AME vs. UNP: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AME and UNP, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
UNP stands out with 133.61 billion USD in market value—about 3.26× AME’s market cap of 41.02 billion USD.
With betas of 1.12 for AME and 1.07 for UNP, both show similar volatility profiles relative to the overall market.
| Symbol | AME | UNP |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | AMETEK, Inc. | Union Pacific Corporation |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| Industry | Industrial - Machinery | Railroads |
| CEO | Mr. David A. Zapico | Mr. Vincenzo James Vena |
| Price | 177.68 USD | 223.62 USD |
| Market Cap | 41.02 billion USD | 133.61 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.12 | 1.07 |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| IPO Date | July 19, 1984 | January 2, 1980 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AME and UNP over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
For a detailed comparison of valuation metrics between AME and UNP, please refer to the table below.
| Symbol | AME | UNP |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 28.93 | 19.96 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 3.87 | 1.69 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 5.91 | 5.51 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 4.11 | 8.38 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 23.94 | 19.71 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 20.29 | 14.09 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 6.13 | 6.85 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 24.83 | 24.50 |
Dividend Comparison
UNP stands out with a 2.38% dividend yield—around 268% above AME’s 0.65%—highlighting its emphasis on generous payouts.
| Symbol | AME | UNP |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.65% | 2.38% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of AME and UNP, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- UNP’s current ratio of 0.73 indicates its assets may not cover near-term debts, whereas AME at 1.41 maintains healthy liquidity.
- UNP posts a quick ratio of 0.73, indicating limited coverage of short-term debts from its most liquid assets—while AME at 0.86 enjoys stronger liquidity resilience.
| Symbol | AME | UNP |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 1.41 | 0.73 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.86 | 0.73 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.19 | 2.11 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.13 | 0.50 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 23.38 | 15.57 |