AMH vs. ARE: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on August 24, 2025

Here’s a clear look at AMH and ARE, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Both AMH and ARE are Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs). These entities are required to distribute the majority of their taxable income to shareholders, often resulting in higher dividend yields.

Symbol	AMH	ARE
Company Name	American Homes 4 Rent	Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc.
Country	United States	United States
GICS Sector	Real Estate	Real Estate
GICS Industry	Residential REITs	Office REITs
Market Capitalization	14.82 billion USD	13.22 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	August 1, 2013	May 28, 1997
Security Type	REIT	REIT

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AMH and ARE by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AMH vs. ARE: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	AMH	ARE
5-Day Price Return	1.45%	4.39%
13-Week Price Return	-9.52%	7.44%
26-Week Price Return	-2.07%	-17.81%
52-Week Price Return	-9.00%	-31.76%
Month-to-Date Return	1.15%	2.41%
Year-to-Date Return	-6.23%	-19.76%
10-Day Avg. Volume	1.76M	1.73M
3-Month Avg. Volume	2.06M	1.75M
3-Month Volatility	16.11%	31.33%
Beta	0.78	1.33

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

AMH

5.99%

Residential REITs Industry

Max: 12.21%
Q3: 9.45%
Median: 7.42%
Q1: 2.50%
Min: 0.37%

AMH’s Return on Equity of 5.99% is on par with the norm for the Residential REITs industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

ARE

-0.06%

Office REITs Industry

Max: 9.47%
Q3: 6.07%
Median: 3.22%
Q1: 0.83%
Min: -0.08%

ARE has a negative Return on Equity of -0.06%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

AMH vs. ARE: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Residential REITs and Office REITs industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

AMH

23.72%

Residential REITs Industry

Max: 67.49%
Q3: 38.86%
Median: 25.74%
Q1: 7.62%
Min: 0.15%

In the Residential REITs industry, Net Profit Margin is often not the primary profitability metric.

ARE

-0.32%

Office REITs Industry

Max: 74.75%
Q3: 44.46%
Median: 31.39%
Q1: 5.85%
Min: -0.35%

In the Office REITs industry, Net Profit Margin is often not the primary profitability metric.

AMH vs. ARE: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Residential REITs and Office REITs industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

AMH

13.07%

Residential REITs Industry

Max: 54.06%
Q3: 45.82%
Median: 29.89%
Q1: 19.34%
Min: 5.28%

In the Residential REITs industry, Operating Profit Margin is often not the primary measure of operational efficiency.

ARE

12.67%

Office REITs Industry

Max: 91.62%
Q3: 51.67%
Median: 42.78%
Q1: 23.56%
Min: 14.93%

In the Office REITs industry, Operating Profit Margin is often not the primary measure of operational efficiency.

AMH vs. ARE: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Residential REITs and Office REITs industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	AMH	ARE
Return on Equity (TTM)	5.99%	-0.06%
Return on Assets (TTM)	3.21%	-0.03%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	23.72%	-0.32%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	13.07%	12.67%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	56.50%	71.25%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

AMH

0.64

Residential REITs Industry

Max: 1.28
Q3: 0.64
Median: 0.21
Q1: 0.12
Min: 0.00

AMH’s Current Ratio of 0.64 aligns with the median group of the Residential REITs industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

ARE

0.40

Office REITs Industry

Max: 1.49
Q3: 1.22
Median: 0.67
Q1: 0.44
Min: 0.14

ARE’s Current Ratio of 0.40 falls into the lower quartile for the Office REITs industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

AMH vs. ARE: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Residential REITs and Office REITs industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

AMH

0.72

Residential REITs Industry

Max: 1.62
Q3: 1.10
Median: 0.83
Q1: 0.69
Min: 0.28

AMH’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.72 is typical for the Residential REITs industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

ARE

0.77

Office REITs Industry

Max: 1.62
Q3: 1.32
Median: 0.87
Q1: 0.73
Min: 0.42

ARE’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.77 is typical for the Office REITs industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

AMH vs. ARE: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Residential REITs and Office REITs industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

AMH

2.53

Residential REITs Industry

Max: 5.11
Q3: 4.01
Median: 2.53
Q1: 1.52
Min: 0.52

AMH’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.53 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Residential REITs industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

ARE

2.75

Office REITs Industry

Max: 3.98
Q3: 3.37
Median: 1.66
Q1: 1.16
Min: 0.14

ARE’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.75 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Office REITs industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

AMH vs. ARE: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Residential REITs and Office REITs industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	AMH	ARE
Current Ratio (MRQ)	0.64	0.40
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	0.64	0.40
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	0.72	0.77
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	2.53	2.75

Growth

Revenue Growth

AMH vs. ARE: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

AMH vs. ARE: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

AMH

3.31%

Residential REITs Industry

Max: 4.21%
Q3: 3.83%
Median: 3.40%
Q1: 3.27%
Min: 2.80%

AMH’s Dividend Yield of 3.31% is consistent with its peers in the Residential REITs industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

ARE

6.74%

Office REITs Industry

Max: 6.88%
Q3: 5.94%
Median: 4.58%
Q1: 3.82%
Min: 1.22%

With a Dividend Yield of 6.74%, ARE offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Office REITs industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

AMH vs. ARE: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Residential REITs and Office REITs industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

AMH

100.80%

Residential REITs Industry

Max: 210.87%
Q3: 145.45%
Median: 102.94%
Q1: 84.58%
Min: 17.15%

AMH’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 100.80% is within the typical range for the Residential REITs industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

ARE

174.29%

Office REITs Industry

Max: 231.12%
Q3: 180.65%
Median: 94.76%
Q1: 87.60%
Min: 1.02%

ARE’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 174.29% is within the typical range for the Office REITs industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

AMH vs. ARE: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Residential REITs and Office REITs industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	AMH	ARE
Dividend Yield (TTM)	3.31%	6.74%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	100.80%	174.29%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

AMH

30.42

Residential REITs Industry

Max: 177.01
Q3: 109.22
Median: 31.26
Q1: 25.84
Min: 8.46

The P/E Ratio is often not the primary metric for valuation in the Residential REITs industry.

ARE

Office REITs Industry

Max: 48.29
Q3: 44.14
Median: 23.60
Q1: 18.77
Min: 6.08

The P/E Ratio is often not the primary metric for valuation in the Office REITs industry.

AMH vs. ARE: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Residential REITs and Office REITs industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

AMH

7.21

Residential REITs Industry

Max: 12.50
Q3: 10.33
Median: 8.01
Q1: 6.55
Min: 5.06

AMH’s P/S Ratio of 7.21 aligns with the market consensus for the Residential REITs industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

ARE

4.21

Office REITs Industry

Max: 14.09
Q3: 9.33
Median: 6.96
Q1: 4.25
Min: 2.65

In the lower quartile for the Office REITs industry, ARE’s P/S Ratio of 4.21 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

AMH vs. ARE: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Residential REITs and Office REITs industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

AMH

1.86

Residential REITs Industry

Max: 4.49
Q3: 2.83
Median: 2.20
Q1: 1.42
Min: 0.67

AMH’s P/B Ratio of 1.86 is within the conventional range for the Residential REITs industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

ARE

0.73

Office REITs Industry

Max: 2.06
Q3: 1.34
Median: 1.02
Q1: 0.68
Min: 0.57

ARE’s P/B Ratio of 0.73 is within the conventional range for the Office REITs industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

AMH vs. ARE: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Residential REITs and Office REITs industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	AMH	ARE
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	30.42	--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	7.21	4.21
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	1.86	0.73
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	3,495.27	539.86