Seek Returns logo

AMZN vs. WFC: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated

Here’s a clear look at AMZN and WFC, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.

Company Overview

AMZN dominates in value with a market cap of 2,135.17 billion USD, eclipsing WFC’s 238.17 billion USD by roughly 8.96×.

With betas of 1.31 for AMZN and 1.12 for WFC, both show similar volatility profiles relative to the overall market.

SymbolAMZNWFC
Company NameAmazon.com, Inc.Wells Fargo & Company
CountryUSUS
SectorConsumer CyclicalFinancial Services
IndustrySpecialty RetailBanks - Diversified
CEOMr. Andrew R. JassyMr. Charles W. Scharf
Price201.12 USD73.19 USD
Market Cap2,135.17 billion USD238.17 billion USD
Beta1.311.12
ExchangeNASDAQNYSE
IPO DateMay 15, 1997June 1, 1972
ADRNoNo

Performance Comparison

This chart compares the performance of AMZN and WFC over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).

Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

Valuation Metrics Comparison

For a detailed comparison of valuation metrics between AMZN and WFC, please refer to the table below.

SymbolAMZNWFC
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)32.3412.01
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)1.610.66
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)3.283.00
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)6.971.33
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)102.6057.77
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)16.3130.50
EV-to-Sales (TTM)3.394.93
EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM)105.8294.96

Dividend Comparison

AMZN offers a 0% dividend yield, suggesting it may be reinvesting available cash back into the business for future growth, while WFC provides a 2.19% dividend yield, giving investors a steady income stream.

SymbolAMZNWFC
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%2.19%

Financial Strength Metrics Comparison

This section dives into the financial resilience of AMZN and WFC, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.

  • WFC’s current ratio of 0.25 indicates its assets may not cover near-term debts, whereas AMZN at 1.05 maintains healthy liquidity.
  • WFC posts a quick ratio of 0.25, indicating limited coverage of short-term debts from its most liquid assets—while AMZN at 0.84 enjoys stronger liquidity resilience.
SymbolAMZNWFC
Current Ratio (TTM)1.050.25
Quick Ratio (TTM)0.840.25
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.441.04
Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM)0.210.10
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)31.132.50