Seek Returns logo

AMH vs. JLL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AMH and JLL, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

AMH’s market capitalization stands at 13.16 billion USD, while JLL’s is 12.37 billion USD, indicating their market valuations are broadly comparable.

JLL carries a higher beta at 1.32, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while AMH (beta: 0.77) exhibits greater stability.

SymbolAMHJLL
Company NameAmerican Homes 4 RentJones Lang LaSalle Incorporated
CountryUSUS
SectorReal EstateReal Estate
IndustryREIT - ResidentialReal Estate - Services
CEOBryan SmithChristian Ulbrich
Price35.6 USD260.64 USD
Market Cap13.16 billion USD12.37 billion USD
Beta0.771.32
ExchangeNYSENYSE
IPO DateAugust 1, 2013July 17, 1997
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AMH and JLL by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AMH vs. JLL: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

AMH

5.78%

REIT - Residential Industry

Max
23.34%
Q3
9.08%
Median
3.28%
Q1
-1.03%
Min
-7.42%

Return on Equity is often not a primary performance indicator in the REIT - Residential industry.

JLL

8.05%

Real Estate - Services Industry

Max
11.91%
Q3
9.21%
Median
1.80%
Q1
-6.57%
Min
-12.86%

JLL’s Return on Equity of 8.05% is on par with the norm for the Real Estate - Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

AMH vs. JLL: A comparison of their ROE against their respective REIT - Residential and Real Estate - Services industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

AMH

4.43%

REIT - Residential Industry

Max
5.46%
Q3
5.07%
Median
3.70%
Q1
2.44%
Min
-1.04%

Return on Invested Capital is often not a primary measure of capital efficiency in the REIT - Residential industry.

JLL

5.99%

Real Estate - Services Industry

Max
24.08%
Q3
6.27%
Median
3.51%
Q1
-7.42%
Min
-22.36%

JLL’s Return on Invested Capital of 5.99% is in line with the norm for the Real Estate - Services industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

AMH vs. JLL: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective REIT - Residential and Real Estate - Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

AMH

23.15%

REIT - Residential Industry

Max
38.86%
Q3
24.60%
Median
7.62%
Q1
-2.65%
Min
-12.57%

In the REIT - Residential industry, Net Profit Margin is often not the primary profitability metric.

JLL

2.23%

Real Estate - Services Industry

Max
9.09%
Q3
2.89%
Median
2.32%
Q1
-1.64%
Min
-7.18%

JLL’s Net Profit Margin of 2.23% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Real Estate - Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

AMH vs. JLL: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective REIT - Residential and Real Estate - Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

AMH

24.05%

REIT - Residential Industry

Max
45.77%
Q3
30.12%
Median
19.58%
Q1
17.52%
Min
8.22%

In the REIT - Residential industry, Operating Profit Margin is often not the primary measure of operational efficiency.

JLL

3.63%

Real Estate - Services Industry

Max
20.42%
Q3
7.02%
Median
3.99%
Q1
-3.44%
Min
-16.39%

JLL’s Operating Profit Margin of 3.63% is around the midpoint for the Real Estate - Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

AMH vs. JLL: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective REIT - Residential and Real Estate - Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAMHJLL
Return on Equity (TTM)5.78%8.05%
Return on Assets (TTM)3.08%3.22%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)4.43%5.99%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)23.15%2.23%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)24.05%3.63%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)56.17%88.07%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

AMH

0.07

REIT - Residential Industry

Max
2.65
Q3
2.05
Median
0.62
Q1
0.13
Min
0.05

For the REIT - Residential industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

JLL

1.09

Real Estate - Services Industry

Max
3.77
Q3
2.87
Median
1.40
Q1
1.11
Min
0.31

JLL’s Current Ratio of 1.09 falls into the lower quartile for the Real Estate - Services industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

AMH vs. JLL: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective REIT - Residential and Real Estate - Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

AMH

0.69

REIT - Residential Industry

Max
1.76
Q3
1.60
Median
1.15
Q1
0.71
Min
0.06

Falling into the lower quartile for the REIT - Residential industry, AMH’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.69 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

JLL

0.54

Real Estate - Services Industry

Max
2.11
Q3
1.66
Median
0.54
Q1
0.24
Min
0.00

JLL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.54 is typical for the Real Estate - Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

AMH vs. JLL: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective REIT - Residential and Real Estate - Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

AMH

2.47

REIT - Residential Industry

Max
4.02
Q3
3.42
Median
2.09
Q1
0.77
Min
-0.24

AMH’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.47 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the REIT - Residential industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

JLL

12.80

Real Estate - Services Industry

Max
12.80
Q3
6.13
Median
2.49
Q1
-1.96
Min
-9.17

JLL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 12.80 is in the upper quartile for the Real Estate - Services industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

AMH vs. JLL: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective REIT - Residential and Real Estate - Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAMHJLL
Current Ratio (TTM)0.071.09
Quick Ratio (TTM)0.071.09
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.690.54
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.370.22
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)5.592.75
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)2.4712.80

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for AMH and JLL. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

AMH vs. JLL: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

AMH vs. JLL: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

AMH vs. JLL: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

AMH

3.15%

REIT - Residential Industry

Max
6.90%
Q3
5.06%
Median
3.70%
Q1
3.35%
Min
1.32%

AMH’s Dividend Yield of 3.15% is in the lower quartile for the REIT - Residential industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

JLL

0.00%

Real Estate - Services Industry

Max
10.79%
Q3
1.45%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

JLL currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

AMH vs. JLL: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective REIT - Residential and Real Estate - Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

AMH

72.77%

REIT - Residential Industry

Max
647.59%
Q3
358.74%
Median
123.11%
Q1
73.29%
Min
0.00%

AMH’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 72.77% is in the lower quartile for the REIT - Residential industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

JLL

0.00%

Real Estate - Services Industry

Max
34.56%
Q3
3.97%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

JLL has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

AMH vs. JLL: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective REIT - Residential and Real Estate - Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAMHJLL
Dividend Yield (TTM)3.15%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)72.77%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

AMH

32.19

REIT - Residential Industry

Max
209.03
Q3
105.65
Median
37.25
Q1
29.74
Min
25.36

The P/E Ratio is often not the primary metric for valuation in the REIT - Residential industry.

JLL

23.08

Real Estate - Services Industry

Max
76.80
Q3
59.95
Median
42.42
Q1
19.27
Min
12.83

JLL’s P/E Ratio of 23.08 is within the middle range for the Real Estate - Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

AMH vs. JLL: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective REIT - Residential and Real Estate - Services industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

AMH

-0.32

REIT - Residential Industry

Max
8.96
Q3
6.40
Median
3.83
Q1
0.72
Min
0.26

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the REIT - Residential industry.

JLL

1.42

Real Estate - Services Industry

Max
13.06
Q3
6.50
Median
1.45
Q1
0.67
Min
0.01

JLL’s Forward PEG Ratio of 1.42 is within the middle range of its peers in the Real Estate - Services industry. This suggests a reasonable balance between the stock’s price and its expected growth, aligning with sector valuation norms.

AMH vs. JLL: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective REIT - Residential and Real Estate - Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

AMH

7.43

REIT - Residential Industry

Max
10.14
Q3
8.03
Median
7.51
Q1
5.76
Min
3.29

AMH’s P/S Ratio of 7.43 aligns with the market consensus for the REIT - Residential industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

JLL

0.51

Real Estate - Services Industry

Max
1.84
Q3
1.80
Median
1.22
Q1
0.65
Min
0.07

In the lower quartile for the Real Estate - Services industry, JLL’s P/S Ratio of 0.51 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

AMH vs. JLL: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective REIT - Residential and Real Estate - Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

AMH

1.84

REIT - Residential Industry

Max
4.04
Q3
3.00
Median
2.31
Q1
1.78
Min
0.81

AMH’s P/B Ratio of 1.84 is within the conventional range for the REIT - Residential industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

JLL

1.81

Real Estate - Services Industry

Max
6.77
Q3
5.49
Median
1.72
Q1
0.71
Min
0.28

The P/B Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric for the Real Estate - Services industry.

AMH vs. JLL: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective REIT - Residential and Real Estate - Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAMHJLL
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)32.1923.08
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)-0.321.42
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)7.430.51
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)1.841.81
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)18.6819.39
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)20.6913.22
EV-to-Sales (TTM)10.190.65