Communications Equipment industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

OLED

8.05

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
6.58
Q3
4.24
Median
2.73
Q1
2.13
Min
1.02

OLED’s Current Ratio of 8.05 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

ANET vs. OLED: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Communications Equipment and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

ANET

0.00

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
1.44
Q3
0.86
Median
0.53
Q1
0.22
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Communications Equipment industry, ANET’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

OLED

0.00

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
1.09
Q3
0.48
Median
0.25
Q1
0.01
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, OLED’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

ANET vs. OLED: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Communications Equipment and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

ANET

171.78

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
55.49
Q3
34.19
Median
7.59
Q1
3.73
Min
-9.94

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 171.78, ANET demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Communications Equipment industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

OLED

1.75

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
174.00
Q3
74.71
Median
26.06
Q1
6.43
Min
-7.80

In the lower quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, OLED’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.75 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

ANET vs. OLED: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolANETOLED
Current Ratio (MRQ)3.338.05
Quick Ratio (MRQ)2.586.39
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.000.00
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)171.781.75

Growth

Revenue Growth

ANET vs. OLED: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

ANET vs. OLED: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

ANET

0.00%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
8.13%
Q3
3.29%
Median
0.94%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ANET currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

OLED

1.21%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
3.72%
Q3
1.51%
Median
0.69%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

OLED’s Dividend Yield of 1.21% is consistent with its peers in the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

ANET vs. OLED: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

ANET

0.00%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
111.16%
Q3
70.91%
Median
30.78%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ANET has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

OLED

32.83%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
205.27%
Q3
88.01%
Median
27.13%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

OLED’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 32.83% is within the typical range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

ANET vs. OLED: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolANETOLED
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%1.21%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%32.83%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

ANET

56.16

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
103.74
Q3
61.65
Median
26.20
Q1
18.12
Min
4.19

ANET’s P/E Ratio of 56.16 is within the middle range for the Communications Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

OLED

27.06

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
106.30
Q3
61.93
Median
38.96
Q1
23.71
Min
13.06

OLED’s P/E Ratio of 27.06 is within the middle range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

ANET vs. OLED: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

ANET

22.97

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
6.86
Q3
6.24
Median
2.44
Q1
1.02
Min
0.48

With a P/S Ratio of 22.97, ANET trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Communications Equipment industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

OLED

10.00

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
19.99
Q3
10.21
Median
5.23
Q1
2.88
Min
1.13

OLED’s P/S Ratio of 10.00 aligns with the market consensus for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

ANET vs. OLED: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

ANET

11.79

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
6.28
Q3
5.73
Median
3.32
Q1
2.02
Min
0.42

At 11.79, ANET’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Communications Equipment industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

OLED

4.28

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
14.22
Q3
6.94
Median
4.29
Q1
1.99
Min
0.67

OLED’s P/B Ratio of 4.28 is within the conventional range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

ANET vs. OLED: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Communications Equipment and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolANETOLED
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)56.1627.06
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)22.9710.00
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)11.794.28
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)45.9446.21