Seek Returns logo

AMP vs. PYPL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AMP and PYPL, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

AMP’s market capitalization stands at 51.73 billion USD, while PYPL’s is 74.49 billion USD, indicating their market valuations are broadly comparable.

With betas of 1.23 for AMP and 1.45 for PYPL, both stocks show similar sensitivity to overall market movements.

SymbolAMPPYPL
Company NameAmeriprise Financial, Inc.PayPal Holdings, Inc.
CountryUSUS
SectorFinancial ServicesFinancial Services
IndustryAsset ManagementFinancial - Credit Services
CEOJames M. Cracchiolo CPAAlex Chriss
Price543.3 USD76.59 USD
Market Cap51.73 billion USD74.49 billion USD
Beta1.231.45
ExchangeNYSENASDAQ
IPO DateSeptember 15, 2005July 6, 2015
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AMP and PYPL by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AMP vs. PYPL: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

AMP

56.06%

Asset Management Industry

Max
34.25%
Q3
18.22%
Median
11.24%
Q1
5.81%
Min
-5.72%

AMP’s Return on Equity of 56.06% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Asset Management industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

PYPL

22.32%

Financial - Credit Services Industry

Max
34.05%
Q3
18.70%
Median
10.57%
Q1
3.55%
Min
-12.12%

In the upper quartile for the Financial - Credit Services industry, PYPL’s Return on Equity of 22.32% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

AMP vs. PYPL: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Asset Management and Financial - Credit Services industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

AMP

38.36%

Asset Management Industry

Max
42.18%
Q3
20.06%
Median
8.68%
Q1
3.13%
Min
-16.42%

In the upper quartile for the Asset Management industry, AMP’s Return on Invested Capital of 38.36% signifies a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.

PYPL

13.24%

Financial - Credit Services Industry

Max
68.11%
Q3
32.26%
Median
9.52%
Q1
3.37%
Min
-7.03%

Return on Invested Capital is often not a primary measure of capital efficiency in the Financial - Credit Services industry.

AMP vs. PYPL: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Asset Management and Financial - Credit Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

AMP

17.14%

Asset Management Industry

Max
91.66%
Q3
57.81%
Median
29.48%
Q1
15.70%
Min
-27.65%

AMP’s Net Profit Margin of 17.14% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Asset Management industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

PYPL

14.27%

Financial - Credit Services Industry

Max
39.42%
Q3
20.10%
Median
12.91%
Q1
5.82%
Min
-14.80%

PYPL’s Net Profit Margin of 14.27% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Financial - Credit Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

AMP vs. PYPL: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Asset Management and Financial - Credit Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

AMP

21.38%

Asset Management Industry

Max
99.76%
Q3
78.28%
Median
34.76%
Q1
21.75%
Min
-48.25%

AMP’s Operating Profit Margin of 21.38% is in the lower quartile for the Asset Management industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

PYPL

18.13%

Financial - Credit Services Industry

Max
77.26%
Q3
42.86%
Median
17.99%
Q1
10.82%
Min
-14.94%

PYPL’s Operating Profit Margin of 18.13% is around the midpoint for the Financial - Credit Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

AMP vs. PYPL: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Asset Management and Financial - Credit Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAMPPYPL
Return on Equity (TTM)56.06%22.32%
Return on Assets (TTM)1.67%5.59%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)38.36%13.24%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)17.14%14.27%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)21.38%18.13%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)100.00%45.36%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

AMP

38.84

Asset Management Industry

Max
12.44
Q3
5.76
Median
3.04
Q1
1.03
Min
0.01

AMP’s Current Ratio of 38.84 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Asset Management industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

PYPL

1.30

Financial - Credit Services Industry

Max
8.15
Q3
4.39
Median
2.62
Q1
1.06
Min
0.15

For the Financial - Credit Services industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

AMP vs. PYPL: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Asset Management and Financial - Credit Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

AMP

0.70

Asset Management Industry

Max
2.62
Q3
1.42
Median
0.76
Q1
0.34
Min
0.01

AMP’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.70 is typical for the Asset Management industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

PYPL

0.56

Financial - Credit Services Industry

Max
4.69
Q3
2.55
Median
1.20
Q1
0.55
Min
0.00

PYPL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.56 is typical for the Financial - Credit Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

AMP vs. PYPL: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Asset Management and Financial - Credit Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

AMP

11.42

Asset Management Industry

Max
13.30
Q3
6.30
Median
2.71
Q1
1.00
Min
-6.91

AMP’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 11.42 is in the upper quartile for the Asset Management industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

PYPL

19.52

Financial - Credit Services Industry

Max
17.48
Q3
7.42
Median
1.59
Q1
0.38
Min
-7.77

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial - Credit Services industry.

AMP vs. PYPL: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Asset Management and Financial - Credit Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAMPPYPL
Current Ratio (TTM)38.841.30
Quick Ratio (TTM)38.841.30
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.700.56
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.020.14
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)1.030.56
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)11.4219.52

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for AMP and PYPL. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

AMP vs. PYPL: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

AMP vs. PYPL: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

AMP vs. PYPL: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

AMP

1.11%

Asset Management Industry

Max
26.09%
Q3
11.60%
Median
6.37%
Q1
2.75%
Min
0.00%

AMP’s Dividend Yield of 1.11% is in the lower quartile for the Asset Management industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

PYPL

0.00%

Financial - Credit Services Industry

Max
14.68%
Q3
2.97%
Median
1.03%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

PYPL currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

AMP vs. PYPL: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Asset Management and Financial - Credit Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

AMP

19.37%

Asset Management Industry

Max
1,034.88%
Q3
127.70%
Median
75.15%
Q1
34.21%
Min
0.00%

AMP’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 19.37% is in the lower quartile for the Asset Management industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

PYPL

0.00%

Financial - Credit Services Industry

Max
169.58%
Q3
38.15%
Median
18.30%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

PYPL has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

AMP vs. PYPL: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Asset Management and Financial - Credit Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAMPPYPL
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.11%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)19.37%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

AMP

17.87

Asset Management Industry

Max
38.72
Q3
23.40
Median
11.45
Q1
8.80
Min
1.54

AMP’s P/E Ratio of 17.87 is within the middle range for the Asset Management industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

PYPL

16.61

Financial - Credit Services Industry

Max
42.04
Q3
25.88
Median
12.28
Q1
9.55
Min
3.09

PYPL’s P/E Ratio of 16.61 is within the middle range for the Financial - Credit Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

AMP vs. PYPL: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Asset Management and Financial - Credit Services industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

AMP

1.32

Asset Management Industry

Max
6.38
Q3
3.23
Median
1.55
Q1
0.89
Min
0.02

AMP’s Forward PEG Ratio of 1.32 is within the middle range of its peers in the Asset Management industry. This suggests a reasonable balance between the stock’s price and its expected growth, aligning with sector valuation norms.

PYPL

1.52

Financial - Credit Services Industry

Max
2.76
Q3
1.57
Median
0.82
Q1
0.51
Min
0.06

PYPL’s Forward PEG Ratio of 1.52 is within the middle range of its peers in the Financial - Credit Services industry. This suggests a reasonable balance between the stock’s price and its expected growth, aligning with sector valuation norms.

AMP vs. PYPL: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Asset Management and Financial - Credit Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

AMP

2.96

Asset Management Industry

Max
13.75
Q3
7.92
Median
4.87
Q1
3.51
Min
0.02

In the lower quartile for the Asset Management industry, AMP’s P/S Ratio of 2.96 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

PYPL

2.34

Financial - Credit Services Industry

Max
6.24
Q3
3.02
Median
1.54
Q1
0.75
Min
0.32

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial - Credit Services industry.

AMP vs. PYPL: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Asset Management and Financial - Credit Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

AMP

9.86

Asset Management Industry

Max
5.33
Q3
2.75
Median
1.06
Q1
0.87
Min
0.00

The P/B Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric for the Asset Management industry.

PYPL

3.73

Financial - Credit Services Industry

Max
3.58
Q3
2.84
Median
1.28
Q1
0.84
Min
0.07

At 3.73, PYPL’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Financial - Credit Services industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

AMP vs. PYPL: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Asset Management and Financial - Credit Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAMPPYPL
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)17.8716.61
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)1.321.52
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)2.962.34
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)9.863.73
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)7.7512.48
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)15.1211.13
EV-to-Sales (TTM)3.182.46