ANET vs. CRDO: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at ANET and CRDO, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
ANET dwarfs CRDO in market cap, clocking in at 116.08 billion USD—about 11.31 times the 10.26 billion USD of its counterpart.
CRDO dances to a riskier tune, sporting a beta of 2.29, while ANET keeps it calmer at 1.39.
| Symbol | ANET | CRDO |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Arista Networks, Inc. | Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Computer Hardware | Communication Equipment |
| CEO | Ms. Jayshree V. Ullal | Mr. William J. Brennan |
| Price | 92.43 USD | 60.45 USD |
| Market Cap | 116.08 billion USD | 10.26 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.387 | 2.292 |
| Exchange | NYSE | NASDAQ |
| IPO Date | June 6, 2014 | January 27, 2022 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of ANET and CRDO over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of ANET and CRDO based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- CRDO has a notably high P/E of 1986.26, where its market price commands a steep multiple of its earnings from the past year—indicating investors are pricing in significant future potential. On the flip side, ANET at 38.46 maintains a P/E within a more standard range, tied closer to its current profitability.
- CRDO has a negative Price-to-Free Cash Flow of -424.45, indicating it’s spent more cash than it’s brought in over the past year—a cash flow shortfall that raises questions about its operational sustainability. Meanwhile, ANET at 30.67 maintains a positive cash position.
| Symbol | ANET | CRDO |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 38.46 | 1986.26 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 2.11 | 74.87 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 15.61 | 31.34 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 11.51 | 16.44 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 30.67 | -424.45 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 35.66 | 1084.70 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 15.36 | 30.47 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 30.18 | -412.74 |
Dividend Comparison
Neither ANET nor CRDO pays dividends, suggesting both reinvest all profits into growth—likely expansion or innovation—favoring long-term value over immediate income.
| Symbol | ANET | CRDO |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of ANET and CRDO, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- For ANET and CRDO, interest coverage shows as “--”, pointing to negligible interest costs—often a sign of slim debt or rock-bottom rates keeping expenses near zero.
| Symbol | ANET | CRDO |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 3.93 | 7.67 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 3.31 | 7.01 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.00 | 0.03 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.00 | 0.02 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -- | -- |