Seek Returns logo

AMP vs. UNM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AMP and UNM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

AMP’s market capitalization of 51.73 billion USD is substantially larger than UNM’s 14.32 billion USD, indicating a significant difference in their market valuations.

AMP’s beta of 1.23 points to significantly higher volatility compared to UNM (beta: 0.42), suggesting AMP has greater potential for both gains and losses relative to market movements.

SymbolAMPUNM
Company NameAmeriprise Financial, Inc.Unum Group
CountryUSUS
SectorFinancial ServicesFinancial Services
IndustryAsset ManagementInsurance - Life
CEOJames M. Cracchiolo CPARichard Paul McKenney
Price543.3 USD82.12 USD
Market Cap51.73 billion USD14.32 billion USD
Beta1.230.42
ExchangeNYSENYSE
IPO DateSeptember 15, 2005November 6, 1986
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AMP and UNM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AMP vs. UNM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

AMP

56.06%

Asset Management Industry

Max
34.25%
Q3
18.22%
Median
11.24%
Q1
5.81%
Min
-5.72%

AMP’s Return on Equity of 56.06% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Asset Management industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

UNM

14.78%

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
23.38%
Q3
14.56%
Median
11.23%
Q1
1.67%
Min
-5.23%

In the upper quartile for the Insurance - Life industry, UNM’s Return on Equity of 14.78% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

AMP vs. UNM: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Asset Management and Insurance - Life industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

AMP

38.36%

Asset Management Industry

Max
42.18%
Q3
20.06%
Median
8.68%
Q1
3.13%
Min
-16.42%

In the upper quartile for the Asset Management industry, AMP’s Return on Invested Capital of 38.36% signifies a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.

UNM

2.63%

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
6.30%
Q3
3.33%
Median
2.16%
Q1
0.68%
Min
-0.10%

Return on Invested Capital is often not a primary measure of capital efficiency in the Insurance - Life industry.

AMP vs. UNM: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Asset Management and Insurance - Life industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

AMP

17.14%

Asset Management Industry

Max
91.66%
Q3
57.81%
Median
29.48%
Q1
15.70%
Min
-27.65%

AMP’s Net Profit Margin of 17.14% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Asset Management industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

UNM

12.35%

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
21.20%
Q3
11.59%
Median
7.10%
Q1
3.79%
Min
2.14%

A Net Profit Margin of 12.35% places UNM in the upper quartile for the Insurance - Life industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

AMP vs. UNM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Asset Management and Insurance - Life industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

AMP

21.38%

Asset Management Industry

Max
99.76%
Q3
78.28%
Median
34.76%
Q1
21.75%
Min
-48.25%

AMP’s Operating Profit Margin of 21.38% is in the lower quartile for the Asset Management industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

UNM

16.42%

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
38.96%
Q3
37.28%
Median
14.06%
Q1
8.95%
Min
-1.68%

In the Insurance - Life industry, Operating Profit Margin is often not the primary measure of operational efficiency.

AMP vs. UNM: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Asset Management and Insurance - Life industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAMPUNM
Return on Equity (TTM)56.06%14.78%
Return on Assets (TTM)1.67%2.52%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)38.36%2.63%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)17.14%12.35%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)21.38%16.42%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)100.00%98.21%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

AMP

38.84

Asset Management Industry

Max
12.44
Q3
5.76
Median
3.04
Q1
1.03
Min
0.01

AMP’s Current Ratio of 38.84 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Asset Management industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

UNM

--

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
843.97
Q3
821.68
Median
6.06
Q1
3.15
Min
0.47

Current Ratio data for UNM is currently unavailable.

AMP vs. UNM: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Asset Management and Insurance - Life industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

AMP

0.70

Asset Management Industry

Max
2.62
Q3
1.42
Median
0.76
Q1
0.34
Min
0.01

AMP’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.70 is typical for the Asset Management industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

UNM

0.37

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
0.86
Q3
0.83
Median
0.55
Q1
0.37
Min
0.27

UNM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.37 is typical for the Insurance - Life industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

AMP vs. UNM: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Asset Management and Insurance - Life industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

AMP

11.42

Asset Management Industry

Max
13.30
Q3
6.30
Median
2.71
Q1
1.00
Min
-6.91

AMP’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 11.42 is in the upper quartile for the Asset Management industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

UNM

10.27

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
37.82
Q3
19.50
Median
6.25
Q1
2.29
Min
-0.76

UNM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 10.27 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Insurance - Life industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

AMP vs. UNM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Asset Management and Insurance - Life industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAMPUNM
Current Ratio (TTM)38.84--
Quick Ratio (TTM)38.84--
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.700.37
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.020.06
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)1.031.59
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)11.4210.27

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for AMP and UNM. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

AMP vs. UNM: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

AMP vs. UNM: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

AMP vs. UNM: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

AMP

1.11%

Asset Management Industry

Max
26.09%
Q3
11.60%
Median
6.37%
Q1
2.75%
Min
0.00%

AMP’s Dividend Yield of 1.11% is in the lower quartile for the Asset Management industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

UNM

2.05%

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
10.36%
Q3
4.76%
Median
2.40%
Q1
1.51%
Min
0.00%

UNM’s Dividend Yield of 2.05% is consistent with its peers in the Insurance - Life industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

AMP vs. UNM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Asset Management and Insurance - Life industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

AMP

19.37%

Asset Management Industry

Max
1,034.88%
Q3
127.70%
Median
75.15%
Q1
34.21%
Min
0.00%

AMP’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 19.37% is in the lower quartile for the Asset Management industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

UNM

19.14%

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
203.94%
Q3
64.38%
Median
29.88%
Q1
19.14%
Min
0.00%

UNM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 19.14% is within the typical range for the Insurance - Life industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

AMP vs. UNM: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Asset Management and Insurance - Life industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAMPUNM
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.11%2.05%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)19.37%19.14%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

AMP

17.87

Asset Management Industry

Max
38.72
Q3
23.40
Median
11.45
Q1
8.80
Min
1.54

AMP’s P/E Ratio of 17.87 is within the middle range for the Asset Management industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

UNM

9.31

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
17.82
Q3
16.08
Median
12.43
Q1
7.33
Min
3.69

UNM’s P/E Ratio of 9.31 is within the middle range for the Insurance - Life industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

AMP vs. UNM: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Asset Management and Insurance - Life industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

AMP

1.32

Asset Management Industry

Max
6.38
Q3
3.23
Median
1.55
Q1
0.89
Min
0.02

AMP’s Forward PEG Ratio of 1.32 is within the middle range of its peers in the Asset Management industry. This suggests a reasonable balance between the stock’s price and its expected growth, aligning with sector valuation norms.

UNM

0.89

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
3.81
Q3
1.95
Median
0.97
Q1
0.53
Min
0.24

UNM’s Forward PEG Ratio of 0.89 is within the middle range of its peers in the Insurance - Life industry. This suggests a reasonable balance between the stock’s price and its expected growth, aligning with sector valuation norms.

AMP vs. UNM: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Asset Management and Insurance - Life industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

AMP

2.96

Asset Management Industry

Max
13.75
Q3
7.92
Median
4.87
Q1
3.51
Min
0.02

In the lower quartile for the Asset Management industry, AMP’s P/S Ratio of 2.96 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

UNM

1.12

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
3.84
Q3
2.89
Median
1.06
Q1
0.63
Min
0.31

UNM’s P/S Ratio of 1.12 aligns with the market consensus for the Insurance - Life industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

AMP vs. UNM: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Asset Management and Insurance - Life industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

AMP

9.86

Asset Management Industry

Max
5.33
Q3
2.75
Median
1.06
Q1
0.87
Min
0.00

The P/B Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric for the Asset Management industry.

UNM

1.44

Insurance - Life Industry

Max
3.87
Q3
2.13
Median
1.49
Q1
0.95
Min
0.38

UNM’s P/B Ratio of 1.44 is within the conventional range for the Insurance - Life industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

AMP vs. UNM: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Asset Management and Insurance - Life industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAMPUNM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)17.879.31
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)1.320.89
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)2.961.12
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)9.861.44
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)7.759.98
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)15.128.08
EV-to-Sales (TTM)3.181.40