Seek Returns logo

AMZN vs. LIN: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AMZN and LIN, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolAMZNLIN
Company NameAmazon.com, Inc.Linde plc
CountryUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryMaterials
GICS IndustryBroadline RetailChemicals
Market Capitalization2,386.91 billion USD226.18 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNasdaqGS
Listing DateMay 15, 1997June 17, 1992
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AMZN and LIN by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AMZN vs. LIN: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolAMZNLIN
5-Day Price Return-3.10%0.99%
13-Week Price Return8.56%4.79%
26-Week Price Return-2.85%4.62%
52-Week Price Return25.58%5.19%
Month-to-Date Return-4.40%4.80%
Year-to-Date Return2.01%15.21%
10-Day Avg. Volume37.19M1.36M
3-Month Avg. Volume44.00M1.77M
3-Month Volatility26.78%12.85%
Beta1.310.96

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

AMZN

23.84%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
49.17%
Q3
28.98%
Median
19.22%
Q1
10.86%
Min
-11.14%

AMZN’s Return on Equity of 23.84% is on par with the norm for the Broadline Retail industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

LIN

17.46%

Chemicals Industry

Max
26.17%
Q3
13.48%
Median
8.13%
Q1
2.52%
Min
-11.86%

In the upper quartile for the Chemicals industry, LIN’s Return on Equity of 17.46% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

AMZN vs. LIN: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

AMZN

10.54%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
19.78%
Q3
11.90%
Median
8.63%
Q1
5.21%
Min
0.82%

AMZN’s Net Profit Margin of 10.54% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Broadline Retail industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

LIN

20.20%

Chemicals Industry

Max
21.80%
Q3
9.57%
Median
4.44%
Q1
1.14%
Min
-11.30%

A Net Profit Margin of 20.20% places LIN in the upper quartile for the Chemicals industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

AMZN vs. LIN: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

AMZN

11.37%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
27.23%
Q3
15.96%
Median
11.13%
Q1
8.31%
Min
1.77%

AMZN’s Operating Profit Margin of 11.37% is around the midpoint for the Broadline Retail industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

LIN

26.75%

Chemicals Industry

Max
27.33%
Q3
13.97%
Median
8.08%
Q1
4.46%
Min
-8.10%

An Operating Profit Margin of 26.75% places LIN in the upper quartile for the Chemicals industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

AMZN vs. LIN: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAMZNLIN
Return on Equity (TTM)23.84%17.46%
Return on Assets (TTM)11.14%8.10%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)10.54%20.20%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)11.37%26.75%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)49.61%48.45%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

AMZN

1.02

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
3.54
Q3
2.42
Median
1.49
Q1
1.22
Min
0.67

AMZN’s Current Ratio of 1.02 falls into the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

LIN

0.93

Chemicals Industry

Max
3.38
Q3
2.23
Median
1.73
Q1
1.39
Min
0.55

LIN’s Current Ratio of 0.93 falls into the lower quartile for the Chemicals industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

AMZN vs. LIN: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Broadline Retail and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

AMZN

0.15

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
2.14
Q3
1.34
Median
0.63
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, AMZN’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.15 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

LIN

0.67

Chemicals Industry

Max
1.65
Q3
0.94
Median
0.65
Q1
0.41
Min
0.00

LIN’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.67 is typical for the Chemicals industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

AMZN vs. LIN: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Broadline Retail and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

AMZN

0.62

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
37.34
Q3
20.63
Median
11.28
Q1
4.22
Min
-19.29

AMZN’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 0.62 is a critical concern. A value below 1.0 means operating earnings are insufficient to cover interest expenses, indicating severe financial strain and high default risk.

LIN

33.09

Chemicals Industry

Max
56.43
Q3
26.33
Median
9.38
Q1
3.10
Min
-9.39

LIN’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 33.09 is in the upper quartile for the Chemicals industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

AMZN vs. LIN: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAMZNLIN
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.020.93
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.810.70
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.150.67
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)0.6233.09

Growth

Revenue Growth

AMZN vs. LIN: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

AMZN vs. LIN: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

AMZN

0.00%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
5.46%
Q3
2.38%
Median
0.43%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AMZN currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

LIN

1.21%

Chemicals Industry

Max
6.56%
Q3
4.04%
Median
2.47%
Q1
1.45%
Min
0.00%

LIN’s Dividend Yield of 1.21% is in the lower quartile for the Chemicals industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

AMZN vs. LIN: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

AMZN

0.00%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
131.17%
Q3
63.48%
Median
29.43%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AMZN has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

LIN

40.71%

Chemicals Industry

Max
181.25%
Q3
95.01%
Median
53.52%
Q1
26.59%
Min
0.00%

LIN’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 40.71% is within the typical range for the Chemicals industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

AMZN vs. LIN: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAMZNLIN
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%1.21%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%40.71%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

AMZN

34.03

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
66.12
Q3
35.17
Median
16.29
Q1
10.47
Min
5.94

AMZN’s P/E Ratio of 34.03 is within the middle range for the Broadline Retail industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

LIN

33.69

Chemicals Industry

Max
42.94
Q3
29.77
Median
20.37
Q1
14.27
Min
6.19

A P/E Ratio of 33.69 places LIN in the upper quartile for the Chemicals industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

AMZN vs. LIN: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

AMZN

3.59

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
5.40
Q3
3.33
Median
2.04
Q1
0.80
Min
0.16

AMZN’s P/S Ratio of 3.59 is in the upper echelon for the Broadline Retail industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

LIN

6.80

Chemicals Industry

Max
4.36
Q3
2.23
Median
1.01
Q1
0.55
Min
0.16

With a P/S Ratio of 6.80, LIN trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Chemicals industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

AMZN vs. LIN: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

AMZN

6.98

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
9.06
Q3
5.22
Median
3.48
Q1
1.90
Min
0.74

AMZN’s P/B Ratio of 6.98 is in the upper tier for the Broadline Retail industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

LIN

5.73

Chemicals Industry

Max
4.92
Q3
2.56
Median
1.54
Q1
0.97
Min
0.30

At 5.73, LIN’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Chemicals industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

AMZN vs. LIN: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Broadline Retail and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAMZNLIN
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)34.0333.69
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.596.80
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)6.985.73
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)111.8544.62