AMGN vs. BDX: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AMGN and BDX, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
AMGN dominates in value with a market cap of 145.90 billion USD, eclipsing BDX’s 49.62 billion USD by roughly 2.94×.
With betas of 0.50 for AMGN and 0.34 for BDX, both show similar volatility profiles relative to the overall market.
Symbol | AMGN | BDX |
---|---|---|
Company Name | Amgen Inc. | Becton, Dickinson and Company |
Country | US | US |
Sector | Healthcare | Healthcare |
Industry | Drug Manufacturers - General | Medical - Instruments & Supplies |
CEO | Mr. Robert A. Bradway | Mr. Thomas E. Polen Jr. |
Price | 271.34 USD | 173.14 USD |
Market Cap | 145.90 billion USD | 49.62 billion USD |
Beta | 0.50 | 0.34 |
Exchange | NASDAQ | NYSE |
IPO Date | June 17, 1983 | February 21, 1973 |
ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AMGN and BDX over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
For a detailed comparison of valuation metrics between AMGN and BDX, please refer to the table below.
Symbol | AMGN | BDX |
---|---|---|
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 24.60 | 33.33 |
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 7.08 | 5.92 |
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 4.28 | 2.38 |
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 23.52 | 1.98 |
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 13.37 | 19.16 |
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 15.71 | 19.40 |
EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 5.70 | 3.27 |
EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 17.82 | 26.34 |
Dividend Comparison
Both AMGN and BDX offer similar dividend yields (3.41% vs. 2.30%), indicating comparable approaches to balancing income and growth.
Symbol | AMGN | BDX |
---|---|---|
Dividend Yield (TTM) | 3.41% | 2.30% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of AMGN and BDX, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- BDX posts a quick ratio of 0.64, indicating limited coverage of short-term debts from its most liquid assets—while AMGN at 0.88 enjoys stronger liquidity resilience.
- AMGN is heavily leveraged (debt-to-equity ratio 9.24), which can boost returns but raises risk if borrowing costs climb, while BDX at 0.76 keeps leverage at a more moderate level.
Symbol | AMGN | BDX |
---|---|---|
Current Ratio (TTM) | 1.17 | 1.13 |
Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.88 | 0.64 |
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 9.24 | 0.76 |
Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.64 | 0.35 |
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 3.19 | 3.95 |