Seek Returns logo

AMP vs. SFB: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AMP and SFB, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

AMP’s market capitalization of 51.73 billion USD is substantially larger than SFB’s 11.03 billion USD, indicating a significant difference in their market valuations.

With betas of 1.23 for AMP and 1.09 for SFB, both stocks show similar sensitivity to overall market movements.

SymbolAMPSFB
Company NameAmeriprise Financial, Inc.Stifel Financial Corporation 5.20% Senior Notes due 2047
CountryUSUS
SectorFinancial ServicesFinancial Services
IndustryAsset ManagementInvestment - Banking & Investment Services
CEOJames M. Cracchiolo CPANone
Price543.3 USD21 USD
Market Cap51.73 billion USD11.03 billion USD
Beta1.231.09
ExchangeNYSENYSE
IPO DateSeptember 15, 2005October 17, 2017
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AMP and SFB by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AMP vs. SFB: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

AMP

56.06%

Asset Management Industry

Max
34.25%
Q3
18.22%
Median
11.24%
Q1
5.81%
Min
-5.72%

AMP’s Return on Equity of 56.06% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Asset Management industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

SFB

11.33%

Investment - Banking & Investment Services Industry

Max
11.33%
Q3
9.82%
Median
6.95%
Q1
1.70%
Min
-7.08%

In the upper quartile for the Investment - Banking & Investment Services industry, SFB’s Return on Equity of 11.33% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

AMP vs. SFB: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Asset Management and Investment - Banking & Investment Services industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

AMP

38.36%

Asset Management Industry

Max
42.18%
Q3
20.06%
Median
8.68%
Q1
3.13%
Min
-16.42%

In the upper quartile for the Asset Management industry, AMP’s Return on Invested Capital of 38.36% signifies a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.

SFB

2.76%

Investment - Banking & Investment Services Industry

Max
9.59%
Q3
7.88%
Median
1.38%
Q1
-3.64%
Min
-7.80%

Return on Invested Capital is often not a primary measure of capital efficiency in the Investment - Banking & Investment Services industry.

AMP vs. SFB: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Asset Management and Investment - Banking & Investment Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

AMP

17.14%

Asset Management Industry

Max
91.66%
Q3
57.81%
Median
29.48%
Q1
15.70%
Min
-27.65%

AMP’s Net Profit Margin of 17.14% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Asset Management industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

SFB

11.29%

Investment - Banking & Investment Services Industry

Max
45.80%
Q3
30.83%
Median
9.16%
Q1
-2.60%
Min
-38.28%

SFB’s Net Profit Margin of 11.29% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Investment - Banking & Investment Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

AMP vs. SFB: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Asset Management and Investment - Banking & Investment Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

AMP

21.38%

Asset Management Industry

Max
99.76%
Q3
78.28%
Median
34.76%
Q1
21.75%
Min
-48.25%

AMP’s Operating Profit Margin of 21.38% is in the lower quartile for the Asset Management industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

SFB

24.92%

Investment - Banking & Investment Services Industry

Max
81.43%
Q3
42.20%
Median
12.51%
Q1
-8.30%
Min
-22.17%

SFB’s Operating Profit Margin of 24.92% is around the midpoint for the Investment - Banking & Investment Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

AMP vs. SFB: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Asset Management and Investment - Banking & Investment Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAMPSFB
Return on Equity (TTM)56.06%11.33%
Return on Assets (TTM)1.67%1.56%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)38.36%2.76%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)17.14%11.29%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)21.38%24.92%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)100.00%81.86%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

AMP

38.84

Asset Management Industry

Max
12.44
Q3
5.76
Median
3.04
Q1
1.03
Min
0.01

AMP’s Current Ratio of 38.84 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Asset Management industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

SFB

--

Investment - Banking & Investment Services Industry

Max
1.44
Q3
1.42
Median
0.81
Q1
0.28
Min
0.03

Current Ratio data for SFB is currently unavailable.

AMP vs. SFB: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Asset Management and Investment - Banking & Investment Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

AMP

0.70

Asset Management Industry

Max
2.62
Q3
1.42
Median
0.76
Q1
0.34
Min
0.01

AMP’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.70 is typical for the Asset Management industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

SFB

0.27

Investment - Banking & Investment Services Industry

Max
1.86
Q3
1.69
Median
1.12
Q1
0.65
Min
0.27

Falling into the lower quartile for the Investment - Banking & Investment Services industry, SFB’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.27 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

AMP vs. SFB: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Asset Management and Investment - Banking & Investment Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

AMP

11.42

Asset Management Industry

Max
13.30
Q3
6.30
Median
2.71
Q1
1.00
Min
-6.91

AMP’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 11.42 is in the upper quartile for the Asset Management industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

SFB

1.88

Investment - Banking & Investment Services Industry

Max
10.11
Q3
5.15
Median
1.31
Q1
-0.12
Min
-0.75

SFB’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.88 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Investment - Banking & Investment Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

AMP vs. SFB: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Asset Management and Investment - Banking & Investment Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAMPSFB
Current Ratio (TTM)38.84--
Quick Ratio (TTM)38.84--
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.700.27
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.020.04
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)1.03-0.97
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)11.421.88

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for AMP and SFB. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

AMP vs. SFB: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

AMP vs. SFB: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

AMP vs. SFB: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

AMP

1.11%

Asset Management Industry

Max
26.09%
Q3
11.60%
Median
6.37%
Q1
2.75%
Min
0.00%

AMP’s Dividend Yield of 1.11% is in the lower quartile for the Asset Management industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

SFB

1.61%

Investment - Banking & Investment Services Industry

Max
8.37%
Q3
8.00%
Median
7.73%
Q1
4.20%
Min
0.00%

SFB’s Dividend Yield of 1.61% is in the lower quartile for the Investment - Banking & Investment Services industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

AMP vs. SFB: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Asset Management and Investment - Banking & Investment Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

AMP

19.37%

Asset Management Industry

Max
1,034.88%
Q3
127.70%
Median
75.15%
Q1
34.21%
Min
0.00%

AMP’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 19.37% is in the lower quartile for the Asset Management industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

SFB

47.45%

Investment - Banking & Investment Services Industry

Max
116.00%
Q3
105.02%
Median
47.45%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

SFB’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 47.45% is within the typical range for the Investment - Banking & Investment Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

AMP vs. SFB: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Asset Management and Investment - Banking & Investment Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAMPSFB
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.11%1.61%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)19.37%47.45%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

AMP

17.87

Asset Management Industry

Max
38.72
Q3
23.40
Median
11.45
Q1
8.80
Min
1.54

AMP’s P/E Ratio of 17.87 is within the middle range for the Asset Management industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

SFB

18.43

Investment - Banking & Investment Services Industry

Max
17.50
Q3
15.38
Median
13.59
Q1
9.39
Min
0.41

At 18.43, SFB’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Investment - Banking & Investment Services industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

AMP vs. SFB: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Asset Management and Investment - Banking & Investment Services industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

AMP

1.32

Asset Management Industry

Max
6.38
Q3
3.23
Median
1.55
Q1
0.89
Min
0.02

AMP’s Forward PEG Ratio of 1.32 is within the middle range of its peers in the Asset Management industry. This suggests a reasonable balance between the stock’s price and its expected growth, aligning with sector valuation norms.

SFB

0.79

Investment - Banking & Investment Services Industry

Max
5.52
Q3
5.29
Median
5.05
Q1
2.90
Min
0.75

In the lower quartile for the Investment - Banking & Investment Services industry, SFB’s Forward PEG Ratio of 0.79 is a positive indicator. It suggests that the stock may be attractively valued relative to its expected earnings growth.

AMP vs. SFB: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Asset Management and Investment - Banking & Investment Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

AMP

2.96

Asset Management Industry

Max
13.75
Q3
7.92
Median
4.87
Q1
3.51
Min
0.02

In the lower quartile for the Asset Management industry, AMP’s P/S Ratio of 2.96 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

SFB

2.04

Investment - Banking & Investment Services Industry

Max
6.72
Q3
5.60
Median
3.30
Q1
1.69
Min
0.00

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Investment - Banking & Investment Services industry.

AMP vs. SFB: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Asset Management and Investment - Banking & Investment Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

AMP

9.86

Asset Management Industry

Max
5.33
Q3
2.75
Median
1.06
Q1
0.87
Min
0.00

The P/B Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric for the Asset Management industry.

SFB

2.01

Investment - Banking & Investment Services Industry

Max
1.91
Q3
1.39
Median
1.21
Q1
0.97
Min
0.90

At 2.01, SFB’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Investment - Banking & Investment Services industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

AMP vs. SFB: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Asset Management and Investment - Banking & Investment Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAMPSFB
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)17.8718.43
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)1.320.79
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)2.962.04
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)9.862.01
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)7.7545.93
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)15.126.94
EV-to-Sales (TTM)3.181.79