AMZN vs. SW: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on October 12, 2025

Here’s a clear look at AMZN and SW, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Symbol	AMZN	SW
Company Name	Amazon.com, Inc.	Smurfit Westrock Plc
Country	United States	Ireland
GICS Sector	Consumer Discretionary	Materials
GICS Industry	Broadline Retail	Containers & Packaging
Market Capitalization	2,401.95 billion USD	22.61 billion USD
Exchange	NasdaqGS	NYSE
Listing Date	May 15, 1997	June 17, 2008
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AMZN and SW by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AMZN vs. SW: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	AMZN	SW
5-Day Price Return	1.26%	3.39%
13-Week Price Return	1.20%	-8.34%
26-Week Price Return	26.24%	1.38%
52-Week Price Return	24.57%	-6.78%
Month-to-Date Return	2.57%	1.71%
Year-to-Date Return	2.66%	-19.61%
10-Day Avg. Volume	43.69M	4.59M
3-Month Avg. Volume	42.45M	4.02M
3-Month Volatility	27.89%	32.48%
Beta	1.37	1.05

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

AMZN

23.84%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max: 47.53%
Q3: 31.20%
Median: 16.63%
Q1: 10.81%
Min: -7.57%

AMZN’s Return on Equity of 23.84% is on par with the norm for the Broadline Retail industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

SW

2.94%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 36.99%
Q3: 19.86%
Median: 10.47%
Q1: 6.76%
Min: -0.20%

SW’s Return on Equity of 2.94% is in the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

AMZN vs. SW: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

AMZN

10.54%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max: 24.63%
Q3: 12.77%
Median: 8.63%
Q1: 4.50%
Min: -1.62%

AMZN’s Net Profit Margin of 10.54% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Broadline Retail industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

SW

1.18%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 10.84%
Q3: 8.25%
Median: 4.91%
Q1: 3.65%
Min: -0.12%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry, SW’s Net Profit Margin of 1.18% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

AMZN vs. SW: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

AMZN

11.37%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max: 27.48%
Q3: 17.60%
Median: 10.82%
Q1: 7.76%
Min: -6.73%

AMZN’s Operating Profit Margin of 11.37% is around the midpoint for the Broadline Retail industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

SW

4.20%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 22.03%
Q3: 13.09%
Median: 8.06%
Q1: 6.46%
Min: -0.07%

SW’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.20% is in the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

AMZN vs. SW: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	AMZN	SW
Return on Equity (TTM)	23.84%	2.94%
Return on Assets (TTM)	11.14%	1.17%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	10.54%	1.18%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	11.37%	4.20%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	49.61%	19.46%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

AMZN

1.02

Broadline Retail Industry

Max: 3.54
Q3: 2.42
Median: 1.38
Q1: 1.20
Min: 0.69

AMZN’s Current Ratio of 1.02 falls into the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

SW

1.45

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 1.96
Q3: 1.45
Median: 1.33
Q1: 1.09
Min: 0.87

SW’s Current Ratio of 1.45 aligns with the median group of the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

AMZN vs. SW: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Broadline Retail and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

AMZN

0.15

Broadline Retail Industry

Max: 2.01
Q3: 1.31
Median: 0.72
Q1: 0.32
Min: 0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, AMZN’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.15 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

SW

0.79

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 4.15
Q3: 2.03
Median: 1.20
Q1: 0.53
Min: 0.23

SW’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.79 is typical for the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

AMZN vs. SW: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Broadline Retail and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

AMZN

0.62

Broadline Retail Industry

Max: 37.34
Q3: 21.16
Median: 8.60
Q1: 3.22
Min: -19.29

AMZN’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 0.62 is a critical concern. A value below 1.0 means operating earnings are insufficient to cover interest expenses, indicating severe financial strain and high default risk.

SW

2.41

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 13.16
Q3: 8.10
Median: 3.38
Q1: 2.83
Min: 1.06

In the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry, SW’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.41 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

AMZN vs. SW: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	AMZN	SW
Current Ratio (MRQ)	1.02	1.45
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	0.81	0.95
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	0.15	0.79
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	0.62	2.41

Growth

Revenue Growth

AMZN vs. SW: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

AMZN vs. SW: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

AMZN

0.00%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max: 4.06%
Q3: 2.07%
Median: 0.37%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

AMZN currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

SW

3.39%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 7.14%
Q3: 4.65%
Median: 3.69%
Q1: 2.00%
Min: 0.00%

SW’s Dividend Yield of 3.39% is consistent with its peers in the Containers & Packaging industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

AMZN vs. SW: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

AMZN

0.00%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max: 114.82%
Q3: 62.39%
Median: 28.55%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

AMZN has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

SW

85.87%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 222.75%
Q3: 132.16%
Median: 65.79%
Q1: 28.53%
Min: 0.00%

SW’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 85.87% is within the typical range for the Containers & Packaging industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

AMZN vs. SW: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	AMZN	SW
Dividend Yield (TTM)	0.00%	3.39%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	0.00%	85.87%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

AMZN

33.41

Broadline Retail Industry

Max: 62.76
Q3: 32.50
Median: 17.65
Q1: 12.08
Min: 6.87

A P/E Ratio of 33.41 places AMZN in the upper quartile for the Broadline Retail industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

SW

42.93

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 24.22
Q3: 20.28
Median: 17.07
Q1: 15.06
Min: 7.79

At 42.93, SW’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Containers & Packaging industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

AMZN vs. SW: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

AMZN

3.52

Broadline Retail Industry

Max: 5.19
Q3: 3.25
Median: 2.13
Q1: 1.01
Min: 0.21

AMZN’s P/S Ratio of 3.52 is in the upper echelon for the Broadline Retail industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

SW

0.51

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 1.99
Q3: 1.17
Median: 0.94
Q1: 0.55
Min: 0.31

In the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry, SW’s P/S Ratio of 0.51 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

AMZN vs. SW: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

AMZN

6.98

Broadline Retail Industry

Max: 8.81
Q3: 5.19
Median: 3.42
Q1: 1.75
Min: 0.73

AMZN’s P/B Ratio of 6.98 is in the upper tier for the Broadline Retail industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

SW

1.23

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 4.79
Q3: 3.32
Median: 2.14
Q1: 1.60
Min: 0.89

SW’s P/B Ratio of 1.23 is in the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

AMZN vs. SW: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Broadline Retail and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	AMZN	SW
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	33.41	42.93
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	3.52	0.51
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	6.98	1.23
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	109.83	43.42