Seek Returns logo

AMZN vs. VIPS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AMZN and VIPS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

AMZN’s market capitalization of 2,371.81 billion USD is substantially larger than VIPS’s 37.80 billion USD, indicating a significant difference in their market valuations.

AMZN’s beta of 1.33 points to significantly higher volatility compared to VIPS (beta: 0.56), suggesting AMZN has greater potential for both gains and losses relative to market movements.

VIPS is an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), allowing U.S. investors direct exposure to its non-U.S. operations. AMZN, on the other hand, is a domestic entity.

SymbolAMZNVIPS
Company NameAmazon.com, Inc.Vipshop Holdings Limited
CountryUSCN
SectorConsumer CyclicalConsumer Cyclical
IndustrySpecialty RetailSpecialty Retail
CEOAndrew R. JassyYa Shen
Price223.41 USD14.99 USD
Market Cap2,371.81 billion USD37.80 billion USD
Beta1.330.56
ExchangeNASDAQNYSE
IPO DateMay 15, 1997March 23, 2012
ADRNoYes

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AMZN and VIPS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AMZN vs. VIPS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

AMZN

24.26%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
70.52%
Q3
29.03%
Median
10.90%
Q1
-7.86%
Min
-57.43%

AMZN’s Return on Equity of 24.26% is on par with the norm for the Specialty Retail industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

VIPS

18.88%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
70.52%
Q3
29.03%
Median
10.90%
Q1
-7.86%
Min
-57.43%

VIPS’s Return on Equity of 18.88% is on par with the norm for the Specialty Retail industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

AMZN vs. VIPS: A comparison of their ROE against the Specialty Retail industry benchmark.

Return on Invested Capital

AMZN

13.10%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
29.46%
Q3
13.75%
Median
8.05%
Q1
0.80%
Min
-17.95%

AMZN’s Return on Invested Capital of 13.10% is in line with the norm for the Specialty Retail industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

VIPS

13.41%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
29.46%
Q3
13.75%
Median
8.05%
Q1
0.80%
Min
-17.95%

VIPS’s Return on Invested Capital of 13.41% is in line with the norm for the Specialty Retail industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

AMZN vs. VIPS: A comparison of their ROIC against the Specialty Retail industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin

AMZN

10.14%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
19.78%
Q3
8.49%
Median
3.43%
Q1
-0.69%
Min
-9.88%

A Net Profit Margin of 10.14% places AMZN in the upper quartile for the Specialty Retail industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

VIPS

6.88%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
19.78%
Q3
8.49%
Median
3.43%
Q1
-0.69%
Min
-9.88%

VIPS’s Net Profit Margin of 6.88% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Specialty Retail industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

AMZN vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against the Specialty Retail industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin

AMZN

11.02%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
24.47%
Q3
11.10%
Median
5.85%
Q1
0.66%
Min
-12.62%

AMZN’s Operating Profit Margin of 11.02% is around the midpoint for the Specialty Retail industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

VIPS

8.12%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
24.47%
Q3
11.10%
Median
5.85%
Q1
0.66%
Min
-12.62%

VIPS’s Operating Profit Margin of 8.12% is around the midpoint for the Specialty Retail industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

AMZN vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Operating Margin against the Specialty Retail industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAMZNVIPS
Return on Equity (TTM)24.26%18.88%
Return on Assets (TTM)10.25%9.88%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)13.10%13.41%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)10.14%6.88%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)11.02%8.12%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)49.16%23.36%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

AMZN

1.05

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
3.24
Q3
1.99
Median
1.42
Q1
1.02
Min
0.54

AMZN’s Current Ratio of 1.05 aligns with the median group of the Specialty Retail industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

VIPS

1.28

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
3.24
Q3
1.99
Median
1.42
Q1
1.02
Min
0.54

VIPS’s Current Ratio of 1.28 aligns with the median group of the Specialty Retail industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

AMZN vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Current Ratio against the Specialty Retail industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

AMZN

0.44

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
2.72
Q3
1.42
Median
0.87
Q1
0.35
Min
0.01

AMZN’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.44 is typical for the Specialty Retail industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

VIPS

0.13

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
2.72
Q3
1.42
Median
0.87
Q1
0.35
Min
0.01

Falling into the lower quartile for the Specialty Retail industry, VIPS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.13 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

AMZN vs. VIPS: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against the Specialty Retail industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio

AMZN

31.13

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
37.34
Q3
17.19
Median
4.28
Q1
0.11
Min
-23.60

AMZN’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 31.13 is in the upper quartile for the Specialty Retail industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

VIPS

151.50

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
37.34
Q3
17.19
Median
4.28
Q1
0.11
Min
-23.60

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 151.50, VIPS demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Specialty Retail industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

AMZN vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against the Specialty Retail industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAMZNVIPS
Current Ratio (TTM)1.051.28
Quick Ratio (TTM)0.841.14
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.440.13
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.210.07
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)0.50-2.44
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)31.13151.50

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for AMZN and VIPS. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

AMZN vs. VIPS: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

AMZN vs. VIPS: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

AMZN vs. VIPS: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

AMZN

0.00%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
5.54%
Q3
1.52%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AMZN currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

VIPS

3.20%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
5.54%
Q3
1.52%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 3.20%, VIPS offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Specialty Retail industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

AMZN vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against the Specialty Retail industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio

AMZN

0.00%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
177.64%
Q3
9.49%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AMZN has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

VIPS

0.00%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
177.64%
Q3
9.49%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

VIPS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

AMZN vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against the Specialty Retail industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAMZNVIPS
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%3.20%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

AMZN

35.92

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
81.45
Q3
42.51
Median
25.40
Q1
12.72
Min
1.88

AMZN’s P/E Ratio of 35.92 is within the middle range for the Specialty Retail industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

VIPS

7.48

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
81.45
Q3
42.51
Median
25.40
Q1
12.72
Min
1.88

In the lower quartile for the Specialty Retail industry, VIPS’s P/E Ratio of 7.48 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

AMZN vs. VIPS: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against the Specialty Retail industry benchmark.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

AMZN

1.72

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
5.90
Q3
2.79
Median
1.76
Q1
0.69
Min
0.00

AMZN’s Forward PEG Ratio of 1.72 is within the middle range of its peers in the Specialty Retail industry. This suggests a reasonable balance between the stock’s price and its expected growth, aligning with sector valuation norms.

VIPS

-0.07

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
5.90
Q3
2.79
Median
1.76
Q1
0.69
Min
0.00

VIPS has a negative Forward PEG Ratio of -0.07. This typically results from negative earnings or forecasts of declining future earnings, making the ratio not meaningful for valuation.

AMZN vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against the Specialty Retail industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

AMZN

3.65

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
5.26
Q3
2.60
Median
1.29
Q1
0.41
Min
0.06

AMZN’s P/S Ratio of 3.65 is in the upper echelon for the Specialty Retail industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

VIPS

2.53

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
5.26
Q3
2.60
Median
1.29
Q1
0.41
Min
0.06

VIPS’s P/S Ratio of 2.53 aligns with the market consensus for the Specialty Retail industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

AMZN vs. VIPS: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against the Specialty Retail industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio

AMZN

7.74

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
12.73
Q3
6.96
Median
3.28
Q1
1.42
Min
0.24

AMZN’s P/B Ratio of 7.74 is in the upper tier for the Specialty Retail industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

VIPS

1.37

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
12.73
Q3
6.96
Median
3.28
Q1
1.42
Min
0.24

VIPS’s P/B Ratio of 1.37 is in the lower quartile for the Specialty Retail industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

AMZN vs. VIPS: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against the Specialty Retail industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAMZNVIPS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)35.927.48
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)1.72-0.07
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)3.652.53
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)7.741.37
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)113.97--
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)18.0725.99
EV-to-Sales (TTM)3.752.31