Seek Returns logo

AMH vs. CCI: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AMH and CCI, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Both AMH and CCI are Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs). These entities are required to distribute the majority of their taxable income to shareholders, often resulting in higher dividend yields.

SymbolAMHCCI
Company NameAmerican Homes 4 RentCrown Castle Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorReal EstateReal Estate
GICS IndustryResidential REITsSpecialized REITs
Market Capitalization13.78 billion USD40.93 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateAugust 1, 2013August 18, 1998
Security TypeREITREIT

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AMH and CCI by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AMH vs. CCI: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolAMHCCI
5-Day Price Return0.52%-2.59%
13-Week Price Return-8.31%-7.72%
26-Week Price Return-13.67%-10.15%
52-Week Price Return-14.40%-17.76%
Month-to-Date Return-1.83%-2.59%
Year-to-Date Return-12.77%3.56%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.98M2.71M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.38M3.33M
3-Month Volatility18.31%21.75%
Beta0.830.98

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

AMH

5.99%

Residential REITs Industry

Max
17.50%
Q3
9.60%
Median
6.78%
Q1
3.88%
Min
-0.69%

AMH’s Return on Equity of 5.99% is on par with the norm for the Residential REITs industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

CCI

21.01%

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
21.01%
Q3
17.78%
Median
8.42%
Q1
6.83%
Min
-1.71%

In the upper quartile for the Specialized REITs industry, CCI’s Return on Equity of 21.01% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

AMH vs. CCI: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Residential REITs and Specialized REITs industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

AMH

23.72%

Residential REITs Industry

Max
53.28%
Q3
43.51%
Median
25.98%
Q1
9.99%
Min
-0.30%

In the Residential REITs industry, Net Profit Margin is often not the primary profitability metric.

CCI

-85.54%

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
70.20%
Q3
38.00%
Median
23.98%
Q1
6.53%
Min
-1.41%

In the Specialized REITs industry, Net Profit Margin is often not the primary profitability metric.

AMH vs. CCI: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Residential REITs and Specialized REITs industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

AMH

13.07%

Residential REITs Industry

Max
54.66%
Q3
47.76%
Median
29.76%
Q1
18.99%
Min
-0.66%

In the Residential REITs industry, Operating Profit Margin is often not the primary measure of operational efficiency.

CCI

-54.11%

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
107.13%
Q3
54.03%
Median
42.12%
Q1
16.28%
Min
5.86%

In the Specialized REITs industry, Operating Profit Margin is often not the primary measure of operational efficiency.

AMH vs. CCI: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Residential REITs and Specialized REITs industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAMHCCI
Return on Equity (TTM)5.99%21.01%
Return on Assets (TTM)3.21%-13.83%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)23.72%-85.54%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)13.07%-54.11%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)56.50%72.89%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

AMH

0.64

Residential REITs Industry

Max
1.58
Q3
0.84
Median
0.56
Q1
0.10
Min
0.00

AMH’s Current Ratio of 0.64 aligns with the median group of the Residential REITs industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CCI

0.28

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
1.74
Q3
1.08
Median
0.58
Q1
0.34
Min
0.10

CCI’s Current Ratio of 0.28 falls into the lower quartile for the Specialized REITs industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

AMH vs. CCI: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Residential REITs and Specialized REITs industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

AMH

0.72

Residential REITs Industry

Max
1.64
Q3
1.10
Median
0.83
Q1
0.68
Min
0.28

AMH’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.72 is typical for the Residential REITs industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

CCI

4.54

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
5.86
Q3
3.80
Median
1.22
Q1
0.73
Min
0.16

CCI’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Specialized REITs industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 4.54. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

AMH vs. CCI: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Residential REITs and Specialized REITs industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

AMH

2.53

Residential REITs Industry

Max
5.11
Q3
4.01
Median
2.53
Q1
1.52
Min
0.52

AMH’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.53 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Residential REITs industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CCI

-3.25

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
5.24
Q3
3.92
Median
2.94
Q1
2.07
Min
1.14

CCI has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -3.25. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

AMH vs. CCI: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Residential REITs and Specialized REITs industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAMHCCI
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.640.28
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.640.26
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.724.54
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)2.53-3.25

Growth

Revenue Growth

AMH vs. CCI: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

AMH vs. CCI: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

AMH

3.55%

Residential REITs Industry

Max
4.67%
Q3
4.30%
Median
3.71%
Q1
3.53%
Min
3.04%

AMH’s Dividend Yield of 3.55% is consistent with its peers in the Residential REITs industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CCI

6.05%

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
6.92%
Q3
5.29%
Median
4.71%
Q1
3.25%
Min
2.16%

With a Dividend Yield of 6.05%, CCI offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Specialized REITs industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

AMH vs. CCI: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Residential REITs and Specialized REITs industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

AMH

100.80%

Residential REITs Industry

Max
214.13%
Q3
138.72%
Median
103.63%
Q1
84.15%
Min
22.05%

AMH’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 100.80% is within the typical range for the Residential REITs industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CCI

192.59%

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
338.69%
Q3
202.75%
Median
125.21%
Q1
107.89%
Min
16.73%

CCI’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 192.59% is within the typical range for the Specialized REITs industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

AMH vs. CCI: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Residential REITs and Specialized REITs industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAMHCCI
Dividend Yield (TTM)3.55%6.05%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)100.80%192.59%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

AMH

28.42

Residential REITs Industry

Max
76.72
Q3
44.45
Median
28.89
Q1
22.94
Min
9.90

The P/E Ratio is often not the primary metric for valuation in the Residential REITs industry.

CCI

--

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
119.95
Q3
64.19
Median
27.78
Q1
23.88
Min
5.25

The P/E Ratio is often not the primary metric for valuation in the Specialized REITs industry.

AMH vs. CCI: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Residential REITs and Specialized REITs industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

AMH

6.74

Residential REITs Industry

Max
13.08
Q3
9.23
Median
7.38
Q1
6.12
Min
5.65

AMH’s P/S Ratio of 6.74 aligns with the market consensus for the Residential REITs industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

CCI

7.67

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
10.35
Q3
8.84
Median
8.28
Q1
5.39
Min
1.68

CCI’s P/S Ratio of 7.67 aligns with the market consensus for the Specialized REITs industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

AMH vs. CCI: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Residential REITs and Specialized REITs industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

AMH

1.86

Residential REITs Industry

Max
4.07
Q3
2.62
Median
2.08
Q1
1.46
Min
0.68

AMH’s P/B Ratio of 1.86 is within the conventional range for the Residential REITs industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

CCI

9.74

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
13.73
Q3
7.48
Median
2.56
Q1
1.70
Min
0.71

CCI’s P/B Ratio of 9.74 is in the upper tier for the Specialized REITs industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

AMH vs. CCI: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Residential REITs and Specialized REITs industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAMHCCI
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)28.42--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)6.747.67
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.869.74
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)3,265.4517.35