ANET vs. MU: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at ANET and MU, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
With ANET at 116.08 billion USD and MU at 107.11 billion USD, their market capitalizations sit in the same ballpark.
With betas of 1.39 for ANET and 1.21 for MU, both show similar volatility profiles relative to the overall market.
| Symbol | ANET | MU |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Arista Networks, Inc. | Micron Technology, Inc. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Computer Hardware | Semiconductors |
| CEO | Ms. Jayshree V. Ullal | Mr. Sanjay Mehrotra |
| Price | 92.43 USD | 95.84 USD |
| Market Cap | 116.08 billion USD | 107.11 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.39 | 1.21 |
| Exchange | NYSE | NASDAQ |
| IPO Date | June 6, 2014 | June 1, 1984 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of ANET and MU over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
For a detailed comparison of valuation metrics between ANET and MU, please refer to the table below.
| Symbol | ANET | MU |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 38.46 | 22.87 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 2.11 | 0.88 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 15.61 | 3.42 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 11.51 | 2.20 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 30.67 | 13.61 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 35.66 | 9.14 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 15.36 | 3.66 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 30.18 | 14.56 |
Dividend Comparison
ANET offers a 0% dividend yield, suggesting it may be reinvesting available cash back into the business for future growth, while MU provides a 0.48% dividend yield, giving investors a steady income stream.
| Symbol | ANET | MU |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.48% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of ANET and MU, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- ANET shows “--” for interest coverage, hinting at negligible interest costs, whereas MU (at 11.94) covers its interest obligations.
| Symbol | ANET | MU |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 3.93 | 3.13 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 3.31 | 1.99 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.00 | 0.31 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.00 | 0.20 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -- | 11.94 |