ANET vs. AUR: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at ANET and AUR, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
ANET dwarfs AUR in market cap, clocking in at 116.08 billion USD—about 10.83 times the 10.72 billion USD of its counterpart.
AUR dances to a riskier tune, sporting a beta of 2.77, while ANET keeps it calmer at 1.39.
| Symbol | ANET | AUR |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Arista Networks, Inc. | Aurora Innovation, Inc. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Computer Hardware | Information Technology Services |
| CEO | Ms. Jayshree V. Ullal | Mr. Christopher Urmson Ph.D. |
| Price | 92.43 USD | 6.06 USD |
| Market Cap | 116.08 billion USD | 10.72 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.387 | 2.772 |
| Exchange | NYSE | NASDAQ |
| IPO Date | June 6, 2014 | May 10, 2021 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of ANET and AUR over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of ANET and AUR based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- AUR shows a negative P/E of -13.36, highlighting a year of losses with no net profit generated. Meanwhile, ANET at 38.46 has sustained positive earnings, offering a more stable earnings foundation.
- AUR has a negative Price-to-Free Cash Flow of -16.83, indicating it’s spent more cash than it’s brought in over the past year—a cash flow shortfall that raises questions about its operational sustainability. Meanwhile, ANET at 30.67 maintains a positive cash position.
| Symbol | ANET | AUR |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 38.46 | -13.36 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 2.11 | 0.51 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 15.61 | 0.00 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 11.51 | 5.92 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 30.67 | -16.83 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 35.66 | -13.53 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 15.36 | 0.00 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 30.18 | -16.74 |
Dividend Comparison
Neither ANET nor AUR pays dividends, suggesting both reinvest all profits into growth—likely expansion or innovation—favoring long-term value over immediate income.
| Symbol | ANET | AUR |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of ANET and AUR, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- For ANET and AUR, interest coverage shows as “--”, pointing to negligible interest costs—often a sign of slim debt or rock-bottom rates keeping expenses near zero.
| Symbol | ANET | AUR |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 3.93 | 9.54 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 3.31 | 9.54 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.00 | 0.06 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.00 | 0.06 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -- | -- |