Seek Returns logo

ANET vs. KLAC: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ANET and KLAC, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolANETKLAC
Company NameArista Networks IncKLA Corporation
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyInformation Technology
GICS IndustryCommunications EquipmentSemiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment
Market Capitalization162.40 billion USD149.46 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateJune 6, 2014October 8, 1980
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ANET and KLAC by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ANET vs. KLAC: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolANETKLAC
5-Day Price Return-4.29%-6.87%
13-Week Price Return-4.32%29.65%
26-Week Price Return35.08%42.52%
52-Week Price Return32.98%75.99%
Month-to-Date Return-16.69%-6.16%
Year-to-Date Return18.85%80.02%
10-Day Avg. Volume9.78M1.07M
3-Month Avg. Volume8.86M1.01M
3-Month Volatility46.66%42.14%
Beta1.441.46

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

ANET

31.28%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
31.28%
Q3
24.67%
Median
13.12%
Q1
4.60%
Min
-12.73%

In the upper quartile for the Communications Equipment industry, ANET’s Return on Equity of 31.28% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

KLAC

98.15%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
49.05%
Q3
22.19%
Median
7.96%
Q1
0.99%
Min
-15.65%

KLAC’s Return on Equity of 98.15% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

ANET vs. KLAC: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

ANET

39.73%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
28.72%
Q3
14.02%
Median
5.41%
Q1
2.50%
Min
-13.11%

ANET’s Net Profit Margin of 39.73% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Communications Equipment industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

KLAC

33.83%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
52.41%
Q3
24.47%
Median
11.88%
Q1
0.60%
Min
-25.46%

A Net Profit Margin of 33.83% places KLAC in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

ANET vs. KLAC: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

ANET

42.88%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
33.69%
Q3
15.81%
Median
6.02%
Q1
3.00%
Min
-4.94%

ANET’s Operating Profit Margin of 42.88% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Communications Equipment industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

KLAC

39.86%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
58.09%
Q3
27.76%
Median
12.14%
Q1
3.29%
Min
-32.60%

An Operating Profit Margin of 39.86% places KLAC in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

ANET vs. KLAC: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolANETKLAC
Return on Equity (TTM)31.28%98.15%
Return on Assets (TTM)21.26%27.08%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)39.73%33.83%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)42.88%39.86%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)64.34%61.99%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

ANET

3.25

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
3.28
Q3
2.10
Median
1.52
Q1
1.17
Min
0.91

ANET’s Current Ratio of 3.25 is in the upper quartile for the Communications Equipment industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

KLAC

2.69

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
6.57
Q3
4.28
Median
2.86
Q1
2.22
Min
1.02

KLAC’s Current Ratio of 2.69 aligns with the median group of the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

ANET vs. KLAC: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Communications Equipment and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

ANET

0.00

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
1.44
Q3
0.96
Median
0.43
Q1
0.21
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Communications Equipment industry, ANET’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

KLAC

1.18

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
1.18
Q3
0.48
Median
0.24
Q1
0.01
Min
0.00

KLAC’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.18. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

ANET vs. KLAC: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Communications Equipment and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

ANET

171.78

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
55.49
Q3
34.19
Median
8.92
Q1
3.73
Min
-9.94

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 171.78, ANET demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Communications Equipment industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

KLAC

38.22

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
174.00
Q3
81.21
Median
22.37
Q1
6.43
Min
-7.80

KLAC’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 38.22 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

ANET vs. KLAC: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolANETKLAC
Current Ratio (MRQ)3.252.69
Quick Ratio (MRQ)2.481.85
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.001.18
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)171.7838.22

Growth

Revenue Growth

ANET vs. KLAC: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

ANET vs. KLAC: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

ANET

0.00%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
2.99%
Q3
2.30%
Median
0.91%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ANET currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

KLAC

0.65%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
3.58%
Q3
1.59%
Median
0.61%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

KLAC’s Dividend Yield of 0.65% is consistent with its peers in the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

ANET vs. KLAC: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

ANET

0.00%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
111.16%
Q3
61.16%
Median
30.78%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ANET has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

KLAC

22.67%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
211.90%
Q3
88.01%
Median
25.84%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

KLAC’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 22.67% is within the typical range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

ANET vs. KLAC: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolANETKLAC
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.65%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%22.67%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

ANET

49.29

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
74.67
Q3
56.42
Median
31.00
Q1
15.93
Min
3.89

ANET’s P/E Ratio of 49.29 is within the middle range for the Communications Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

KLAC

34.88

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
95.58
Q3
58.67
Median
34.77
Q1
25.45
Min
12.63

KLAC’s P/E Ratio of 34.88 is within the middle range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

ANET vs. KLAC: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

ANET

19.58

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
11.84
Q3
5.68
Median
2.55
Q1
1.24
Min
0.40

With a P/S Ratio of 19.58, ANET trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Communications Equipment industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

KLAC

11.80

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
18.34
Q3
10.38
Median
5.38
Q1
2.49
Min
0.32

KLAC’s P/S Ratio of 11.80 is in the upper echelon for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

ANET vs. KLAC: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

ANET

15.38

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
6.02
Q3
6.01
Median
3.83
Q1
2.41
Min
0.42

At 15.38, ANET’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Communications Equipment industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

KLAC

28.49

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
16.22
Q3
8.33
Median
4.39
Q1
1.79
Min
0.30

At 28.49, KLAC’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

ANET vs. KLAC: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Communications Equipment and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolANETKLAC
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)49.2934.88
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)19.5811.80
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)15.3828.49
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)40.8938.16