AMZN vs. SBUX: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AMZN and SBUX, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
AMZN dominates in value with a market cap of 2,135.17 billion USD, eclipsing SBUX’s 94.30 billion USD by roughly 22.64×.
With betas of 1.31 for AMZN and 0.98 for SBUX, both show similar volatility profiles relative to the overall market.
| Symbol | AMZN | SBUX |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Amazon.com, Inc. | Starbucks Corporation |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Consumer Cyclical | Consumer Cyclical |
| Industry | Specialty Retail | Restaurants |
| CEO | Mr. Andrew R. Jassy | Mr. Brian R. Niccol |
| Price | 201.12 USD | 82.98 USD |
| Market Cap | 2,135.17 billion USD | 94.30 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.31 | 0.98 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NASDAQ |
| IPO Date | May 15, 1997 | June 26, 1992 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AMZN and SBUX over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of AMZN and SBUX based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- SBUX carries a sub-zero price-to-book ratio of -12.37, indicating negative equity. In contrast, AMZN (P/B 6.97) has positive book value.
| Symbol | AMZN | SBUX |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 32.34 | 30.13 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 1.61 | 1.59 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 3.28 | 2.59 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 6.97 | -12.37 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 102.60 | 30.79 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 16.31 | 18.50 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 3.39 | 3.24 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 105.82 | 38.41 |
Dividend Comparison
AMZN offers a 0% dividend yield, suggesting it may be reinvesting available cash back into the business for future growth, while SBUX provides a 2.89% dividend yield, giving investors a steady income stream.
| Symbol | AMZN | SBUX |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 2.89% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of AMZN and SBUX, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- SBUX’s current ratio of 0.64 indicates its assets may not cover near-term debts, whereas AMZN at 1.05 maintains healthy liquidity.
- SBUX posts a quick ratio of 0.45, indicating limited coverage of short-term debts from its most liquid assets—while AMZN at 0.84 enjoys stronger liquidity resilience.
- SBUX has negative equity (debt-to-equity ratio -3.41), suggesting asset shortfalls, whereas AMZN at 0.44 preserves healthier equity coverage.
- SBUX carries a debt-to-assets ratio of 0.82, suggesting substantial asset funding via debt, while AMZN at 0.21 opts for a more conservative financing structure.
| Symbol | AMZN | SBUX |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 1.05 | 0.64 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.84 | 0.45 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.44 | -3.41 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.21 | 0.82 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 31.13 | 11.13 |