Seek Returns logo

AMT vs. CBRE: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AMT and CBRE, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

AMT’s market capitalization of 103.81 billion USD is substantially larger than CBRE’s 42.68 billion USD, indicating a significant difference in their market valuations.

CBRE carries a higher beta at 1.29, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while AMT (beta: 0.83) exhibits greater stability.

SymbolAMTCBRE
Company NameAmerican Tower CorporationCBRE Group, Inc.
CountryUSUS
SectorReal EstateReal Estate
IndustryREIT - SpecialtyReal Estate - Services
CEOSteven O. VondranRobert E. Sulentic
Price221.75 USD143.18 USD
Market Cap103.81 billion USD42.68 billion USD
Beta0.831.29
ExchangeNYSENYSE
IPO DateFebruary 27, 1998June 10, 2004
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AMT and CBRE by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AMT vs. CBRE: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

AMT

50.68%

REIT - Specialty Industry

Max
37.06%
Q3
18.93%
Median
6.30%
Q1
-0.13%
Min
-15.30%

Return on Equity is often not a primary performance indicator in the REIT - Specialty industry.

CBRE

11.91%

Real Estate - Services Industry

Max
11.91%
Q3
9.21%
Median
1.80%
Q1
-6.57%
Min
-12.86%

In the upper quartile for the Real Estate - Services industry, CBRE’s Return on Equity of 11.91% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

AMT vs. CBRE: A comparison of their ROE against their respective REIT - Specialty and Real Estate - Services industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

AMT

7.12%

REIT - Specialty Industry

Max
13.73%
Q3
9.56%
Median
7.01%
Q1
4.47%
Min
3.05%

Return on Invested Capital is often not a primary measure of capital efficiency in the REIT - Specialty industry.

CBRE

6.30%

Real Estate - Services Industry

Max
24.08%
Q3
6.27%
Median
3.51%
Q1
-7.42%
Min
-22.36%

In the upper quartile for the Real Estate - Services industry, CBRE’s Return on Invested Capital of 6.30% signifies a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.

AMT vs. CBRE: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective REIT - Specialty and Real Estate - Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

AMT

17.34%

REIT - Specialty Industry

Max
50.00%
Q3
26.13%
Median
14.60%
Q1
4.75%
Min
1.95%

In the REIT - Specialty industry, Net Profit Margin is often not the primary profitability metric.

CBRE

2.74%

Real Estate - Services Industry

Max
9.09%
Q3
2.89%
Median
2.32%
Q1
-1.64%
Min
-7.18%

CBRE’s Net Profit Margin of 2.74% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Real Estate - Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

AMT vs. CBRE: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective REIT - Specialty and Real Estate - Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

AMT

45.66%

REIT - Specialty Industry

Max
73.20%
Q3
47.39%
Median
32.80%
Q1
16.51%
Min
8.59%

In the REIT - Specialty industry, Operating Profit Margin is often not the primary measure of operational efficiency.

CBRE

4.04%

Real Estate - Services Industry

Max
20.42%
Q3
7.02%
Median
3.99%
Q1
-3.44%
Min
-16.39%

CBRE’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.04% is around the midpoint for the Real Estate - Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

AMT vs. CBRE: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective REIT - Specialty and Real Estate - Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAMTCBRE
Return on Equity (TTM)50.68%11.91%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.94%3.81%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)7.12%6.30%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)17.34%2.74%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)45.66%4.04%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)68.44%19.86%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

AMT

0.55

REIT - Specialty Industry

Max
4.07
Q3
2.38
Median
1.43
Q1
0.59
Min
0.19

For the REIT - Specialty industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

CBRE

1.00

Real Estate - Services Industry

Max
3.77
Q3
2.87
Median
1.40
Q1
1.11
Min
0.31

CBRE’s Current Ratio of 1.00 falls into the lower quartile for the Real Estate - Services industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

AMT vs. CBRE: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective REIT - Specialty and Real Estate - Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

AMT

12.56

REIT - Specialty Industry

Max
2.76
Q3
1.56
Median
1.11
Q1
0.55
Min
0.42

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 12.56, AMT operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the REIT - Specialty industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

CBRE

1.07

Real Estate - Services Industry

Max
2.11
Q3
1.66
Median
0.54
Q1
0.24
Min
0.00

CBRE’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.07 is typical for the Real Estate - Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

AMT vs. CBRE: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective REIT - Specialty and Real Estate - Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

AMT

3.51

REIT - Specialty Industry

Max
3.62
Q3
3.44
Median
3.01
Q1
2.44
Min
1.17

AMT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.51 is in the upper quartile for the REIT - Specialty industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

CBRE

6.48

Real Estate - Services Industry

Max
12.80
Q3
6.13
Median
2.49
Q1
-1.96
Min
-9.17

CBRE’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 6.48 is in the upper quartile for the Real Estate - Services industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

AMT vs. CBRE: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective REIT - Specialty and Real Estate - Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAMTCBRE
Current Ratio (TTM)0.551.00
Quick Ratio (TTM)0.551.00
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)12.561.07
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.720.34
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)5.683.65
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)3.516.48

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for AMT and CBRE. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

AMT vs. CBRE: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

AMT vs. CBRE: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

AMT vs. CBRE: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

AMT

2.99%

REIT - Specialty Industry

Max
13.18%
Q3
6.30%
Median
4.63%
Q1
2.61%
Min
0.00%

AMT’s Dividend Yield of 2.99% is consistent with its peers in the REIT - Specialty industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CBRE

0.00%

Real Estate - Services Industry

Max
10.79%
Q3
1.45%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CBRE currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

AMT vs. CBRE: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective REIT - Specialty and Real Estate - Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

AMT

124.45%

REIT - Specialty Industry

Max
667.77%
Q3
177.73%
Median
119.02%
Q1
86.06%
Min
0.14%

AMT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 124.45% is above 100%. This means the company is paying out more in dividends than it earned, a practice that is often unsustainable and could indicate a risk to future dividend stability.

CBRE

0.00%

Real Estate - Services Industry

Max
34.56%
Q3
3.97%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CBRE has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

AMT vs. CBRE: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective REIT - Specialty and Real Estate - Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAMTCBRE
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.99%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)124.45%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

AMT

56.78

REIT - Specialty Industry

Max
82.59
Q3
54.68
Median
29.28
Q1
15.94
Min
8.64

The P/E Ratio is often not the primary metric for valuation in the REIT - Specialty industry.

CBRE

43.58

Real Estate - Services Industry

Max
76.80
Q3
59.95
Median
42.42
Q1
19.27
Min
12.83

CBRE’s P/E Ratio of 43.58 is within the middle range for the Real Estate - Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

AMT vs. CBRE: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective REIT - Specialty and Real Estate - Services industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

AMT

4.98

REIT - Specialty Industry

Max
12.06
Q3
5.37
Median
2.44
Q1
0.82
Min
0.51

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the REIT - Specialty industry.

CBRE

2.72

Real Estate - Services Industry

Max
13.06
Q3
6.50
Median
1.45
Q1
0.67
Min
0.01

CBRE’s Forward PEG Ratio of 2.72 is within the middle range of its peers in the Real Estate - Services industry. This suggests a reasonable balance between the stock’s price and its expected growth, aligning with sector valuation norms.

AMT vs. CBRE: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective REIT - Specialty and Real Estate - Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

AMT

9.86

REIT - Specialty Industry

Max
9.68
Q3
8.45
Median
5.59
Q1
2.71
Min
0.89

With a P/S Ratio of 9.86, AMT trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the REIT - Specialty industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

CBRE

1.16

Real Estate - Services Industry

Max
1.84
Q3
1.80
Median
1.22
Q1
0.65
Min
0.07

CBRE’s P/S Ratio of 1.16 aligns with the market consensus for the Real Estate - Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

AMT vs. CBRE: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective REIT - Specialty and Real Estate - Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

AMT

29.34

REIT - Specialty Industry

Max
10.05
Q3
5.14
Median
1.95
Q1
1.66
Min
1.09

At 29.34, AMT’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the REIT - Specialty industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

CBRE

5.29

Real Estate - Services Industry

Max
6.77
Q3
5.49
Median
1.72
Q1
0.71
Min
0.28

The P/B Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric for the Real Estate - Services industry.

AMT vs. CBRE: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective REIT - Specialty and Real Estate - Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAMTCBRE
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)56.7843.58
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)4.982.72
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)9.861.16
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)29.345.29
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)27.4831.43
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)19.6224.49
EV-to-Sales (TTM)13.871.37