ANET vs. CTSH: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at ANET and CTSH, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
ANET dwarfs CTSH in market cap, clocking in at 116.08 billion USD—about 2.94 times the 39.43 billion USD of its counterpart.
ANET at 1.39 and CTSH at 0.93 move in sync when it comes to market volatility.
| Symbol | ANET | CTSH |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Arista Networks, Inc. | Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Computer Hardware | Information Technology Services |
| CEO | Ms. Jayshree V. Ullal | Mr. Ravi Kumar Singisetti |
| Price | 92.43 USD | 79.99 USD |
| Market Cap | 116.08 billion USD | 39.43 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.387 | 0.928 |
| Exchange | NYSE | NASDAQ |
| IPO Date | June 6, 2014 | June 19, 1998 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of ANET and CTSH over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
For a detailed comparison of valuation metrics between ANET and CTSH, please refer to the table below.
| Symbol | ANET | CTSH |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 38.46 | 16.76 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 2.11 | 2.93 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 15.61 | 1.96 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 11.51 | 2.65 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 30.67 | 18.48 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 35.66 | 10.48 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 15.36 | 1.92 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 30.18 | 18.10 |
Dividend Comparison
ANET pays no dividends, focusing all profits on growth, appealing to capital-gains investors. Meanwhile, CTSH’s 1.53% yield rewards shareholders, showing financial confidence while supporting objectives—a contrast to ANET’s growth-only approach.
| Symbol | ANET | CTSH |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 1.53% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of ANET and CTSH, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- ANET posts an interest coverage of “--”, hinting at interest costs so low they’re negligible—often from scant debt or dirt-cheap rates—while CTSH at 55.98 handles interest with solid earnings.
| Symbol | ANET | CTSH |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 3.93 | 2.22 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 3.31 | 2.22 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.00 | 0.08 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.00 | 0.06 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -- | 55.98 |