AMGN vs. GH: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AMGN and GH, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
AMGN dominates in value with a market cap of 145.90 billion USD, eclipsing GH’s 4.60 billion USD by roughly 31.75×.
GH carries a higher beta at 1.49, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while AMGN remains steadier at 0.50.
| Symbol | AMGN | GH |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Amgen Inc. | Guardant Health, Inc. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Healthcare | Healthcare |
| Industry | Drug Manufacturers - General | Medical - Diagnostics & Research |
| CEO | Mr. Robert A. Bradway | Dr. Helmy Eltoukhy Ph.D. |
| Price | 271.34 USD | 37.09 USD |
| Market Cap | 145.90 billion USD | 4.60 billion USD |
| Beta | 0.50 | 1.49 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NASDAQ |
| IPO Date | June 17, 1983 | October 4, 2018 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AMGN and GH over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of AMGN and GH based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- GH shows a negative P/E of -11.03, highlighting a year of losses, whereas AMGN at 24.60 trades on solid profitability.
- GH carries a sub-zero price-to-book ratio of -18.32, indicating negative equity. In contrast, AMGN (P/B 23.52) has positive book value.
- GH reports a negative Price-to-Free Cash Flow ratio of -15.07, showing a cash flow shortfall that could threaten its operational sustainability, while AMGN at 13.37 maintains positive cash flow.
| Symbol | AMGN | GH |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 24.60 | -11.03 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 7.08 | 0.46 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 4.28 | 5.94 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 23.52 | -18.32 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 13.37 | -15.07 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 15.71 | -13.08 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 5.70 | 6.72 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 17.82 | -17.07 |
Dividend Comparison
AMGN delivers a 3.41% dividend yield, blending income with growth, whereas GH appears to retain its profits, possibly to fund operations, R&D, or other growth initiatives.
| Symbol | AMGN | GH |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 3.41% | 0.00% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of AMGN and GH, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- AMGN carries high leverage (debt-to-equity ratio 9.24), whereas GH has negative equity (-5.21), each presenting distinct capital-structure concerns.
- GH carries a debt-to-assets ratio of 0.97, suggesting substantial asset funding via debt, while AMGN at 0.64 opts for a more conservative financing structure.
- AMGN meets its interest obligations (ratio 3.19). In stark contrast, GH’s negative ratio (-166.83) means its operating earnings (EBIT) don't cover basic operations, let alone interest, signaling serious financial trouble.
| Symbol | AMGN | GH |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 1.17 | 4.11 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.88 | 3.76 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 9.24 | -5.21 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.64 | 0.97 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 3.19 | -166.83 |