Seek Returns logo

AMX vs. LBTYA: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AMX and LBTYA, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

AMX’s market capitalization of 55.37 billion USD is substantially larger than LBTYA’s 3.50 billion USD, indicating a significant difference in their market valuations.

LBTYA carries a higher beta at 0.97, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while AMX (beta: 0.27) exhibits greater stability.

AMX trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, LBTYA is a standard domestic listing.

SymbolAMXLBTYA
Company NameAmérica Móvil, S.A.B. de C.V.Liberty Global plc
CountryMXGB
SectorCommunication ServicesCommunication Services
IndustryTelecommunications ServicesTelecommunications Services
CEODaniel Hajj AboumradMichael Thomas Fries
Price18.09 USD9.96 USD
Market Cap55.37 billion USD3.50 billion USD
Beta0.270.97
ExchangeNYSENASDAQ
IPO DateFebruary 12, 2001June 3, 2004
ADRYesNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AMX and LBTYA by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AMX vs. LBTYA: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

AMX

5.41%

Telecommunications Services Industry

Max
36.08%
Q3
16.39%
Median
6.66%
Q1
-5.80%
Min
-26.90%

AMX’s Return on Equity of 5.41% is on par with the norm for the Telecommunications Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

LBTYA

-1.66%

Telecommunications Services Industry

Max
36.08%
Q3
16.39%
Median
6.66%
Q1
-5.80%
Min
-26.90%

LBTYA has a negative Return on Equity of -1.66%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

AMX vs. LBTYA: A comparison of their ROE against the Telecommunications Services industry benchmark.

Return on Invested Capital

AMX

5.23%

Telecommunications Services Industry

Max
13.02%
Q3
6.76%
Median
4.03%
Q1
0.50%
Min
-4.79%

AMX’s Return on Invested Capital of 5.23% is in line with the norm for the Telecommunications Services industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

LBTYA

1.13%

Telecommunications Services Industry

Max
13.02%
Q3
6.76%
Median
4.03%
Q1
0.50%
Min
-4.79%

LBTYA’s Return on Invested Capital of 1.13% is in line with the norm for the Telecommunications Services industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

AMX vs. LBTYA: A comparison of their ROIC against the Telecommunications Services industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin

AMX

3.64%

Telecommunications Services Industry

Max
20.59%
Q3
10.07%
Median
3.00%
Q1
-4.53%
Min
-18.76%

AMX’s Net Profit Margin of 3.64% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Telecommunications Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

LBTYA

-7.27%

Telecommunications Services Industry

Max
20.59%
Q3
10.07%
Median
3.00%
Q1
-4.53%
Min
-18.76%

LBTYA has a negative Net Profit Margin of -7.27%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

AMX vs. LBTYA: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against the Telecommunications Services industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin

AMX

21.67%

Telecommunications Services Industry

Max
37.46%
Q3
22.75%
Median
10.32%
Q1
0.62%
Min
-16.66%

AMX’s Operating Profit Margin of 21.67% is around the midpoint for the Telecommunications Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

LBTYA

-0.62%

Telecommunications Services Industry

Max
37.46%
Q3
22.75%
Median
10.32%
Q1
0.62%
Min
-16.66%

LBTYA has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -0.62%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

AMX vs. LBTYA: A comparison of their Operating Margin against the Telecommunications Services industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAMXLBTYA
Return on Equity (TTM)5.41%-1.66%
Return on Assets (TTM)1.29%--
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)5.23%1.13%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)3.64%-7.27%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)21.67%-0.62%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)62.45%32.34%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

AMX

0.71

Telecommunications Services Industry

Max
2.27
Q3
1.38
Median
0.96
Q1
0.66
Min
0.36

AMX’s Current Ratio of 0.71 aligns with the median group of the Telecommunications Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

LBTYA

--

Telecommunications Services Industry

Max
2.27
Q3
1.38
Median
0.96
Q1
0.66
Min
0.36

Current Ratio data for LBTYA is currently unavailable.

AMX vs. LBTYA: A comparison of their Current Ratio against the Telecommunications Services industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

AMX

1.82

Telecommunications Services Industry

Max
4.64
Q3
2.32
Median
1.35
Q1
0.63
Min
0.00

AMX’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.82 is typical for the Telecommunications Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

LBTYA

0.78

Telecommunications Services Industry

Max
4.64
Q3
2.32
Median
1.35
Q1
0.63
Min
0.00

LBTYA’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.78 is typical for the Telecommunications Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

AMX vs. LBTYA: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against the Telecommunications Services industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio

AMX

4.00

Telecommunications Services Industry

Max
8.83
Q3
4.35
Median
2.26
Q1
0.11
Min
-1.74

AMX’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 4.00 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Telecommunications Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

LBTYA

-0.11

Telecommunications Services Industry

Max
8.83
Q3
4.35
Median
2.26
Q1
0.11
Min
-1.74

LBTYA has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -0.11. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

AMX vs. LBTYA: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against the Telecommunications Services industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAMXLBTYA
Current Ratio (TTM)0.71--
Quick Ratio (TTM)0.66--
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)1.820.78
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.43--
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)3.7223.46
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)4.00-0.11

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for AMX and LBTYA. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

AMX vs. LBTYA: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

AMX vs. LBTYA: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

AMX vs. LBTYA: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

AMX

2.83%

Telecommunications Services Industry

Max
128.28%
Q3
6.07%
Median
1.86%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AMX’s Dividend Yield of 2.83% is consistent with its peers in the Telecommunications Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

LBTYA

0.00%

Telecommunications Services Industry

Max
128.28%
Q3
6.07%
Median
1.86%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

LBTYA currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

AMX vs. LBTYA: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against the Telecommunications Services industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio

AMX

59.04%

Telecommunications Services Industry

Max
146.49%
Q3
63.59%
Median
29.65%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AMX’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 59.04% is within the typical range for the Telecommunications Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

LBTYA

-127.00%

Telecommunications Services Industry

Max
146.49%
Q3
63.59%
Median
29.65%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

LBTYA has a negative Dividend Payout Ratio of -127.00%. This typically means the company paid a dividend despite reporting a net loss, a situation that may signal financial instability.

AMX vs. LBTYA: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against the Telecommunications Services industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAMXLBTYA
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.83%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)59.04%-127.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

AMX

43.05

Telecommunications Services Industry

Max
27.65
Q3
20.70
Median
15.25
Q1
10.05
Min
5.86

At 43.05, AMX’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Telecommunications Services industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

LBTYA

-14.30

Telecommunications Services Industry

Max
27.65
Q3
20.70
Median
15.25
Q1
10.05
Min
5.86

LBTYA has a negative P/E Ratio of -14.30. This occurs when a company has negative earnings (a net loss), making the ratio unsuitable for valuation analysis.

AMX vs. LBTYA: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against the Telecommunications Services industry benchmark.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

AMX

3.35

Telecommunications Services Industry

Max
3.27
Q3
2.93
Median
1.35
Q1
0.64
Min
0.01

AMX’s Forward PEG Ratio of 3.35 is exceptionally high for the Telecommunications Services industry. This suggests its stock price is very high relative to its expected earnings growth, signaling significant overvaluation risk.

LBTYA

-10.23

Telecommunications Services Industry

Max
3.27
Q3
2.93
Median
1.35
Q1
0.64
Min
0.01

LBTYA has a negative Forward PEG Ratio of -10.23. This typically results from negative earnings or forecasts of declining future earnings, making the ratio not meaningful for valuation.

AMX vs. LBTYA: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against the Telecommunications Services industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

AMX

1.55

Telecommunications Services Industry

Max
3.23
Q3
1.83
Median
1.32
Q1
0.83
Min
0.11

AMX’s P/S Ratio of 1.55 aligns with the market consensus for the Telecommunications Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

LBTYA

0.97

Telecommunications Services Industry

Max
3.23
Q3
1.83
Median
1.32
Q1
0.83
Min
0.11

LBTYA’s P/S Ratio of 0.97 aligns with the market consensus for the Telecommunications Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

AMX vs. LBTYA: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against the Telecommunications Services industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio

AMX

2.33

Telecommunications Services Industry

Max
4.39
Q3
2.65
Median
1.82
Q1
1.09
Min
0.29

AMX’s P/B Ratio of 2.33 is within the conventional range for the Telecommunications Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

LBTYA

0.29

Telecommunications Services Industry

Max
4.39
Q3
2.65
Median
1.82
Q1
1.09
Min
0.29

LBTYA’s P/B Ratio of 0.29 is in the lower quartile for the Telecommunications Services industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

AMX vs. LBTYA: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against the Telecommunications Services industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAMXLBTYA
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)43.05-14.30
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)3.35-10.23
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)1.550.97
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)2.330.29
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)18.942.22
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)8.4531.55
EV-to-Sales (TTM)2.783.79