ANET vs. CLSK: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at ANET and CLSK, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
ANET dominates in value with a market cap of 116.08 billion USD, eclipsing CLSK’s 2.84 billion USD by roughly 40.87×.
CLSK carries a higher beta at 4.37, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while ANET remains steadier at 1.39.
| Symbol | ANET | CLSK |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Arista Networks, Inc. | CleanSpark, Inc. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Computer Hardware | Software - Application |
| CEO | Ms. Jayshree V. Ullal | Mr. Zachary K. Bradford CPA |
| Price | 92.43 USD | 10.11 USD |
| Market Cap | 116.08 billion USD | 2.84 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.39 | 4.37 |
| Exchange | NYSE | NASDAQ |
| IPO Date | June 6, 2014 | November 16, 2016 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of ANET and CLSK over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of ANET and CLSK based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- CLSK shows a negative P/E of -15.82, highlighting a year of losses, whereas ANET at 38.46 trades on solid profitability.
- CLSK shows a negative forward PEG of -0.10, signaling expected earnings contraction, while ANET at 2.11 maintains analysts’ projections for stable or improved profits.
- CLSK reports a negative Price-to-Free Cash Flow ratio of -2.60, showing a cash flow shortfall that could threaten its operational sustainability, while ANET at 30.67 maintains positive cash flow.
| Symbol | ANET | CLSK |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 38.46 | -15.82 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 2.11 | -0.10 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 15.61 | 5.29 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 11.51 | 1.59 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 30.67 | -2.60 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 35.66 | 60.44 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 15.36 | 5.11 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 30.18 | -2.52 |
Dividend Comparison
Neither ANET nor CLSK currently pays a dividend yield; this often indicates they are reinvesting earnings for growth, prioritizing long-term expansion over immediate cash returns to shareholders.
| Symbol | ANET | CLSK |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of ANET and CLSK, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- ANET shows “--” (minimal interest expense), but CLSK is in the red with interest coverage -144.91, signaling a net operating loss.
| Symbol | ANET | CLSK |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 3.93 | 8.67 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 3.31 | 8.67 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -- | -144.91 |