Seek Returns logo

AMG vs. KKR: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AMG and KKR, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

KKR’s market capitalization of 123.44 billion USD is significantly greater than AMG’s 5.73 billion USD, highlighting its more substantial market valuation.

KKR carries a higher beta at 1.88, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while AMG (beta: 1.08) exhibits greater stability.

SymbolAMGKKR
Company NameAffiliated Managers Group, Inc.KKR & Co. Inc.
CountryUSUS
SectorFinancial ServicesFinancial Services
IndustryAsset ManagementAsset Management
CEOJay C. HorgenJoseph Y. Bae
Price201.45 USD138.6 USD
Market Cap5.73 billion USD123.44 billion USD
Beta1.081.88
ExchangeNYSENYSE
IPO DateNovember 21, 1997July 15, 2010
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AMG and KKR by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AMG vs. KKR: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

AMG

13.17%

Asset Management Industry

Max
34.25%
Q3
18.22%
Median
11.24%
Q1
5.81%
Min
-5.72%

AMG’s Return on Equity of 13.17% is on par with the norm for the Asset Management industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

KKR

9.12%

Asset Management Industry

Max
34.25%
Q3
18.22%
Median
11.24%
Q1
5.81%
Min
-5.72%

KKR’s Return on Equity of 9.12% is on par with the norm for the Asset Management industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

AMG vs. KKR: A comparison of their ROE against the Asset Management industry benchmark.

Return on Invested Capital

AMG

9.52%

Asset Management Industry

Max
42.18%
Q3
20.06%
Median
8.68%
Q1
3.13%
Min
-16.42%

AMG’s Return on Invested Capital of 9.52% is in line with the norm for the Asset Management industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

KKR

-0.03%

Asset Management Industry

Max
42.18%
Q3
20.06%
Median
8.68%
Q1
3.13%
Min
-16.42%

KKR has a negative Return on Invested Capital of -0.03%. This indicates that its operations are failing to generate a profit on the total capital invested, signaling significant inefficiency or value destruction.

AMG vs. KKR: A comparison of their ROIC against the Asset Management industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin

AMG

21.34%

Asset Management Industry

Max
91.66%
Q3
57.81%
Median
29.48%
Q1
15.70%
Min
-27.65%

AMG’s Net Profit Margin of 21.34% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Asset Management industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

KKR

14.63%

Asset Management Industry

Max
91.66%
Q3
57.81%
Median
29.48%
Q1
15.70%
Min
-27.65%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Asset Management industry, KKR’s Net Profit Margin of 14.63% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

AMG vs. KKR: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against the Asset Management industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin

AMG

31.71%

Asset Management Industry

Max
99.76%
Q3
78.28%
Median
34.76%
Q1
21.75%
Min
-48.25%

AMG’s Operating Profit Margin of 31.71% is around the midpoint for the Asset Management industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

KKR

-0.81%

Asset Management Industry

Max
99.76%
Q3
78.28%
Median
34.76%
Q1
21.75%
Min
-48.25%

KKR has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -0.81%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

AMG vs. KKR: A comparison of their Operating Margin against the Asset Management industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAMGKKR
Return on Equity (TTM)13.17%9.12%
Return on Assets (TTM)4.98%0.59%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)9.52%-0.03%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)21.34%14.63%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)31.71%-0.81%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)55.67%18.09%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

AMG

2.10

Asset Management Industry

Max
12.44
Q3
5.76
Median
3.04
Q1
1.03
Min
0.01

AMG’s Current Ratio of 2.10 aligns with the median group of the Asset Management industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

KKR

4.11

Asset Management Industry

Max
12.44
Q3
5.76
Median
3.04
Q1
1.03
Min
0.01

KKR’s Current Ratio of 4.11 aligns with the median group of the Asset Management industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

AMG vs. KKR: A comparison of their Current Ratio against the Asset Management industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

AMG

0.82

Asset Management Industry

Max
2.62
Q3
1.42
Median
0.76
Q1
0.34
Min
0.01

AMG’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.82 is typical for the Asset Management industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

KKR

1.85

Asset Management Industry

Max
2.62
Q3
1.42
Median
0.76
Q1
0.34
Min
0.01

KKR’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Asset Management industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.85. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

AMG vs. KKR: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against the Asset Management industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio

AMG

4.69

Asset Management Industry

Max
13.30
Q3
6.30
Median
2.71
Q1
1.00
Min
-6.91

AMG’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 4.69 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Asset Management industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

KKR

-0.04

Asset Management Industry

Max
13.30
Q3
6.30
Median
2.71
Q1
1.00
Min
-6.91

KKR has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -0.04. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

AMG vs. KKR: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against the Asset Management industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAMGKKR
Current Ratio (TTM)2.104.11
Quick Ratio (TTM)2.104.11
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.821.85
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.300.14
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)1.743.86
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)4.69-0.04

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for AMG and KKR. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

AMG vs. KKR: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

AMG vs. KKR: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

AMG vs. KKR: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

AMG

0.02%

Asset Management Industry

Max
26.09%
Q3
11.60%
Median
6.37%
Q1
2.75%
Min
0.00%

AMG’s Dividend Yield of 0.02% is in the lower quartile for the Asset Management industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

KKR

0.51%

Asset Management Industry

Max
26.09%
Q3
11.60%
Median
6.37%
Q1
2.75%
Min
0.00%

KKR’s Dividend Yield of 0.51% is in the lower quartile for the Asset Management industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

AMG vs. KKR: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against the Asset Management industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio

AMG

0.32%

Asset Management Industry

Max
1,034.88%
Q3
127.70%
Median
75.15%
Q1
34.21%
Min
0.00%

AMG’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 0.32% is in the lower quartile for the Asset Management industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

KKR

28.15%

Asset Management Industry

Max
1,034.88%
Q3
127.70%
Median
75.15%
Q1
34.21%
Min
0.00%

KKR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 28.15% is in the lower quartile for the Asset Management industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

AMG vs. KKR: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against the Asset Management industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAMGKKR
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.02%0.51%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.32%28.15%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

AMG

13.55

Asset Management Industry

Max
38.72
Q3
23.40
Median
11.45
Q1
8.80
Min
1.54

AMG’s P/E Ratio of 13.55 is within the middle range for the Asset Management industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

KKR

55.75

Asset Management Industry

Max
38.72
Q3
23.40
Median
11.45
Q1
8.80
Min
1.54

At 55.75, KKR’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Asset Management industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

AMG vs. KKR: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against the Asset Management industry benchmark.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

AMG

0.92

Asset Management Industry

Max
6.38
Q3
3.23
Median
1.55
Q1
0.89
Min
0.02

AMG’s Forward PEG Ratio of 0.92 is within the middle range of its peers in the Asset Management industry. This suggests a reasonable balance between the stock’s price and its expected growth, aligning with sector valuation norms.

KKR

2.28

Asset Management Industry

Max
6.38
Q3
3.23
Median
1.55
Q1
0.89
Min
0.02

KKR’s Forward PEG Ratio of 2.28 is within the middle range of its peers in the Asset Management industry. This suggests a reasonable balance between the stock’s price and its expected growth, aligning with sector valuation norms.

AMG vs. KKR: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against the Asset Management industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

AMG

2.82

Asset Management Industry

Max
13.75
Q3
7.92
Median
4.87
Q1
3.51
Min
0.02

In the lower quartile for the Asset Management industry, AMG’s P/S Ratio of 2.82 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

KKR

8.18

Asset Management Industry

Max
13.75
Q3
7.92
Median
4.87
Q1
3.51
Min
0.02

KKR’s P/S Ratio of 8.18 is in the upper echelon for the Asset Management industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

AMG vs. KKR: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against the Asset Management industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio

AMG

1.85

Asset Management Industry

Max
5.33
Q3
2.75
Median
1.06
Q1
0.87
Min
0.00

The P/B Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric for the Asset Management industry.

KKR

4.48

Asset Management Industry

Max
5.33
Q3
2.75
Median
1.06
Q1
0.87
Min
0.00

The P/B Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric for the Asset Management industry.

AMG vs. KKR: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against the Asset Management industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAMGKKR
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)13.5555.75
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)0.922.28
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)2.828.18
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)1.854.48
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)7.9716.40
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)7.2618.40
EV-to-Sales (TTM)3.7010.35