ANET vs. FIS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at ANET and FIS, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
ANET dwarfs FIS in market cap, clocking in at 116.08 billion USD—about 2.79 times the 41.60 billion USD of its counterpart.
ANET at 1.39 and FIS at 1.10 move in sync when it comes to market volatility.
| Symbol | ANET | FIS |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Arista Networks, Inc. | Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Computer Hardware | Consumer Electronics |
| CEO | Ms. Jayshree V. Ullal | Ms. Stephanie L. Ferris |
| Price | 92.43 USD | 79.17 USD |
| Market Cap | 116.08 billion USD | 41.60 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.387 | 1.096 |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| IPO Date | June 6, 2014 | June 20, 2001 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of ANET and FIS over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
For a detailed comparison of valuation metrics between ANET and FIS, please refer to the table below.
| Symbol | ANET | FIS |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 38.46 | 50.67 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 2.11 | 7.02 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 15.61 | 4.08 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 11.51 | 2.77 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 30.67 | 26.36 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 35.66 | 15.35 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 15.36 | 5.19 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 30.18 | 33.51 |
Dividend Comparison
ANET pays no dividends, focusing all profits on growth, appealing to capital-gains investors. Meanwhile, FIS’s 1.87% yield rewards shareholders, showing financial confidence while supporting objectives—a contrast to ANET’s growth-only approach.
| Symbol | ANET | FIS |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 1.87% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of ANET and FIS, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- FIS’s current ratio of 0.63 dips below 1, leaving short-term liabilities larger than current assets—a scenario that could hinge on cash flow support. On the other hand, ANET at 3.93 has enough assets to handle its obligations.
- At 0.63, FIS’s quick ratio falls below 0.8, where liquid assets, minus inventory, can’t keep up with short-term bills—possibly riding on cash flow. By contrast, ANET hits 3.31, covering its bases comfortably.
- ANET posts an interest coverage of “--”, hinting at interest costs so low they’re negligible—often from scant debt or dirt-cheap rates—while FIS at 6.73 handles interest with solid earnings.
| Symbol | ANET | FIS |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 3.93 | 0.63 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 3.31 | 0.63 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.00 | 0.80 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.00 | 0.37 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -- | 6.73 |