Seek Returns logo

AMGN vs. AZN: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated

Here’s a clear look at AMGN and AZN, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.

Company Overview

AZN stands out with 432.07 billion USD in market value—about 2.96× AMGN’s market cap of 145.90 billion USD.

AMGN’s beta of 0.50 points to much larger expected swings compared to AZN’s calmer 0.18, suggesting both higher upside and downside potential.

AZN is an ADR, letting U.S. buyers tap its non-U.S. business directly, unlike AMGN, which is purely domestic.

SymbolAMGNAZN
Company NameAmgen Inc.AstraZeneca PLC
CountryUSGB
SectorHealthcareHealthcare
IndustryDrug Manufacturers - GeneralDrug Manufacturers - General
CEOMr. Robert A. BradwayMr. Pascal Claude Roland Soriot D.V.M., M.B.A.
Price271.34 USD69.68 USD
Market Cap145.90 billion USD432.07 billion USD
Beta0.500.18
ExchangeNASDAQNASDAQ
IPO DateJune 17, 1983May 12, 1993
ADRNoYes

Performance Comparison

This chart compares the performance of AMGN and AZN over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).

Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

Valuation Metrics Comparison

For a detailed comparison of valuation metrics between AMGN and AZN, please refer to the table below.

SymbolAMGNAZN
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)24.6027.80
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)7.082.50
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)4.283.93
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)23.525.26
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)13.3722.33
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)15.7113.68
EV-to-Sales (TTM)5.704.41
EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM)17.8225.07

Dividend Comparison

AMGN’s dividend yield of 3.41% is about 146% higher than AZN’s 1.39%, underscoring its stronger focus on returning cash to shareholders.

SymbolAMGNAZN
Dividend Yield (TTM)3.41%1.39%

Financial Strength Metrics Comparison

This section dives into the financial resilience of AMGN and AZN, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.

  • AZN’s current ratio of 0.90 indicates its assets may not cover near-term debts, whereas AMGN at 1.17 maintains healthy liquidity.
  • AZN posts a quick ratio of 0.70, indicating limited coverage of short-term debts from its most liquid assets—while AMGN at 0.88 enjoys stronger liquidity resilience.
  • AMGN is heavily leveraged (debt-to-equity ratio 9.24), which can boost returns but raises risk if borrowing costs climb, while AZN at 0.77 keeps leverage at a more moderate level.
SymbolAMGNAZN
Current Ratio (TTM)1.170.90
Quick Ratio (TTM)0.880.70
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)9.240.77
Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM)0.640.30
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)3.197.95