Seek Returns logo

AMP vs. KNSL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AMP and KNSL, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

AMP’s market capitalization of 51.73 billion USD is substantially larger than KNSL’s 11.10 billion USD, indicating a significant difference in their market valuations.

With betas of 1.23 for AMP and 1.20 for KNSL, both stocks show similar sensitivity to overall market movements.

SymbolAMPKNSL
Company NameAmeriprise Financial, Inc.Kinsale Capital Group, Inc.
CountryUSUS
SectorFinancial ServicesFinancial Services
IndustryAsset ManagementInsurance - Property & Casualty
CEOJames M. Cracchiolo CPAMichael Patrick Kehoe
Price543.3 USD476.16 USD
Market Cap51.73 billion USD11.10 billion USD
Beta1.231.20
ExchangeNYSENYSE
IPO DateSeptember 15, 2005July 28, 2016
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AMP and KNSL by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AMP vs. KNSL: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

AMP

56.06%

Asset Management Industry

Max
34.25%
Q3
18.22%
Median
11.24%
Q1
5.81%
Min
-5.72%

AMP’s Return on Equity of 56.06% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Asset Management industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

KNSL

28.14%

Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry

Max
28.14%
Q3
17.51%
Median
12.75%
Q1
8.26%
Min
0.61%

In the upper quartile for the Insurance - Property & Casualty industry, KNSL’s Return on Equity of 28.14% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

AMP vs. KNSL: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Asset Management and Insurance - Property & Casualty industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

AMP

38.36%

Asset Management Industry

Max
42.18%
Q3
20.06%
Median
8.68%
Q1
3.13%
Min
-16.42%

In the upper quartile for the Asset Management industry, AMP’s Return on Invested Capital of 38.36% signifies a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.

KNSL

10.13%

Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry

Max
21.89%
Q3
10.09%
Median
3.90%
Q1
0.89%
Min
-7.26%

Return on Invested Capital is often not a primary measure of capital efficiency in the Insurance - Property & Casualty industry.

AMP vs. KNSL: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Asset Management and Insurance - Property & Casualty industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

AMP

17.14%

Asset Management Industry

Max
91.66%
Q3
57.81%
Median
29.48%
Q1
15.70%
Min
-27.65%

AMP’s Net Profit Margin of 17.14% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Asset Management industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

KNSL

24.75%

Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry

Max
21.98%
Q3
13.09%
Median
9.18%
Q1
6.10%
Min
2.13%

KNSL’s Net Profit Margin of 24.75% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Insurance - Property & Casualty industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

AMP vs. KNSL: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Asset Management and Insurance - Property & Casualty industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

AMP

21.38%

Asset Management Industry

Max
99.76%
Q3
78.28%
Median
34.76%
Q1
21.75%
Min
-48.25%

AMP’s Operating Profit Margin of 21.38% is in the lower quartile for the Asset Management industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

KNSL

31.70%

Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry

Max
31.70%
Q3
17.32%
Median
12.57%
Q1
7.38%
Min
4.31%

An Operating Profit Margin of 31.70% places KNSL in the upper quartile for the Insurance - Property & Casualty industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

AMP vs. KNSL: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Asset Management and Insurance - Property & Casualty industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAMPKNSL
Return on Equity (TTM)56.06%28.14%
Return on Assets (TTM)1.67%7.77%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)38.36%10.13%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)17.14%24.75%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)21.38%31.70%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)100.00%100.07%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

AMP

38.84

Asset Management Industry

Max
12.44
Q3
5.76
Median
3.04
Q1
1.03
Min
0.01

AMP’s Current Ratio of 38.84 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Asset Management industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

KNSL

--

Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry

Max
51.52
Q3
30.84
Median
20.50
Q1
6.61
Min
0.41

Current Ratio data for KNSL is currently unavailable.

AMP vs. KNSL: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Asset Management and Insurance - Property & Casualty industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

AMP

0.70

Asset Management Industry

Max
2.62
Q3
1.42
Median
0.76
Q1
0.34
Min
0.01

AMP’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.70 is typical for the Asset Management industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

KNSL

--

Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry

Max
0.58
Q3
0.36
Median
0.27
Q1
0.14
Min
0.01

Debt-to-Equity Ratio data for KNSL is currently unavailable.

AMP vs. KNSL: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Asset Management and Insurance - Property & Casualty industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

AMP

11.42

Asset Management Industry

Max
13.30
Q3
6.30
Median
2.71
Q1
1.00
Min
-6.91

AMP’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 11.42 is in the upper quartile for the Asset Management industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

KNSL

50.62

Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry

Max
39.40
Q3
22.24
Median
12.38
Q1
6.68
Min
-12.40

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 50.62, KNSL demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Insurance - Property & Casualty industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

AMP vs. KNSL: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Asset Management and Insurance - Property & Casualty industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAMPKNSL
Current Ratio (TTM)38.84--
Quick Ratio (TTM)38.84--
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.70--
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.02--
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)1.03-0.29
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)11.4250.62

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for AMP and KNSL. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

AMP vs. KNSL: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

AMP vs. KNSL: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

AMP vs. KNSL: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

AMP

1.11%

Asset Management Industry

Max
26.09%
Q3
11.60%
Median
6.37%
Q1
2.75%
Min
0.00%

AMP’s Dividend Yield of 1.11% is in the lower quartile for the Asset Management industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

KNSL

0.13%

Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry

Max
8.17%
Q3
3.10%
Median
1.79%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

KNSL’s Dividend Yield of 0.13% is consistent with its peers in the Insurance - Property & Casualty industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

AMP vs. KNSL: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Asset Management and Insurance - Property & Casualty industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

AMP

19.37%

Asset Management Industry

Max
1,034.88%
Q3
127.70%
Median
75.15%
Q1
34.21%
Min
0.00%

AMP’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 19.37% is in the lower quartile for the Asset Management industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

KNSL

3.56%

Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry

Max
115.20%
Q3
35.27%
Median
22.19%
Q1
3.16%
Min
0.00%

KNSL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 3.56% is within the typical range for the Insurance - Property & Casualty industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

AMP vs. KNSL: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Asset Management and Insurance - Property & Casualty industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAMPKNSL
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.11%0.13%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)19.37%3.56%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

AMP

17.87

Asset Management Industry

Max
38.72
Q3
23.40
Median
11.45
Q1
8.80
Min
1.54

AMP’s P/E Ratio of 17.87 is within the middle range for the Asset Management industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

KNSL

27.23

Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry

Max
35.83
Q3
23.28
Median
14.49
Q1
11.91
Min
4.47

A P/E Ratio of 27.23 places KNSL in the upper quartile for the Insurance - Property & Casualty industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

AMP vs. KNSL: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Asset Management and Insurance - Property & Casualty industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

AMP

1.32

Asset Management Industry

Max
6.38
Q3
3.23
Median
1.55
Q1
0.89
Min
0.02

AMP’s Forward PEG Ratio of 1.32 is within the middle range of its peers in the Asset Management industry. This suggests a reasonable balance between the stock’s price and its expected growth, aligning with sector valuation norms.

KNSL

1.95

Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry

Max
2.53
Q3
1.90
Median
1.33
Q1
0.86
Min
0.01

A Forward PEG Ratio of 1.95 places KNSL in the upper quartile for the Insurance - Property & Casualty industry. This suggests the stock is potentially expensive compared to its peers relative to its growth forecast, which may warrant caution.

AMP vs. KNSL: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Asset Management and Insurance - Property & Casualty industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

AMP

2.96

Asset Management Industry

Max
13.75
Q3
7.92
Median
4.87
Q1
3.51
Min
0.02

In the lower quartile for the Asset Management industry, AMP’s P/S Ratio of 2.96 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

KNSL

6.78

Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry

Max
3.76
Q3
2.39
Median
1.80
Q1
1.01
Min
0.50

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Insurance - Property & Casualty industry.

AMP vs. KNSL: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Asset Management and Insurance - Property & Casualty industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

AMP

9.86

Asset Management Industry

Max
5.33
Q3
2.75
Median
1.06
Q1
0.87
Min
0.00

The P/B Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric for the Asset Management industry.

KNSL

6.97

Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry

Max
5.34
Q3
2.95
Median
1.92
Q1
1.31
Min
0.52

At 6.97, KNSL’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Insurance - Property & Casualty industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

AMP vs. KNSL: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Asset Management and Insurance - Property & Casualty industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAMPKNSL
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)17.8727.23
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)1.321.95
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)2.966.78
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)9.866.97
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)7.7511.52
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)15.1222.24
EV-to-Sales (TTM)3.186.69