Seek Returns logo

AMH vs. DUO: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AMH and DUO, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

A key difference in structure is that AMH is a Real Estate Investment Trust (REIT), a company that primarily invests in income-generating real estate, whereas DUO is a conventional stock.

SymbolAMHDUO
Company NameAmerican Homes 4 RentFangdd Network Group Ltd.
CountryUnited StatesChina
GICS SectorReal EstateCommunication Services
GICS IndustryResidential REITsInteractive Media & Services
Market Capitalization13.77 billion USD0.03 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqCM
Listing DateAugust 1, 2013November 1, 2019
Security TypeREITCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AMH and DUO by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AMH vs. DUO: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolAMHDUO
5-Day Price Return-0.21%0.29%
13-Week Price Return-8.17%44.63%
26-Week Price Return-12.29%-21.88%
52-Week Price Return-13.82%-91.35%
Month-to-Date Return-1.92%2.04%
Year-to-Date Return-12.85%-63.43%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.82M0.67M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.37M1.67M
3-Month Volatility18.34%204.87%
Beta0.832.87

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

AMH

5.99%

Residential REITs Industry

Max
17.50%
Q3
9.60%
Median
6.78%
Q1
3.88%
Min
-0.69%

AMH’s Return on Equity of 5.99% is on par with the norm for the Residential REITs industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

DUO

-6.44%

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
49.37%
Q3
33.08%
Median
10.37%
Q1
5.76%
Min
-24.17%

DUO has a negative Return on Equity of -6.44%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

AMH vs. DUO: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Residential REITs and Interactive Media & Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

AMH

23.72%

Residential REITs Industry

Max
53.28%
Q3
43.51%
Median
25.98%
Q1
9.99%
Min
-0.30%

In the Residential REITs industry, Net Profit Margin is often not the primary profitability metric.

DUO

-6.13%

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
49.74%
Q3
29.54%
Median
20.53%
Q1
7.52%
Min
-14.52%

DUO has a negative Net Profit Margin of -6.13%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

AMH vs. DUO: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Residential REITs and Interactive Media & Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

AMH

13.07%

Residential REITs Industry

Max
54.66%
Q3
47.76%
Median
29.76%
Q1
18.99%
Min
-0.66%

In the Residential REITs industry, Operating Profit Margin is often not the primary measure of operational efficiency.

DUO

-32.65%

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
65.96%
Q3
36.82%
Median
18.53%
Q1
7.69%
Min
-18.13%

DUO has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -32.65%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

AMH vs. DUO: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Residential REITs and Interactive Media & Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAMHDUO
Return on Equity (TTM)5.99%-6.44%
Return on Assets (TTM)3.21%-3.50%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)23.72%-6.13%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)13.07%-32.65%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)56.50%15.59%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

AMH

0.64

Residential REITs Industry

Max
1.58
Q3
0.84
Median
0.56
Q1
0.10
Min
0.00

AMH’s Current Ratio of 0.64 aligns with the median group of the Residential REITs industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

DUO

1.66

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
3.92
Q3
2.72
Median
1.85
Q1
1.20
Min
0.25

DUO’s Current Ratio of 1.66 aligns with the median group of the Interactive Media & Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

AMH vs. DUO: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Residential REITs and Interactive Media & Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

AMH

0.72

Residential REITs Industry

Max
1.64
Q3
1.10
Median
0.83
Q1
0.68
Min
0.28

AMH’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.72 is typical for the Residential REITs industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

DUO

0.03

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
0.85
Q3
0.49
Median
0.29
Q1
0.04
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Interactive Media & Services industry, DUO’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.03 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

AMH vs. DUO: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Residential REITs and Interactive Media & Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

AMH

2.53

Residential REITs Industry

Max
5.11
Q3
4.01
Median
2.53
Q1
1.52
Min
0.52

AMH’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.53 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Residential REITs industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

DUO

3.98

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
23.65
Q3
16.48
Median
6.73
Q1
-0.87
Min
-3.62

DUO’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.98 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Interactive Media & Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

AMH vs. DUO: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Residential REITs and Interactive Media & Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAMHDUO
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.641.66
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.641.31
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.720.03
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)2.533.98

Growth

Revenue Growth

AMH vs. DUO: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

AMH vs. DUO: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

AMH

3.58%

Residential REITs Industry

Max
4.67%
Q3
4.30%
Median
3.71%
Q1
3.53%
Min
3.04%

AMH’s Dividend Yield of 3.58% is consistent with its peers in the Residential REITs industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

DUO

0.00%

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
3.07%
Q3
1.27%
Median
0.28%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

DUO currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

AMH vs. DUO: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Residential REITs and Interactive Media & Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

AMH

100.80%

Residential REITs Industry

Max
214.13%
Q3
138.72%
Median
103.63%
Q1
84.15%
Min
22.05%

AMH’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 100.80% is within the typical range for the Residential REITs industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

DUO

0.00%

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
101.53%
Q3
40.64%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

DUO has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

AMH vs. DUO: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Residential REITs and Interactive Media & Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAMHDUO
Dividend Yield (TTM)3.58%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)100.80%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

AMH

28.16

Residential REITs Industry

Max
76.72
Q3
44.45
Median
28.89
Q1
22.94
Min
9.90

The P/E Ratio is often not the primary metric for valuation in the Residential REITs industry.

DUO

--

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
50.72
Q3
41.60
Median
25.84
Q1
18.18
Min
1.76

P/E Ratio data for DUO is currently unavailable.

AMH vs. DUO: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Residential REITs and Interactive Media & Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

AMH

6.68

Residential REITs Industry

Max
13.08
Q3
9.23
Median
7.38
Q1
6.12
Min
5.65

AMH’s P/S Ratio of 6.68 aligns with the market consensus for the Residential REITs industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

DUO

0.24

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
23.76
Q3
11.40
Median
7.69
Q1
2.49
Min
0.00

In the lower quartile for the Interactive Media & Services industry, DUO’s P/S Ratio of 0.24 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

AMH vs. DUO: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Residential REITs and Interactive Media & Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

AMH

1.86

Residential REITs Industry

Max
4.07
Q3
2.62
Median
2.08
Q1
1.46
Min
0.68

AMH’s P/B Ratio of 1.86 is within the conventional range for the Residential REITs industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

DUO

0.16

Interactive Media & Services Industry

Max
16.71
Q3
9.00
Median
3.97
Q1
2.19
Min
0.33

DUO’s P/B Ratio of 0.16 is below the established floor for the Interactive Media & Services industry. This may signal that the market is deeply pessimistic or has overlooked the company, potentially offering its asset base at a significant discount.

AMH vs. DUO: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Residential REITs and Interactive Media & Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAMHDUO
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)28.16--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)6.680.24
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.860.16
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)3,235.470.58