Seek Returns logo

AME vs. UPS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AME and UPS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolAMEUPS
Company NameAMETEK, Inc.United Parcel Service, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryElectrical EquipmentAir Freight & Logistics
Market Capitalization42.34 billion USD73.69 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJuly 19, 1984November 10, 1999
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AME and UPS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AME vs. UPS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolAMEUPS
5-Day Price Return-0.91%-1.82%
13-Week Price Return1.34%-12.28%
26-Week Price Return-0.16%-24.82%
52-Week Price Return13.84%-32.58%
Month-to-Date Return0.19%0.91%
Year-to-Date Return2.74%-31.05%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.13M8.79M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.34M6.38M
3-Month Volatility17.75%31.06%
Beta1.131.10

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

AME

14.53%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
37.56%
Q3
20.60%
Median
14.38%
Q1
4.35%
Min
0.90%

AME’s Return on Equity of 14.53% is on par with the norm for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

UPS

35.27%

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
35.27%
Q3
18.47%
Median
11.35%
Q1
7.21%
Min
2.53%

In the upper quartile for the Air Freight & Logistics industry, UPS’s Return on Equity of 35.27% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

AME vs. UPS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

AME

20.60%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
20.43%
Q3
10.97%
Median
6.07%
Q1
3.16%
Min
0.29%

AME’s Net Profit Margin of 20.60% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Electrical Equipment industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

UPS

6.34%

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
10.27%
Q3
6.18%
Median
3.96%
Q1
2.32%
Min
0.61%

A Net Profit Margin of 6.34% places UPS in the upper quartile for the Air Freight & Logistics industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

AME vs. UPS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

AME

26.24%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
26.20%
Q3
14.31%
Median
7.54%
Q1
3.77%
Min
-5.64%

AME’s Operating Profit Margin of 26.24% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Electrical Equipment industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

UPS

9.30%

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
17.40%
Q3
8.87%
Median
5.89%
Q1
3.03%
Min
0.62%

An Operating Profit Margin of 9.30% places UPS in the upper quartile for the Air Freight & Logistics industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

AME vs. UPS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAMEUPS
Return on Equity (TTM)14.53%35.27%
Return on Assets (TTM)9.66%8.25%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)20.60%6.34%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)26.24%9.30%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)36.12%81.60%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

AME

1.63

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
3.02
Q3
1.99
Median
1.41
Q1
1.07
Min
0.80

AME’s Current Ratio of 1.63 aligns with the median group of the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

UPS

1.32

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
1.83
Q3
1.47
Median
1.29
Q1
1.05
Min
0.62

UPS’s Current Ratio of 1.32 aligns with the median group of the Air Freight & Logistics industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

AME vs. UPS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

AME

0.19

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
1.44
Q3
0.99
Median
0.56
Q1
0.24
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry, AME’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.19 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

UPS

1.57

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
1.57
Q3
1.06
Median
0.72
Q1
0.30
Min
0.00

UPS’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Air Freight & Logistics industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.57. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

AME vs. UPS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

AME

15.71

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
36.12
Q3
19.29
Median
9.38
Q1
1.16
Min
-10.92

AME’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 15.71 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

UPS

9.59

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
49.07
Q3
23.59
Median
8.56
Q1
5.97
Min
-0.60

UPS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 9.59 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Air Freight & Logistics industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

AME vs. UPS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAMEUPS
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.631.32
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.041.32
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.191.57
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)15.719.59

Growth

Revenue Growth

AME vs. UPS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

AME vs. UPS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

AME

0.64%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
2.20%
Q3
1.53%
Median
1.01%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AME’s Dividend Yield of 0.64% is consistent with its peers in the Electrical Equipment industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

UPS

7.29%

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
6.43%
Q3
3.10%
Median
2.40%
Q1
0.46%
Min
0.00%

UPS’s Dividend Yield of 7.29% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Air Freight & Logistics industry. While this may seem attractive, an unusually high yield can sometimes be a warning sign, reflecting a falling stock price or market concerns about the dividend’s sustainability.

AME vs. UPS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

AME

18.94%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
119.44%
Q3
51.87%
Median
27.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AME’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 18.94% is within the typical range for the Electrical Equipment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

UPS

94.15%

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
160.95%
Q3
92.80%
Median
54.10%
Q1
0.19%
Min
0.00%

UPS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 94.15% is in the upper quartile for the Air Freight & Logistics industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

AME vs. UPS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAMEUPS
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.64%7.29%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)18.94%94.15%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

AME

29.53

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
81.85
Q3
44.17
Median
27.61
Q1
18.62
Min
7.73

AME’s P/E Ratio of 29.53 is within the middle range for the Electrical Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

UPS

12.92

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
34.55
Q3
23.34
Median
16.33
Q1
13.38
Min
6.36

In the lower quartile for the Air Freight & Logistics industry, UPS’s P/E Ratio of 12.92 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

AME vs. UPS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

AME

6.08

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
8.18
Q3
4.02
Median
1.84
Q1
0.97
Min
0.44

AME’s P/S Ratio of 6.08 is in the upper echelon for the Electrical Equipment industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

UPS

0.82

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
2.13
Q3
1.16
Median
0.59
Q1
0.36
Min
0.18

UPS’s P/S Ratio of 0.82 aligns with the market consensus for the Air Freight & Logistics industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

AME vs. UPS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

AME

4.02

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
8.50
Q3
4.53
Median
3.39
Q1
1.70
Min
0.51

AME’s P/B Ratio of 4.02 is within the conventional range for the Electrical Equipment industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

UPS

5.43

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
3.13
Q3
2.81
Median
1.82
Q1
1.20
Min
0.74

At 5.43, UPS’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Air Freight & Logistics industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

AME vs. UPS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAMEUPS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)29.5312.92
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)6.080.82
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)4.025.43
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)25.2213.77