AMZN vs. MAR: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AMZN and MAR, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength.
Company Overview
AMZN’s market capitalization of 2,251.74 billion USD is substantially larger than MAR’s 69.84 billion USD, indicating a significant difference in their market valuations.
With betas of 1.33 for AMZN and 1.42 for MAR, both stocks show similar sensitivity to overall market movements.
Symbol | AMZN | MAR |
---|---|---|
Company Name | Amazon.com, Inc. | Marriott International, Inc. |
Country | US | US |
Sector | Consumer Cyclical | Consumer Cyclical |
Industry | Specialty Retail | Travel Lodging |
CEO | Mr. Andrew R. Jassy | Mr. Anthony G. Capuano Jr. |
Price | 212.1 USD | 254.99 USD |
Market Cap | 2,251.74 billion USD | 69.84 billion USD |
Beta | 1.33 | 1.42 |
Exchange | NASDAQ | NASDAQ |
IPO Date | May 15, 1997 | March 23, 1998 |
ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AMZN and MAR over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
- AMZN: $11523.42 (15.23%)
- MAR: $10524.17 (5.24%)
Valuation Metrics Comparison
This section compares the market valuation of AMZN and MAR. Key takeaways regarding their valuation, when viewed within their industry context, are presented in the commentary that follows.
- AMZN’s Price-to-Book (P/B) ratio of 7.35 is very high, indicating that investors are willing to pay a substantial premium over its accounting net asset value. MAR, with a P/B ratio of -22.40, shows a negative book value, which is a critical concern for its financial solvency.
Symbol | AMZN | MAR |
---|---|---|
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 34.10 | 28.65 |
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 1.63 | 1.75 |
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 3.46 | 2.75 |
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 7.35 | -22.40 |
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 17.18 | 20.50 |
EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 3.57 | 3.35 |
Dividend Comparison
AMZN currently offers no dividend yield, suggesting it may be reinvesting available cash back into the business for future growth, while MAR provides a 1.00% dividend yield, offering investors a component of income return.
Symbol | AMZN | MAR |
---|---|---|
Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 1.00% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section evaluates the financial strength of AMZN and MAR. Noteworthy observations on their financial resilience, considered from an industry perspective, are detailed in the points that follow.
- AMZN’s current ratio of 1.05 and MAR’s current ratio of 0.45 are both considered low. For AMZN, this level suggests it might encounter challenges in using its current assets to satisfy its immediate financial obligations. MAR’s low current ratio also points to potential constraints on its liquidity, meaning it could find it difficult to cover short-term liabilities with its available assets.
- MAR’s quick ratio of 0.45 is low. This indicates that its readily available liquid assets, excluding inventory, might provide a thin cushion for its short-term obligations, highlighting potential constraints on its immediate debt-paying ability without selling inventory.
- MAR’s Debt-to-Equity (D/E) ratio of -5.00 indicates negative shareholder equity. This is a critical issue, signaling deep financial instability and potentially jeopardizing its ongoing operations and ability to secure credit.
Symbol | AMZN | MAR |
---|---|---|
Current Ratio (TTM) | 1.05 | 0.45 |
Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.84 | 0.45 |
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.44 | -5.00 |
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM) | 0.21 | 0.59 |
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM) | 0.50 | 3.69 |
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 31.13 | 5.31 |