AMZN vs. BA: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Company Overview

AMZN dominates in value with a market cap of 2,135.17 billion USD, eclipsing BA’s 153.22 billion USD by roughly 13.94×.

With betas of 1.31 for AMZN and 1.41 for BA, both show similar volatility profiles relative to the overall market.

Performance Comparison

This chart compares the performance of AMZN and BA over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).

Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

Valuation Metrics Comparison

The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of AMZN and BA based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.

• BA shows a negative P/E of -13.30, highlighting a year of losses, whereas AMZN at 32.34 trades on solid profitability.
• BA shows a negative forward PEG of -6.09, signaling expected earnings contraction, while AMZN at 1.61 maintains analysts’ projections for stable or improved profits.
• BA carries a sub-zero price-to-book ratio of -46.04, indicating negative equity. In contrast, AMZN (P/B 6.97) has positive book value.
• BA reports a negative Price-to-Free Cash Flow ratio of -12.01, showing a cash flow shortfall that could threaten its operational sustainability, while AMZN at 102.60 maintains positive cash flow.

Dividend Comparison

Neither AMZN nor BA currently pays a dividend yield; this often indicates they are reinvesting earnings for growth, prioritizing long-term expansion over immediate cash returns to shareholders.

Financial Strength Metrics Comparison

This section dives into the financial resilience of AMZN and BA, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.

• BA posts a quick ratio of 0.37, indicating limited coverage of short-term debts from its most liquid assets—while AMZN at 0.84 enjoys stronger liquidity resilience.
• BA has negative equity (debt-to-equity ratio -16.13), suggesting asset shortfalls, whereas AMZN at 0.44 preserves healthier equity coverage.
• AMZN meets its interest obligations (ratio 31.13). In stark contrast, BA’s negative ratio (-3.55) means its operating earnings (EBIT) don't cover basic operations, let alone interest, signaling serious financial trouble.