Seek Returns logo

AMZN vs. HAS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AMZN and HAS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolAMZNHAS
Company NameAmazon.com, Inc.Hasbro, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryBroadline RetailLeisure Products
Market Capitalization2,430.96 billion USD11.37 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNasdaqGS
Listing DateMay 15, 1997March 17, 1980
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AMZN and HAS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AMZN vs. HAS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolAMZNHAS
5-Day Price Return-0.03%1.26%
13-Week Price Return12.23%22.08%
26-Week Price Return0.58%32.58%
52-Week Price Return29.42%21.31%
Month-to-Date Return-2.64%7.85%
Year-to-Date Return3.90%44.98%
10-Day Avg. Volume35.82M1.60M
3-Month Avg. Volume43.43M2.23M
3-Month Volatility27.21%23.76%
Beta1.300.62

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

AMZN

23.84%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
49.17%
Q3
28.98%
Median
19.22%
Q1
10.86%
Min
-11.14%

AMZN’s Return on Equity of 23.84% is on par with the norm for the Broadline Retail industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

HAS

-58.96%

Leisure Products Industry

Max
35.76%
Q3
21.83%
Median
14.83%
Q1
5.19%
Min
-14.10%

HAS has a negative Return on Equity of -58.96%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

AMZN vs. HAS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Leisure Products industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

AMZN

10.54%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
19.78%
Q3
11.90%
Median
8.63%
Q1
5.21%
Min
0.82%

AMZN’s Net Profit Margin of 10.54% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Broadline Retail industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

HAS

-13.37%

Leisure Products Industry

Max
13.45%
Q3
10.46%
Median
9.86%
Q1
4.71%
Min
-0.81%

HAS has a negative Net Profit Margin of -13.37%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

AMZN vs. HAS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Leisure Products industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

AMZN

11.37%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
27.23%
Q3
15.96%
Median
11.13%
Q1
8.31%
Min
1.77%

AMZN’s Operating Profit Margin of 11.37% is around the midpoint for the Broadline Retail industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

HAS

-8.06%

Leisure Products Industry

Max
15.65%
Q3
14.39%
Median
12.60%
Q1
8.85%
Min
2.80%

HAS has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -8.06%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

AMZN vs. HAS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Leisure Products industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAMZNHAS
Return on Equity (TTM)23.84%-58.96%
Return on Assets (TTM)11.14%-9.17%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)10.54%-13.37%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)11.37%-8.06%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)49.61%65.02%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

AMZN

1.02

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
3.54
Q3
2.42
Median
1.49
Q1
1.22
Min
0.67

AMZN’s Current Ratio of 1.02 falls into the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

HAS

1.66

Leisure Products Industry

Max
4.13
Q3
3.37
Median
2.25
Q1
1.67
Min
1.12

HAS’s Current Ratio of 1.66 falls into the lower quartile for the Leisure Products industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

AMZN vs. HAS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Broadline Retail and Leisure Products industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

AMZN

0.15

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
2.14
Q3
1.34
Median
0.63
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, AMZN’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.15 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

HAS

13.77

Leisure Products Industry

Max
1.68
Q3
1.13
Median
0.29
Q1
0.04
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 13.77, HAS operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Leisure Products industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

AMZN vs. HAS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Broadline Retail and Leisure Products industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

AMZN

0.62

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
37.34
Q3
20.63
Median
11.28
Q1
4.22
Min
-19.29

AMZN’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 0.62 is a critical concern. A value below 1.0 means operating earnings are insufficient to cover interest expenses, indicating severe financial strain and high default risk.

HAS

5.34

Leisure Products Industry

Max
30.53
Q3
28.24
Median
14.76
Q1
5.23
Min
-6.13

HAS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.34 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Leisure Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

AMZN vs. HAS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Leisure Products industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAMZNHAS
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.021.66
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.811.14
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.1513.77
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)0.625.34

Growth

Revenue Growth

AMZN vs. HAS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

AMZN vs. HAS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

AMZN

0.00%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
5.46%
Q3
2.38%
Median
0.43%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AMZN currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

HAS

3.50%

Leisure Products Industry

Max
3.65%
Q3
2.67%
Median
1.92%
Q1
1.26%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 3.50%, HAS offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Leisure Products industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

AMZN vs. HAS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Leisure Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

AMZN

0.00%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
131.17%
Q3
63.48%
Median
29.43%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AMZN has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

HAS

63.63%

Leisure Products Industry

Max
133.30%
Q3
85.97%
Median
68.01%
Q1
48.42%
Min
0.00%

HAS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 63.63% is within the typical range for the Leisure Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

AMZN vs. HAS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Leisure Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAMZNHAS
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%3.50%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%63.63%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

AMZN

34.03

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
66.12
Q3
35.17
Median
16.29
Q1
10.47
Min
5.94

AMZN’s P/E Ratio of 34.03 is within the middle range for the Broadline Retail industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

HAS

--

Leisure Products Industry

Max
39.62
Q3
29.98
Median
25.12
Q1
17.43
Min
10.66

P/E Ratio data for HAS is currently unavailable.

AMZN vs. HAS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Leisure Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

AMZN

3.59

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
5.40
Q3
3.33
Median
2.04
Q1
0.80
Min
0.16

AMZN’s P/S Ratio of 3.59 is in the upper echelon for the Broadline Retail industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

HAS

2.63

Leisure Products Industry

Max
4.03
Q3
2.93
Median
1.67
Q1
1.14
Min
0.43

HAS’s P/S Ratio of 2.63 aligns with the market consensus for the Leisure Products industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

AMZN vs. HAS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Leisure Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

AMZN

6.98

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
9.06
Q3
5.22
Median
3.48
Q1
1.90
Min
0.74

AMZN’s P/B Ratio of 6.98 is in the upper tier for the Broadline Retail industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

HAS

42.90

Leisure Products Industry

Max
7.37
Q3
4.91
Median
3.05
Q1
1.94
Min
1.37

At 42.90, HAS’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Leisure Products industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

AMZN vs. HAS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Broadline Retail and Leisure Products industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAMZNHAS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)34.03--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.592.63
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)6.9842.90
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)111.8522.38