AMZN vs. LEN: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on July 7, 2025

Here’s a clear look at AMZN and LEN, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

AMZN’s market capitalization of 2,371.81 billion USD is substantially larger than LEN’s 28.88 billion USD, indicating a significant difference in their market valuations.

With betas of 1.33 for AMZN and 1.35 for LEN, both stocks show similar sensitivity to overall market movements.

Symbol	AMZN	LEN
Company Name	Amazon.com, Inc.	Lennar Corporation
Country	US	US
Sector	Consumer Cyclical	Consumer Cyclical
Industry	Specialty Retail	Residential Construction
CEO	Andrew R. Jassy	Stuart A. Miller
Price	223.41 USD	110.12 USD
Market Cap	2,371.81 billion USD	28.88 billion USD
Beta	1.33	1.35
Exchange	NASDAQ	NYSE
IPO Date	May 15, 1997	March 17, 1980
ADR	No	No

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AMZN and LEN by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AMZN vs. LEN: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

AMZN

24.26%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max: 70.52%
Q3: 29.03%
Median: 10.90%
Q1: -7.86%
Min: -57.43%

AMZN’s Return on Equity of 24.26% is on par with the norm for the Specialty Retail industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

LEN

15.56%

Residential Construction Industry

Max: 38.32%
Q3: 24.08%
Median: 16.46%
Q1: 12.92%
Min: 7.81%

LEN’s Return on Equity of 15.56% is on par with the norm for the Residential Construction industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

AMZN vs. LEN: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Specialty Retail and Residential Construction industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

AMZN

13.10%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max: 29.46%
Q3: 13.75%
Median: 8.05%
Q1: 0.80%
Min: -17.95%

AMZN’s Return on Invested Capital of 13.10% is in line with the norm for the Specialty Retail industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

LEN

13.00%

Residential Construction Industry

Max: 19.08%
Q3: 12.67%
Median: 11.66%
Q1: 8.04%
Min: 3.73%

In the upper quartile for the Residential Construction industry, LEN’s Return on Invested Capital of 13.00% signifies a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.

AMZN vs. LEN: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Specialty Retail and Residential Construction industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

AMZN

10.14%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max: 19.78%
Q3: 8.49%
Median: 3.43%
Q1: -0.69%
Min: -9.88%

A Net Profit Margin of 10.14% places AMZN in the upper quartile for the Specialty Retail industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

LEN

11.08%

Residential Construction Industry

Max: 17.37%
Q3: 12.35%
Median: 10.36%
Q1: 8.29%
Min: 3.91%

LEN’s Net Profit Margin of 11.08% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Residential Construction industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

AMZN vs. LEN: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Specialty Retail and Residential Construction industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

AMZN

11.02%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max: 24.47%
Q3: 11.10%
Median: 5.85%
Q1: 0.66%
Min: -12.62%

AMZN’s Operating Profit Margin of 11.02% is around the midpoint for the Specialty Retail industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

LEN

12.05%

Residential Construction Industry

Max: 22.34%
Q3: 15.74%
Median: 12.30%
Q1: 9.51%
Min: 4.20%

LEN’s Operating Profit Margin of 12.05% is around the midpoint for the Residential Construction industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

AMZN vs. LEN: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Specialty Retail and Residential Construction industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	AMZN	LEN
Return on Equity (TTM)	24.26%	15.56%
Return on Assets (TTM)	10.25%	11.40%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)	13.10%	13.00%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	10.14%	11.08%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	11.02%	12.05%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	49.16%	8.56%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

AMZN

1.05

Specialty Retail Industry

Max: 3.24
Q3: 1.99
Median: 1.42
Q1: 1.02
Min: 0.54

AMZN’s Current Ratio of 1.05 aligns with the median group of the Specialty Retail industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

LEN

3.65

Residential Construction Industry

Max: 26.19
Q3: 13.52
Median: 7.75
Q1: 3.72
Min: 1.49

LEN’s Current Ratio of 3.65 falls into the lower quartile for the Residential Construction industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

AMZN vs. LEN: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Specialty Retail and Residential Construction industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

AMZN

0.44

Specialty Retail Industry

Max: 2.72
Q3: 1.42
Median: 0.87
Q1: 0.35
Min: 0.01

AMZN’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.44 is typical for the Specialty Retail industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

LEN

0.12

Residential Construction Industry

Max: 0.60
Q3: 0.40
Median: 0.33
Q1: 0.17
Min: 0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Residential Construction industry, LEN’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.12 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

AMZN vs. LEN: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Specialty Retail and Residential Construction industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

AMZN

31.13

Specialty Retail Industry

Max: 37.34
Q3: 17.19
Median: 4.28
Q1: 0.11
Min: -23.60

AMZN’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 31.13 is in the upper quartile for the Specialty Retail industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

LEN

61.93

Residential Construction Industry

Max: 137.53
Q3: 119.57
Median: 59.70
Q1: 34.03
Min: 10.68

LEN’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 61.93 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Residential Construction industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

AMZN vs. LEN: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Specialty Retail and Residential Construction industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	AMZN	LEN
Current Ratio (TTM)	1.05	3.65
Quick Ratio (TTM)	0.84	0.49
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)	0.44	0.12
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)	0.21	0.08
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)	0.50	0.39
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	31.13	61.93

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for AMZN and LEN. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

AMZN vs. LEN: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

AMZN vs. LEN: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

AMZN vs. LEN: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

AMZN

0.00%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max: 5.54%
Q3: 1.52%
Median: 0.00%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

AMZN currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

LEN

1.80%

Residential Construction Industry

Max: 2.41%
Q3: 1.31%
Median: 0.00%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 1.80%, LEN offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Residential Construction industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

AMZN vs. LEN: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Specialty Retail and Residential Construction industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

AMZN

0.00%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max: 177.64%
Q3: 9.49%
Median: 0.00%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

AMZN has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

LEN

13.81%

Residential Construction Industry

Max: 35.19%
Q3: 10.57%
Median: 2.40%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

LEN’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 13.81% is in the upper quartile for the Residential Construction industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

AMZN vs. LEN: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Specialty Retail and Residential Construction industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	AMZN	LEN
Dividend Yield (TTM)	0.00%	1.80%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	0.00%	13.81%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

AMZN

35.92

Specialty Retail Industry

Max: 81.45
Q3: 42.51
Median: 25.40
Q1: 12.72
Min: 1.88

AMZN’s P/E Ratio of 35.92 is within the middle range for the Specialty Retail industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

LEN

7.35

Residential Construction Industry

Max: 9.55
Q3: 9.42
Median: 7.20
Q1: 6.63
Min: 3.19

LEN’s P/E Ratio of 7.35 is within the middle range for the Residential Construction industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

AMZN vs. LEN: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Specialty Retail and Residential Construction industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

AMZN

1.72

Specialty Retail Industry

Max: 5.90
Q3: 2.79
Median: 1.76
Q1: 0.69
Min: 0.00

AMZN’s Forward PEG Ratio of 1.72 is within the middle range of its peers in the Specialty Retail industry. This suggests a reasonable balance between the stock’s price and its expected growth, aligning with sector valuation norms.

LEN

0.20

Residential Construction Industry

Max: 2.03
Q3: 1.05
Median: 0.49
Q1: 0.25
Min: 0.10

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Residential Construction industry.

AMZN vs. LEN: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Specialty Retail and Residential Construction industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

AMZN

3.65

Specialty Retail Industry

Max: 5.26
Q3: 2.60
Median: 1.29
Q1: 0.41
Min: 0.06

AMZN’s P/S Ratio of 3.65 is in the upper echelon for the Specialty Retail industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

LEN

0.82

Residential Construction Industry

Max: 2.31
Q3: 1.33
Median: 0.79
Q1: 0.56
Min: 0.20

LEN’s P/S Ratio of 0.82 aligns with the market consensus for the Residential Construction industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

AMZN vs. LEN: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Specialty Retail and Residential Construction industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

AMZN

7.74

Specialty Retail Industry

Max: 12.73
Q3: 6.96
Median: 3.28
Q1: 1.42
Min: 0.24

AMZN’s P/B Ratio of 7.74 is in the upper tier for the Specialty Retail industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

LEN

1.28

Residential Construction Industry

Max: 2.33
Q3: 1.66
Median: 1.08
Q1: 0.86
Min: 0.55

LEN’s P/B Ratio of 1.28 is within the conventional range for the Residential Construction industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

AMZN vs. LEN: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Specialty Retail and Residential Construction industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	AMZN	LEN
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)	35.92	7.35
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)	1.72	0.20
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)	3.65	0.82
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)	7.74	1.28
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)	113.97	18.14
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)	18.07	7.41
EV-to-Sales (TTM)	3.75	0.86