Seek Returns logo

AME vs. VRT: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AME and VRT, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

AME’s market capitalization stands at 42.53 billion USD, while VRT’s is 48.72 billion USD, indicating their market valuations are broadly comparable.

VRT carries a higher beta at 1.73, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while AME (beta: 1.11) exhibits greater stability.

SymbolAMEVRT
Company NameAMETEK, Inc.Vertiv Holdings Co
CountryUSUS
SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
IndustryIndustrial - MachineryElectrical Equipment & Parts
CEODavid A. ZapicoGiordano Albertazzi
Price184.19 USD127.84 USD
Market Cap42.53 billion USD48.72 billion USD
Beta1.111.73
ExchangeNYSENYSE
IPO DateJuly 19, 1984August 2, 2018
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AME and VRT by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AME vs. VRT: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

AME

14.75%

Industrial - Machinery Industry

Max
36.51%
Q3
18.65%
Median
12.08%
Q1
4.75%
Min
-15.57%

AME’s Return on Equity of 14.75% is on par with the norm for the Industrial - Machinery industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

VRT

31.53%

Electrical Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
40.77%
Q3
24.97%
Median
9.16%
Q1
-21.24%
Min
-83.49%

In the upper quartile for the Electrical Equipment & Parts industry, VRT’s Return on Equity of 31.53% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

AME vs. VRT: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Industrial - Machinery and Electrical Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

AME

11.22%

Industrial - Machinery Industry

Max
22.35%
Q3
12.64%
Median
9.33%
Q1
5.32%
Min
-5.42%

AME’s Return on Invested Capital of 11.22% is in line with the norm for the Industrial - Machinery industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

VRT

14.66%

Electrical Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
28.65%
Q3
9.59%
Median
4.18%
Q1
-26.21%
Min
-64.66%

In the upper quartile for the Electrical Equipment & Parts industry, VRT’s Return on Invested Capital of 14.66% signifies a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.

AME vs. VRT: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Industrial - Machinery and Electrical Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

AME

20.43%

Industrial - Machinery Industry

Max
28.85%
Q3
15.25%
Median
10.02%
Q1
5.33%
Min
-8.75%

A Net Profit Margin of 20.43% places AME in the upper quartile for the Industrial - Machinery industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

VRT

7.92%

Electrical Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
18.22%
Q3
10.17%
Median
3.30%
Q1
-100.73%
Min
-135.80%

VRT’s Net Profit Margin of 7.92% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Electrical Equipment & Parts industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

AME vs. VRT: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Industrial - Machinery and Electrical Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

AME

26.20%

Industrial - Machinery Industry

Max
28.19%
Q3
19.04%
Median
14.62%
Q1
8.13%
Min
-5.76%

An Operating Profit Margin of 26.20% places AME in the upper quartile for the Industrial - Machinery industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

VRT

17.31%

Electrical Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
19.88%
Q3
14.79%
Median
7.23%
Q1
-48.45%
Min
-140.29%

An Operating Profit Margin of 17.31% places VRT in the upper quartile for the Electrical Equipment & Parts industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

AME vs. VRT: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Industrial - Machinery and Electrical Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAMEVRT
Return on Equity (TTM)14.75%31.53%
Return on Assets (TTM)9.52%7.05%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)11.22%14.66%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)20.43%7.92%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)26.20%17.31%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)36.18%36.32%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

AME

1.41

Industrial - Machinery Industry

Max
4.18
Q3
2.75
Median
2.07
Q1
1.46
Min
0.46

AME’s Current Ratio of 1.41 falls into the lower quartile for the Industrial - Machinery industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

VRT

1.72

Electrical Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
4.74
Q3
3.44
Median
2.63
Q1
1.95
Min
1.17

VRT’s Current Ratio of 1.72 falls into the lower quartile for the Electrical Equipment & Parts industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

AME vs. VRT: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Industrial - Machinery and Electrical Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

AME

0.19

Industrial - Machinery Industry

Max
1.46
Q3
0.73
Median
0.48
Q1
0.17
Min
0.00

AME’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.19 is typical for the Industrial - Machinery industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

VRT

1.18

Electrical Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
0.82
Q3
0.68
Median
0.61
Q1
0.47
Min
0.33

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.18, VRT operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Electrical Equipment & Parts industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

AME vs. VRT: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Industrial - Machinery and Electrical Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

AME

23.38

Industrial - Machinery Industry

Max
28.91
Q3
14.99
Median
9.11
Q1
3.95
Min
-11.30

AME’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 23.38 is in the upper quartile for the Industrial - Machinery industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

VRT

10.65

Electrical Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
21.00
Q3
9.09
Median
3.12
Q1
-7.14
Min
-31.43

VRT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 10.65 is in the upper quartile for the Electrical Equipment & Parts industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

AME vs. VRT: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Industrial - Machinery and Electrical Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAMEVRT
Current Ratio (TTM)1.411.72
Quick Ratio (TTM)0.861.28
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.191.18
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.130.33
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)0.731.15
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)23.3810.65

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for AME and VRT. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

AME vs. VRT: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

AME vs. VRT: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

AME vs. VRT: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

AME

0.64%

Industrial - Machinery Industry

Max
4.40%
Q3
1.47%
Median
0.74%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AME’s Dividend Yield of 0.64% is consistent with its peers in the Industrial - Machinery industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

VRT

0.11%

Electrical Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
1.81%
Q3
0.50%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

VRT’s Dividend Yield of 0.11% is consistent with its peers in the Electrical Equipment & Parts industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

AME vs. VRT: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Industrial - Machinery and Electrical Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

AME

18.74%

Industrial - Machinery Industry

Max
78.48%
Q3
36.22%
Median
20.24%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AME’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 18.74% is within the typical range for the Industrial - Machinery industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

VRT

7.07%

Electrical Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
162.68%
Q3
20.84%
Median
4.65%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

VRT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 7.07% is within the typical range for the Electrical Equipment & Parts industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

AME vs. VRT: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Industrial - Machinery and Electrical Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAMEVRT
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.64%0.11%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)18.74%7.07%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

AME

29.98

Industrial - Machinery Industry

Max
47.62
Q3
34.41
Median
27.36
Q1
21.62
Min
10.96

AME’s P/E Ratio of 29.98 is within the middle range for the Industrial - Machinery industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

VRT

73.08

Electrical Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
27.52
Q3
27.52
Median
24.22
Q1
20.08
Min
9.48

At 73.08, VRT’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Electrical Equipment & Parts industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

AME vs. VRT: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Industrial - Machinery and Electrical Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

AME

4.01

Industrial - Machinery Industry

Max
6.15
Q3
3.53
Median
2.82
Q1
1.71
Min
0.09

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Industrial - Machinery industry.

VRT

4.20

Electrical Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
5.30
Q3
4.04
Median
2.62
Q1
2.03
Min
0.01

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Electrical Equipment & Parts industry.

AME vs. VRT: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Industrial - Machinery and Electrical Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

AME

6.13

Industrial - Machinery Industry

Max
8.37
Q3
4.59
Median
3.34
Q1
1.83
Min
0.32

AME’s P/S Ratio of 6.13 is in the upper echelon for the Industrial - Machinery industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

VRT

5.79

Electrical Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
5.76
Q3
5.66
Median
3.18
Q1
1.88
Min
0.31

With a P/S Ratio of 5.79, VRT trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Electrical Equipment & Parts industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

AME vs. VRT: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Industrial - Machinery and Electrical Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

AME

4.26

Industrial - Machinery Industry

Max
7.49
Q3
5.01
Median
3.41
Q1
2.45
Min
0.01

AME’s P/B Ratio of 4.26 is within the conventional range for the Industrial - Machinery industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

VRT

18.26

Electrical Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
10.91
Q3
6.77
Median
3.73
Q1
1.80
Min
0.59

At 18.26, VRT’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Electrical Equipment & Parts industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

AME vs. VRT: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Industrial - Machinery and Electrical Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAMEVRT
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)29.9873.08
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)4.014.20
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)6.135.79
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)4.2618.26
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)24.8237.37
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)21.0034.51
EV-to-Sales (TTM)6.355.99