ANET vs. HUBS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at ANET and HUBS, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
ANET dwarfs HUBS in market cap, clocking in at 116.08 billion USD—about 3.54 times the 32.76 billion USD of its counterpart.
ANET at 1.39 and HUBS at 1.79 move in sync when it comes to market volatility.
| Symbol | ANET | HUBS |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Arista Networks, Inc. | HubSpot, Inc. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Computer Hardware | Software - Application |
| CEO | Ms. Jayshree V. Ullal | Ms. Yamini Rangan |
| Price | 92.43 USD | 621.25 USD |
| Market Cap | 116.08 billion USD | 32.76 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.387 | 1.786 |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| IPO Date | June 6, 2014 | October 9, 2014 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of ANET and HUBS over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of ANET and HUBS based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- HUBS shows a negative P/E of -1402.69, highlighting a year of losses with no net profit generated. Meanwhile, ANET at 38.46 has sustained positive earnings, offering a more stable earnings foundation.
- HUBS has a negative Forward PEG of -74.96, suggesting analysts predict either a drop in earnings or no profits at all in the near future—a red flag for its growth trajectory. Meanwhile, ANET at 2.11 avoids such a pessimistic forecast.
| Symbol | ANET | HUBS |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 38.46 | -1402.69 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 2.11 | -74.96 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 15.61 | 12.03 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 11.51 | 16.16 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 30.67 | 53.77 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 35.66 | 370.00 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 15.36 | 12.04 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 30.18 | 53.82 |
Dividend Comparison
Neither ANET nor HUBS pays dividends, suggesting both reinvest all profits into growth—likely expansion or innovation—favoring long-term value over immediate income.
| Symbol | ANET | HUBS |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of ANET and HUBS, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- ANET’s interest coverage reads “--”, suggesting interest expenses are next to nothing—think tiny debt or ultra-low rates—while HUBS at -33.04 teeters below 1.5, earnings barely clearing interest.
| Symbol | ANET | HUBS |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 3.93 | 1.66 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 3.31 | 1.66 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.00 | 0.33 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.00 | 0.17 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -- | -33.04 |