AMZN vs. GS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AMZN and GS, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
AMZN dominates in value with a market cap of 2,135.17 billion USD, eclipsing GS’s 182.10 billion USD by roughly 11.73×.
With betas of 1.31 for AMZN and 1.31 for GS, both show similar volatility profiles relative to the overall market.
| Symbol | AMZN | GS |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Amazon.com, Inc. | The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Consumer Cyclical | Financial Services |
| Industry | Specialty Retail | Financial - Capital Markets |
| CEO | Mr. Andrew R. Jassy | Mr. David Solomon |
| Price | 201.12 USD | 593.46 USD |
| Market Cap | 2,135.17 billion USD | 182.10 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.31 | 1.31 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NYSE |
| IPO Date | May 15, 1997 | May 4, 1999 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AMZN and GS over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of AMZN and GS based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- GS reports a negative Price-to-Free Cash Flow ratio of -7.43, showing a cash flow shortfall that could threaten its operational sustainability, while AMZN at 102.60 maintains positive cash flow.
| Symbol | AMZN | GS |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 32.34 | 12.79 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 1.61 | 1.07 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 3.28 | 3.54 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 6.97 | 107.80 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 102.60 | -7.43 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 16.31 | 9.85 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 3.39 | 3.54 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 105.82 | -7.43 |
Dividend Comparison
AMZN offers a 0% dividend yield, suggesting it may be reinvesting available cash back into the business for future growth, while GS provides a 1.98% dividend yield, giving investors a steady income stream.
| Symbol | AMZN | GS |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 1.98% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of AMZN and GS, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- GS’s low interest coverage (0.23) means it doesn't cover interest from operating earnings. AMZN (at 31.13) meets its interest obligations.
| Symbol | AMZN | GS |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 1.05 | 2.35 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.84 | 2.35 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.44 | 0.04 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.21 | 0.02 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 31.13 | 0.23 |