Seek Returns logo

AME vs. XYL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AME and XYL, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolAMEXYL
Company NameAMETEK, Inc.Xylem Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryElectrical EquipmentMachinery
Market Capitalization45.08 billion USD34.64 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJuly 19, 1984October 13, 2011
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AME and XYL by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AME vs. XYL: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolAMEXYL
5-Day Price Return-2.35%-5.51%
13-Week Price Return6.62%1.36%
26-Week Price Return7.12%12.45%
52-Week Price Return-1.05%15.36%
Month-to-Date Return-4.33%-5.38%
Year-to-Date Return7.27%23.02%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.33M1.21M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.30M1.17M
3-Month Volatility22.48%16.92%
Beta1.061.18

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

AME

14.49%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
35.25%
Q3
23.48%
Median
11.69%
Q1
6.40%
Min
-4.39%

AME’s Return on Equity of 14.49% is on par with the norm for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

XYL

8.67%

Machinery Industry

Max
30.85%
Q3
19.99%
Median
12.37%
Q1
8.44%
Min
-7.69%

XYL’s Return on Equity of 8.67% is on par with the norm for the Machinery industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

AME vs. XYL: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

AME

20.50%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
20.74%
Q3
10.52%
Median
6.30%
Q1
3.04%
Min
-0.75%

A Net Profit Margin of 20.50% places AME in the upper quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

XYL

10.66%

Machinery Industry

Max
19.28%
Q3
10.99%
Median
7.89%
Q1
5.16%
Min
-1.46%

XYL’s Net Profit Margin of 10.66% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Machinery industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

AME vs. XYL: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

AME

26.16%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
26.16%
Q3
14.51%
Median
8.86%
Q1
4.72%
Min
-5.64%

An Operating Profit Margin of 26.16% places AME in the upper quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

XYL

11.81%

Machinery Industry

Max
27.20%
Q3
15.91%
Median
11.33%
Q1
7.73%
Min
0.23%

XYL’s Operating Profit Margin of 11.81% is around the midpoint for the Machinery industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

AME vs. XYL: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAMEXYL
Return on Equity (TTM)14.49%8.67%
Return on Assets (TTM)9.64%5.61%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)20.50%10.66%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)26.16%11.81%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)36.18%38.23%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

AME

1.16

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
3.09
Q3
2.05
Median
1.44
Q1
1.14
Min
0.85

AME’s Current Ratio of 1.16 aligns with the median group of the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

XYL

1.96

Machinery Industry

Max
3.27
Q3
2.16
Median
1.75
Q1
1.32
Min
0.70

XYL’s Current Ratio of 1.96 aligns with the median group of the Machinery industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

AME vs. XYL: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

AME

0.23

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
1.57
Q3
0.91
Median
0.55
Q1
0.32
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry, AME’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.23 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

XYL

0.18

Machinery Industry

Max
1.49
Q3
0.75
Median
0.45
Q1
0.23
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Machinery industry, XYL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.18 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

AME vs. XYL: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

AME

15.71

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
47.39
Q3
20.31
Median
9.84
Q1
1.16
Min
-10.92

AME’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 15.71 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

XYL

55.35

Machinery Industry

Max
67.55
Q3
36.46
Median
13.55
Q1
7.73
Min
-1.43

XYL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 55.35 is in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

AME vs. XYL: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAMEXYL
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.161.96
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.721.39
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.230.18
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)15.7155.35

Growth

Revenue Growth

AME vs. XYL: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

AME vs. XYL: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

AME

0.63%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
2.91%
Q3
1.66%
Median
1.09%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AME’s Dividend Yield of 0.63% is consistent with its peers in the Electrical Equipment industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

XYL

1.04%

Machinery Industry

Max
4.98%
Q3
2.83%
Median
1.89%
Q1
1.17%
Min
0.00%

XYL’s Dividend Yield of 1.04% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

AME vs. XYL: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

AME

19.00%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
130.92%
Q3
64.56%
Median
37.60%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AME’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 19.00% is within the typical range for the Electrical Equipment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

XYL

40.08%

Machinery Industry

Max
209.29%
Q3
102.41%
Median
62.34%
Q1
29.36%
Min
0.00%

XYL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 40.08% is within the typical range for the Machinery industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

AME vs. XYL: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAMEXYL
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.63%1.04%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)19.00%40.08%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

AME

30.07

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
51.71
Q3
37.50
Median
23.51
Q1
19.68
Min
8.22

AME’s P/E Ratio of 30.07 is within the middle range for the Electrical Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

XYL

38.61

Machinery Industry

Max
46.28
Q3
29.52
Median
24.18
Q1
16.92
Min
7.99

A P/E Ratio of 38.61 places XYL in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

AME vs. XYL: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

AME

6.17

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
7.22
Q3
4.00
Median
1.70
Q1
1.04
Min
0.43

AME’s P/S Ratio of 6.17 is in the upper echelon for the Electrical Equipment industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

XYL

4.12

Machinery Industry

Max
5.25
Q3
2.82
Median
1.74
Q1
0.99
Min
0.27

XYL’s P/S Ratio of 4.12 is in the upper echelon for the Machinery industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

AME vs. XYL: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

AME

4.12

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
10.81
Q3
5.42
Median
3.69
Q1
1.77
Min
0.78

AME’s P/B Ratio of 4.12 is within the conventional range for the Electrical Equipment industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

XYL

3.20

Machinery Industry

Max
7.18
Q3
4.18
Median
2.71
Q1
1.54
Min
0.52

XYL’s P/B Ratio of 3.20 is within the conventional range for the Machinery industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

AME vs. XYL: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAMEXYL
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)30.0738.61
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)6.174.12
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)4.123.20
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)26.8940.49