Seek Returns logo

AMP vs. FITB: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AMP and FITB, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

AMP’s market capitalization of 51.73 billion USD is substantially larger than FITB’s 28.97 billion USD, indicating a significant difference in their market valuations.

With betas of 1.23 for AMP and 0.92 for FITB, both stocks show similar sensitivity to overall market movements.

SymbolAMPFITB
Company NameAmeriprise Financial, Inc.Fifth Third Bancorp
CountryUSUS
SectorFinancial ServicesFinancial Services
IndustryAsset ManagementBanks - Regional
CEOJames M. Cracchiolo CPATimothy N. Spence
Price543.3 USD43.4 USD
Market Cap51.73 billion USD28.97 billion USD
Beta1.230.92
ExchangeNYSENASDAQ
IPO DateSeptember 15, 2005March 17, 1980
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AMP and FITB by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AMP vs. FITB: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

AMP

56.06%

Asset Management Industry

Max
34.25%
Q3
18.22%
Median
11.24%
Q1
5.81%
Min
-5.72%

AMP’s Return on Equity of 56.06% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Asset Management industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

FITB

11.54%

Banks - Regional Industry

Max
19.20%
Q3
11.87%
Median
9.48%
Q1
6.66%
Min
-0.15%

FITB’s Return on Equity of 11.54% is on par with the norm for the Banks - Regional industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

AMP vs. FITB: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Asset Management and Banks - Regional industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

AMP

38.36%

Asset Management Industry

Max
42.18%
Q3
20.06%
Median
8.68%
Q1
3.13%
Min
-16.42%

In the upper quartile for the Asset Management industry, AMP’s Return on Invested Capital of 38.36% signifies a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.

FITB

4.90%

Banks - Regional Industry

Max
13.33%
Q3
7.16%
Median
5.31%
Q1
2.87%
Min
-3.49%

Return on Invested Capital is often not a primary measure of capital efficiency in the Banks - Regional industry.

AMP vs. FITB: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Asset Management and Banks - Regional industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

AMP

17.14%

Asset Management Industry

Max
91.66%
Q3
57.81%
Median
29.48%
Q1
15.70%
Min
-27.65%

AMP’s Net Profit Margin of 17.14% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Asset Management industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

FITB

17.93%

Banks - Regional Industry

Max
32.03%
Q3
21.35%
Median
16.99%
Q1
12.69%
Min
0.27%

FITB’s Net Profit Margin of 17.93% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Banks - Regional industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

AMP vs. FITB: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Asset Management and Banks - Regional industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

AMP

21.38%

Asset Management Industry

Max
99.76%
Q3
78.28%
Median
34.76%
Q1
21.75%
Min
-48.25%

AMP’s Operating Profit Margin of 21.38% is in the lower quartile for the Asset Management industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

FITB

22.59%

Banks - Regional Industry

Max
40.01%
Q3
26.24%
Median
21.14%
Q1
15.85%
Min
1.50%

FITB’s Operating Profit Margin of 22.59% is around the midpoint for the Banks - Regional industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

AMP vs. FITB: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Asset Management and Banks - Regional industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAMPFITB
Return on Equity (TTM)56.06%11.54%
Return on Assets (TTM)1.67%1.09%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)38.36%4.90%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)17.14%17.93%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)21.38%22.59%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)100.00%59.80%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

AMP

38.84

Asset Management Industry

Max
12.44
Q3
5.76
Median
3.04
Q1
1.03
Min
0.01

AMP’s Current Ratio of 38.84 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Asset Management industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

FITB

0.35

Banks - Regional Industry

Max
0.39
Q3
0.22
Median
0.15
Q1
0.10
Min
0.01

For the Banks - Regional industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

AMP vs. FITB: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Asset Management and Banks - Regional industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

AMP

0.70

Asset Management Industry

Max
2.62
Q3
1.42
Median
0.76
Q1
0.34
Min
0.01

AMP’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.70 is typical for the Asset Management industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

FITB

0.99

Banks - Regional Industry

Max
1.74
Q3
0.81
Median
0.42
Q1
0.18
Min
0.00

FITB’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Banks - Regional industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.99. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

AMP vs. FITB: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Asset Management and Banks - Regional industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

AMP

11.42

Asset Management Industry

Max
13.30
Q3
6.30
Median
2.71
Q1
1.00
Min
-6.91

AMP’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 11.42 is in the upper quartile for the Asset Management industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

FITB

0.64

Banks - Regional Industry

Max
1.58
Q3
0.84
Median
0.59
Q1
0.35
Min
-0.35

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Banks - Regional industry.

AMP vs. FITB: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Asset Management and Banks - Regional industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAMPFITB
Current Ratio (TTM)38.840.35
Quick Ratio (TTM)38.840.35
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.700.99
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.020.10
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)1.035.05
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)11.420.64

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for AMP and FITB. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

AMP vs. FITB: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

AMP vs. FITB: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

AMP vs. FITB: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

AMP

1.11%

Asset Management Industry

Max
26.09%
Q3
11.60%
Median
6.37%
Q1
2.75%
Min
0.00%

AMP’s Dividend Yield of 1.11% is in the lower quartile for the Asset Management industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

FITB

3.41%

Banks - Regional Industry

Max
11.72%
Q3
4.07%
Median
3.00%
Q1
1.68%
Min
0.00%

FITB’s Dividend Yield of 3.41% is consistent with its peers in the Banks - Regional industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

AMP vs. FITB: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Asset Management and Banks - Regional industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

AMP

19.37%

Asset Management Industry

Max
1,034.88%
Q3
127.70%
Median
75.15%
Q1
34.21%
Min
0.00%

AMP’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 19.37% is in the lower quartile for the Asset Management industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

FITB

51.36%

Banks - Regional Industry

Max
155.35%
Q3
50.05%
Median
34.14%
Q1
18.61%
Min
0.00%

FITB’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 51.36% is in the upper quartile for the Banks - Regional industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

AMP vs. FITB: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Asset Management and Banks - Regional industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAMPFITB
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.11%3.41%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)19.37%51.36%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

AMP

17.87

Asset Management Industry

Max
38.72
Q3
23.40
Median
11.45
Q1
8.80
Min
1.54

AMP’s P/E Ratio of 17.87 is within the middle range for the Asset Management industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

FITB

12.61

Banks - Regional Industry

Max
22.32
Q3
15.38
Median
12.31
Q1
10.72
Min
4.30

FITB’s P/E Ratio of 12.61 is within the middle range for the Banks - Regional industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

AMP vs. FITB: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Asset Management and Banks - Regional industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

AMP

1.32

Asset Management Industry

Max
6.38
Q3
3.23
Median
1.55
Q1
0.89
Min
0.02

AMP’s Forward PEG Ratio of 1.32 is within the middle range of its peers in the Asset Management industry. This suggests a reasonable balance between the stock’s price and its expected growth, aligning with sector valuation norms.

FITB

0.98

Banks - Regional Industry

Max
4.03
Q3
2.13
Median
1.25
Q1
0.71
Min
0.02

FITB’s Forward PEG Ratio of 0.98 is within the middle range of its peers in the Banks - Regional industry. This suggests a reasonable balance between the stock’s price and its expected growth, aligning with sector valuation norms.

AMP vs. FITB: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Asset Management and Banks - Regional industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

AMP

2.96

Asset Management Industry

Max
13.75
Q3
7.92
Median
4.87
Q1
3.51
Min
0.02

In the lower quartile for the Asset Management industry, AMP’s P/S Ratio of 2.96 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

FITB

2.25

Banks - Regional Industry

Max
4.28
Q3
2.76
Median
2.17
Q1
1.71
Min
0.55

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Banks - Regional industry.

AMP vs. FITB: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Asset Management and Banks - Regional industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

AMP

9.86

Asset Management Industry

Max
5.33
Q3
2.75
Median
1.06
Q1
0.87
Min
0.00

The P/B Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric for the Asset Management industry.

FITB

1.43

Banks - Regional Industry

Max
1.99
Q3
1.35
Median
1.09
Q1
0.92
Min
0.33

FITB’s P/B Ratio of 1.43 is in the upper tier for the Banks - Regional industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

AMP vs. FITB: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Asset Management and Banks - Regional industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAMPFITB
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)17.8712.61
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)1.320.98
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)2.962.25
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)9.861.43
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)7.759.08
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)15.1213.54
EV-to-Sales (TTM)3.183.59