Seek Returns logo

ANET vs. JBL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ANET and JBL, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

ANET’s market capitalization of 128.76 billion USD is substantially larger than JBL’s 24.26 billion USD, indicating a significant difference in their market valuations.

With betas of 1.38 for ANET and 1.14 for JBL, both stocks show similar sensitivity to overall market movements.

SymbolANETJBL
Company NameArista Networks, Inc.Jabil Inc.
CountryUSUS
SectorTechnologyTechnology
IndustryComputer HardwareHardware, Equipment & Parts
CEOJayshree V. UllalMichael Dastoor
Price102.52 USD226.01 USD
Market Cap128.76 billion USD24.26 billion USD
Beta1.381.14
ExchangeNYSENYSE
IPO DateJune 6, 2014May 3, 1993
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ANET and JBL by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ANET vs. JBL: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

ANET

32.05%

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
123.03%
Q3
15.78%
Median
-13.44%
Q1
-119.16%
Min
-227.95%

In the upper quartile for the Computer Hardware industry, ANET’s Return on Equity of 32.05% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

JBL

38.64%

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
38.64%
Q3
17.03%
Median
8.95%
Q1
1.23%
Min
-14.34%

In the upper quartile for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, JBL’s Return on Equity of 38.64% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

ANET vs. JBL: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Computer Hardware and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

ANET

23.89%

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
30.37%
Q3
20.44%
Median
7.03%
Q1
-12.47%
Min
-31.70%

In the upper quartile for the Computer Hardware industry, ANET’s Return on Invested Capital of 23.89% signifies a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.

JBL

15.00%

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
17.24%
Q3
9.87%
Median
6.54%
Q1
1.56%
Min
-7.50%

In the upper quartile for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, JBL’s Return on Invested Capital of 15.00% signifies a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.

ANET vs. JBL: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Computer Hardware and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

ANET

40.72%

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
40.72%
Q3
10.87%
Median
4.33%
Q1
-378.64%
Min
-753.20%

A Net Profit Margin of 40.72% places ANET in the upper quartile for the Computer Hardware industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

JBL

2.02%

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
22.76%
Q3
11.04%
Median
3.80%
Q1
1.13%
Min
-8.57%

JBL’s Net Profit Margin of 2.02% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

ANET vs. JBL: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Computer Hardware and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

ANET

42.27%

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
42.27%
Q3
13.53%
Median
4.56%
Q1
-295.01%
Min
-592.84%

An Operating Profit Margin of 42.27% places ANET in the upper quartile for the Computer Hardware industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

JBL

4.08%

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
25.25%
Q3
13.73%
Median
8.22%
Q1
4.35%
Min
-0.79%

JBL’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.08% is in the lower quartile for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

ANET vs. JBL: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Computer Hardware and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolANETJBL
Return on Equity (TTM)32.05%38.64%
Return on Assets (TTM)20.86%3.10%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)23.89%15.00%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)40.72%2.02%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)42.27%4.08%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)64.09%8.86%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

ANET

3.93

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
20.73
Q3
11.54
Median
2.69
Q1
1.40
Min
0.73

ANET’s Current Ratio of 3.93 aligns with the median group of the Computer Hardware industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

JBL

0.98

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
4.10
Q3
3.23
Median
2.37
Q1
1.81
Min
0.58

JBL’s Current Ratio of 0.98 falls into the lower quartile for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

ANET vs. JBL: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Computer Hardware and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

ANET

--

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
1.36
Q3
0.67
Median
0.04
Q1
0.03
Min
0.00

Debt-to-Equity Ratio data for ANET is currently unavailable.

JBL

2.59

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
1.19
Q3
0.56
Median
0.33
Q1
0.11
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.59, JBL operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

ANET vs. JBL: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Computer Hardware and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

ANET

--

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
32.50
Q3
21.85
Median
4.98
Q1
-7.71
Min
-34.24

Interest Coverage Ratio data for ANET is currently unavailable.

JBL

28.37

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
28.37
Q3
14.25
Median
9.35
Q1
2.86
Min
-13.16

JBL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 28.37 is in the upper quartile for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

ANET vs. JBL: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Computer Hardware and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolANETJBL
Current Ratio (TTM)3.930.98
Quick Ratio (TTM)3.310.64
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)--2.59
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)--0.18
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)-0.581.73
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)--28.37

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for ANET and JBL. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

ANET vs. JBL: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

ANET vs. JBL: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

ANET vs. JBL: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

ANET

0.00%

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
9.24%
Q3
1.58%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ANET currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

JBL

0.14%

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
2.16%
Q3
0.66%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

JBL’s Dividend Yield of 0.14% is consistent with its peers in the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

ANET vs. JBL: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Computer Hardware and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

ANET

0.00%

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
193.79%
Q3
30.72%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ANET has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

JBL

6.59%

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
71.55%
Q3
25.37%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

JBL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 6.59% is within the typical range for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

ANET vs. JBL: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Computer Hardware and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolANETJBL
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.14%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%6.59%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

ANET

42.66

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
24.60
Q3
24.01
Median
20.31
Q1
18.24
Min
13.38

At 42.66, ANET’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Computer Hardware industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

JBL

43.17

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
86.58
Q3
53.54
Median
36.07
Q1
25.99
Min
12.16

JBL’s P/E Ratio of 43.17 is within the middle range for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

ANET vs. JBL: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Computer Hardware and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

ANET

1.80

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
9.77
Q3
5.18
Median
1.77
Q1
1.17
Min
0.02

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Computer Hardware industry.

JBL

2.77

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
5.22
Q3
3.27
Median
2.16
Q1
1.77
Min
0.00

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry.

ANET vs. JBL: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Computer Hardware and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

ANET

17.31

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
57.61
Q3
47.40
Median
3.37
Q1
1.56
Min
0.43

ANET’s P/S Ratio of 17.31 aligns with the market consensus for the Computer Hardware industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

JBL

0.85

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
8.50
Q3
4.95
Median
2.45
Q1
1.17
Min
0.32

In the lower quartile for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, JBL’s P/S Ratio of 0.85 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

ANET vs. JBL: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Computer Hardware and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

ANET

12.77

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
21.21
Q3
14.71
Median
9.28
Q1
3.74
Min
0.43

ANET’s P/B Ratio of 12.77 is within the conventional range for the Computer Hardware industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

JBL

19.38

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
7.53
Q3
4.63
Median
3.34
Q1
2.35
Min
0.48

At 19.38, JBL’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

ANET vs. JBL: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Computer Hardware and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolANETJBL
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)42.6643.17
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)1.802.77
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)17.310.85
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)12.7719.38
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)34.0219.41
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)39.6224.92
EV-to-Sales (TTM)17.070.91