Seek Returns logo

AMT vs. CBRE: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AMT and CBRE, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

A key difference in structure is that AMT is a Real Estate Investment Trust (REIT), a company that primarily invests in income-generating real estate, whereas CBRE is a conventional stock.

SymbolAMTCBRE
Company NameAmerican Tower CorporationCBRE Group, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorReal EstateReal Estate
GICS IndustrySpecialized REITsReal Estate Management & Development
Market Capitalization98.10 billion USD47.86 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateFebruary 27, 1998June 10, 2004
Security TypeREITCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AMT and CBRE by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AMT vs. CBRE: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolAMTCBRE
5-Day Price Return1.22%1.45%
13-Week Price Return-3.15%23.26%
26-Week Price Return9.04%12.37%
52-Week Price Return-6.00%42.97%
Month-to-Date Return-0.84%3.27%
Year-to-Date Return12.67%22.51%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.24M1.30M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.44M1.68M
3-Month Volatility19.54%27.51%
Beta0.891.40

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

AMT

36.23%

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
37.66%
Q3
20.19%
Median
8.96%
Q1
6.32%
Min
-1.71%

In the upper quartile for the Specialized REITs industry, AMT’s Return on Equity of 36.23% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

CBRE

12.96%

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
14.65%
Q3
8.92%
Median
3.63%
Q1
1.63%
Min
-8.05%

In the upper quartile for the Real Estate Management & Development industry, CBRE’s Return on Equity of 12.96% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

AMT vs. CBRE: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Specialized REITs and Real Estate Management & Development industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

AMT

12.60%

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
67.81%
Q3
40.70%
Median
25.91%
Q1
11.01%
Min
1.95%

In the Specialized REITs industry, Net Profit Margin is often not the primary profitability metric.

CBRE

2.86%

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
57.16%
Q3
24.60%
Median
9.48%
Q1
2.61%
Min
-26.61%

CBRE’s Net Profit Margin of 2.86% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Real Estate Management & Development industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

AMT vs. CBRE: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Specialized REITs and Real Estate Management & Development industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

AMT

45.53%

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
107.13%
Q3
55.10%
Median
41.03%
Q1
17.97%
Min
5.94%

In the Specialized REITs industry, Operating Profit Margin is often not the primary measure of operational efficiency.

CBRE

4.23%

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
92.29%
Q3
43.61%
Median
20.96%
Q1
6.44%
Min
-48.90%

CBRE’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.23% is in the lower quartile for the Real Estate Management & Development industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

AMT vs. CBRE: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Specialized REITs and Real Estate Management & Development industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAMTCBRE
Return on Equity (TTM)36.23%12.96%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.07%4.22%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)12.60%2.86%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)45.53%4.23%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)74.37%19.42%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

AMT

0.61

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
1.74
Q3
1.13
Median
0.59
Q1
0.35
Min
0.09

AMT’s Current Ratio of 0.61 aligns with the median group of the Specialized REITs industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CBRE

1.13

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
3.73
Q3
2.22
Median
1.42
Q1
1.03
Min
0.04

CBRE’s Current Ratio of 1.13 aligns with the median group of the Real Estate Management & Development industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

AMT vs. CBRE: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Specialized REITs and Real Estate Management & Development industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

AMT

10.10

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
4.54
Q3
3.26
Median
1.09
Q1
0.58
Min
0.16

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 10.10, AMT operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Specialized REITs industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

CBRE

0.90

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
2.62
Q3
1.30
Median
0.84
Q1
0.39
Min
0.00

CBRE’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.90 is typical for the Real Estate Management & Development industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

AMT vs. CBRE: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Specialized REITs and Real Estate Management & Development industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

AMT

5.07

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
5.24
Q3
4.05
Median
2.99
Q1
2.10
Min
1.28

AMT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.07 is in the upper quartile for the Specialized REITs industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

CBRE

6.21

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
23.14
Q3
12.97
Median
3.68
Q1
1.29
Min
-4.45

CBRE’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 6.21 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Real Estate Management & Development industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

AMT vs. CBRE: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Specialized REITs and Real Estate Management & Development industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAMTCBRE
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.611.13
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.511.09
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)10.100.90
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)5.076.21

Growth

Revenue Growth

AMT vs. CBRE: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

AMT vs. CBRE: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

AMT

3.18%

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
7.06%
Q3
5.09%
Median
4.51%
Q1
3.18%
Min
1.78%

AMT’s Dividend Yield of 3.18% is consistent with its peers in the Specialized REITs industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CBRE

0.00%

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
6.79%
Q3
3.51%
Median
2.22%
Q1
0.52%
Min
0.00%

CBRE currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

AMT vs. CBRE: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Specialized REITs and Real Estate Management & Development industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

AMT

111.40%

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
295.93%
Q3
182.11%
Median
119.31%
Q1
65.42%
Min
43.86%

AMT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 111.40% is within the typical range for the Specialized REITs industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CBRE

0.00%

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
242.45%
Q3
106.13%
Median
55.27%
Q1
14.97%
Min
0.00%

CBRE has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

AMT vs. CBRE: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Specialized REITs and Real Estate Management & Development industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAMTCBRE
Dividend Yield (TTM)3.18%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)111.40%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

AMT

74.85

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
85.59
Q3
64.69
Median
29.09
Q1
18.22
Min
8.79

The P/E Ratio is often not the primary metric for valuation in the Specialized REITs industry.

CBRE

44.10

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
41.09
Q3
23.50
Median
17.29
Q1
11.14
Min
6.36

At 44.10, CBRE’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Real Estate Management & Development industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

AMT vs. CBRE: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Specialized REITs and Real Estate Management & Development industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

AMT

9.43

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
14.35
Q3
9.60
Median
8.74
Q1
5.61
Min
1.63

AMT’s P/S Ratio of 9.43 aligns with the market consensus for the Specialized REITs industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

CBRE

1.26

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
12.22
Q3
5.64
Median
2.53
Q1
0.98
Min
0.01

CBRE’s P/S Ratio of 1.26 aligns with the market consensus for the Real Estate Management & Development industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

AMT vs. CBRE: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Specialized REITs and Real Estate Management & Development industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

AMT

27.87

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
11.33
Q3
5.68
Median
2.69
Q1
1.81
Min
0.71

At 27.87, AMT’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Specialized REITs industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

CBRE

5.06

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
2.36
Q3
1.18
Median
0.75
Q1
0.35
Min
0.06

At 5.06, CBRE’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Real Estate Management & Development industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

AMT vs. CBRE: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Specialized REITs and Real Estate Management & Development industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAMTCBRE
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)74.8544.10
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)9.431.26
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)27.875.06
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)25.8724.51