Seek Returns logo

AMT vs. LAMR: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AMT and LAMR, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Both AMT and LAMR are Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs). These entities are required to distribute the majority of their taxable income to shareholders, often resulting in higher dividend yields.

SymbolAMTLAMR
Company NameAmerican Tower CorporationLamar Advertising Company
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorReal EstateReal Estate
GICS IndustrySpecialized REITsSpecialized REITs
Market Capitalization95.18 billion USD12.91 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateFebruary 27, 1998August 2, 1996
Security TypeREITREIT

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AMT and LAMR by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AMT vs. LAMR: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolAMTLAMR
5-Day Price Return-3.08%4.19%
13-Week Price Return-4.88%7.63%
26-Week Price Return6.12%4.63%
52-Week Price Return-9.78%4.19%
Month-to-Date Return-2.46%4.34%
Year-to-Date Return10.83%4.77%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.41M0.79M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.39M0.61M
3-Month Volatility20.03%24.21%
Beta0.881.42

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

AMT

36.23%

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
37.66%
Q3
20.19%
Median
8.96%
Q1
6.32%
Min
-1.71%

In the upper quartile for the Specialized REITs industry, AMT’s Return on Equity of 36.23% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

LAMR

41.90%

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
37.66%
Q3
20.19%
Median
8.96%
Q1
6.32%
Min
-1.71%

LAMR’s Return on Equity of 41.90% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Specialized REITs industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

AMT vs. LAMR: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Specialized REITs industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

AMT

12.60%

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
67.81%
Q3
40.70%
Median
25.91%
Q1
11.01%
Min
1.95%

In the Specialized REITs industry, Net Profit Margin is often not the primary profitability metric.

LAMR

19.72%

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
67.81%
Q3
40.70%
Median
25.91%
Q1
11.01%
Min
1.95%

In the Specialized REITs industry, Net Profit Margin is often not the primary profitability metric.

AMT vs. LAMR: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Specialized REITs industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

AMT

45.53%

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
107.13%
Q3
55.10%
Median
41.03%
Q1
17.97%
Min
5.94%

In the Specialized REITs industry, Operating Profit Margin is often not the primary measure of operational efficiency.

LAMR

27.46%

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
107.13%
Q3
55.10%
Median
41.03%
Q1
17.97%
Min
5.94%

In the Specialized REITs industry, Operating Profit Margin is often not the primary measure of operational efficiency.

AMT vs. LAMR: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Specialized REITs industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAMTLAMR
Return on Equity (TTM)36.23%41.90%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.07%6.68%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)12.60%19.72%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)45.53%27.46%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)74.37%81.58%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

AMT

0.61

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
1.74
Q3
1.13
Median
0.59
Q1
0.35
Min
0.09

AMT’s Current Ratio of 0.61 aligns with the median group of the Specialized REITs industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

LAMR

0.58

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
1.74
Q3
1.13
Median
0.59
Q1
0.35
Min
0.09

LAMR’s Current Ratio of 0.58 aligns with the median group of the Specialized REITs industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

AMT vs. LAMR: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Specialized REITs industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

AMT

10.10

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
4.54
Q3
3.26
Median
1.09
Q1
0.58
Min
0.16

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 10.10, AMT operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Specialized REITs industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

LAMR

3.73

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
4.54
Q3
3.26
Median
1.09
Q1
0.58
Min
0.16

LAMR’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Specialized REITs industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 3.73. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

AMT vs. LAMR: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Specialized REITs industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

AMT

5.07

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
5.24
Q3
4.05
Median
2.99
Q1
2.10
Min
1.28

AMT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.07 is in the upper quartile for the Specialized REITs industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

LAMR

3.24

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
5.24
Q3
4.05
Median
2.99
Q1
2.10
Min
1.28

LAMR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.24 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Specialized REITs industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

AMT vs. LAMR: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Specialized REITs industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAMTLAMR
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.610.58
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.510.58
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)10.103.73
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)5.073.24

Growth

Revenue Growth

AMT vs. LAMR: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

AMT vs. LAMR: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

AMT

3.18%

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
7.06%
Q3
5.09%
Median
4.51%
Q1
3.18%
Min
1.78%

AMT’s Dividend Yield of 3.18% is consistent with its peers in the Specialized REITs industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

LAMR

5.16%

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
7.06%
Q3
5.09%
Median
4.51%
Q1
3.18%
Min
1.78%

With a Dividend Yield of 5.16%, LAMR offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Specialized REITs industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

AMT vs. LAMR: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Specialized REITs industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

AMT

111.40%

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
295.93%
Q3
182.11%
Median
119.31%
Q1
65.42%
Min
43.86%

AMT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 111.40% is within the typical range for the Specialized REITs industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

LAMR

104.38%

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
295.93%
Q3
182.11%
Median
119.31%
Q1
65.42%
Min
43.86%

LAMR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 104.38% is within the typical range for the Specialized REITs industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

AMT vs. LAMR: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Specialized REITs industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAMTLAMR
Dividend Yield (TTM)3.18%5.16%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)111.40%104.38%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

AMT

74.85

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
85.59
Q3
64.69
Median
29.09
Q1
18.22
Min
8.79

The P/E Ratio is often not the primary metric for valuation in the Specialized REITs industry.

LAMR

27.77

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
85.59
Q3
64.69
Median
29.09
Q1
18.22
Min
8.79

The P/E Ratio is often not the primary metric for valuation in the Specialized REITs industry.

AMT vs. LAMR: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Specialized REITs industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

AMT

9.43

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
14.35
Q3
9.60
Median
8.74
Q1
5.61
Min
1.63

AMT’s P/S Ratio of 9.43 aligns with the market consensus for the Specialized REITs industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

LAMR

5.48

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
14.35
Q3
9.60
Median
8.74
Q1
5.61
Min
1.63

In the lower quartile for the Specialized REITs industry, LAMR’s P/S Ratio of 5.48 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

AMT vs. LAMR: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Specialized REITs industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

AMT

27.87

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
11.33
Q3
5.68
Median
2.69
Q1
1.81
Min
0.71

At 27.87, AMT’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Specialized REITs industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

LAMR

13.73

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
11.33
Q3
5.68
Median
2.69
Q1
1.81
Min
0.71

At 13.73, LAMR’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Specialized REITs industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

AMT vs. LAMR: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Specialized REITs industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAMTLAMR
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)74.8527.77
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)9.435.48
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)27.8713.73
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)25.8716.88