Seek Returns logo

AMZN vs. FLUT: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AMZN and FLUT, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolAMZNFLUT
Company NameAmazon.com, Inc.Flutter Entertainment plc
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryBroadline RetailHotels, Restaurants & Leisure
Market Capitalization2,341.05 billion USD45.08 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateMay 15, 1997October 4, 2002
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AMZN and FLUT by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AMZN vs. FLUT: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolAMZNFLUT
5-Day Price Return-1.20%-9.52%
13-Week Price Return-1.75%-8.81%
26-Week Price Return15.37%15.68%
52-Week Price Return18.81%10.16%
Month-to-Date Return-0.03%0.91%
Year-to-Date Return0.05%-0.83%
10-Day Avg. Volume48.17M2.74M
3-Month Avg. Volume42.37M2.48M
3-Month Volatility28.11%32.97%
Beta1.371.21

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

AMZN

23.84%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
47.53%
Q3
31.20%
Median
16.63%
Q1
10.81%
Min
-7.57%

AMZN’s Return on Equity of 23.84% is on par with the norm for the Broadline Retail industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

FLUT

3.70%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
84.03%
Q3
40.12%
Median
17.38%
Q1
7.45%
Min
-33.94%

FLUT’s Return on Equity of 3.70% is in the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

AMZN vs. FLUT: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

AMZN

10.54%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
24.63%
Q3
12.77%
Median
8.63%
Q1
4.50%
Min
-1.62%

AMZN’s Net Profit Margin of 10.54% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Broadline Retail industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

FLUT

2.46%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
25.61%
Q3
14.65%
Median
8.66%
Q1
3.36%
Min
-9.83%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, FLUT’s Net Profit Margin of 2.46% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

AMZN vs. FLUT: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

AMZN

11.37%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
27.48%
Q3
17.60%
Median
10.82%
Q1
7.76%
Min
-6.73%

AMZN’s Operating Profit Margin of 11.37% is around the midpoint for the Broadline Retail industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

FLUT

6.53%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
45.80%
Q3
22.44%
Median
14.98%
Q1
6.59%
Min
-15.28%

FLUT’s Operating Profit Margin of 6.53% is in the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

AMZN vs. FLUT: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAMZNFLUT
Return on Equity (TTM)23.84%3.70%
Return on Assets (TTM)11.14%1.40%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)10.54%2.46%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)11.37%6.53%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)49.61%46.94%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

AMZN

1.02

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
3.54
Q3
2.42
Median
1.38
Q1
1.20
Min
0.69

AMZN’s Current Ratio of 1.02 falls into the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

FLUT

0.95

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
2.73
Q3
1.63
Median
1.12
Q1
0.73
Min
0.18

FLUT’s Current Ratio of 0.95 aligns with the median group of the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

AMZN vs. FLUT: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Broadline Retail and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

AMZN

0.15

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
2.01
Q3
1.31
Median
0.72
Q1
0.32
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, AMZN’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.15 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

FLUT

0.97

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
11.29
Q3
4.71
Median
1.65
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

FLUT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.97 is typical for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

AMZN vs. FLUT: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Broadline Retail and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

AMZN

0.62

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
37.34
Q3
21.16
Median
8.60
Q1
3.22
Min
-19.29

AMZN’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 0.62 is a critical concern. A value below 1.0 means operating earnings are insufficient to cover interest expenses, indicating severe financial strain and high default risk.

FLUT

1.02

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
21.72
Q3
11.40
Median
4.02
Q1
1.19
Min
-11.84

In the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, FLUT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.02 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

AMZN vs. FLUT: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAMZNFLUT
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.020.95
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.810.89
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.150.97
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)0.621.02

Growth

Revenue Growth

AMZN vs. FLUT: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

AMZN vs. FLUT: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

AMZN

0.00%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
4.06%
Q3
2.07%
Median
0.37%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AMZN currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

FLUT

0.00%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
6.81%
Q3
2.73%
Median
0.74%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FLUT currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

AMZN vs. FLUT: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

AMZN

0.00%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
114.82%
Q3
62.39%
Median
28.55%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AMZN has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

FLUT

0.00%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
128.39%
Q3
61.60%
Median
21.91%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FLUT has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

AMZN vs. FLUT: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAMZNFLUT
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

AMZN

33.59

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
62.76
Q3
32.50
Median
17.65
Q1
12.08
Min
6.87

A P/E Ratio of 33.59 places AMZN in the upper quartile for the Broadline Retail industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

FLUT

123.26

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
56.96
Q3
33.82
Median
21.30
Q1
15.75
Min
6.06

At 123.26, FLUT’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

AMZN vs. FLUT: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

AMZN

3.54

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
5.19
Q3
3.25
Median
2.13
Q1
1.01
Min
0.21

AMZN’s P/S Ratio of 3.54 is in the upper echelon for the Broadline Retail industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

FLUT

3.03

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
7.19
Q3
3.99
Median
1.93
Q1
1.26
Min
0.17

FLUT’s P/S Ratio of 3.03 aligns with the market consensus for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

AMZN vs. FLUT: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Broadline Retail and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

AMZN

6.98

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
8.81
Q3
5.19
Median
3.42
Q1
1.75
Min
0.73

AMZN’s P/B Ratio of 6.98 is in the upper tier for the Broadline Retail industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

FLUT

4.93

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
24.89
Q3
11.60
Median
4.91
Q1
2.29
Min
0.37

FLUT’s P/B Ratio of 4.93 is within the conventional range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

AMZN vs. FLUT: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Broadline Retail and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAMZNFLUT
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)33.59123.26
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.543.03
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)6.984.93
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)110.4054.42