Seek Returns logo

AME vs. UNP: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AME and UNP, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolAMEUNP
Company NameAMETEK, Inc.Union Pacific Corporation
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryElectrical EquipmentGround Transportation
Market Capitalization42.34 billion USD133.84 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJuly 19, 1984January 2, 1980
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AME and UNP by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AME vs. UNP: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolAMEUNP
5-Day Price Return-0.91%1.88%
13-Week Price Return1.34%-1.66%
26-Week Price Return-0.16%-10.08%
52-Week Price Return13.84%-8.29%
Month-to-Date Return0.19%1.67%
Year-to-Date Return2.74%-1.03%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.13M3.88M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.34M3.69M
3-Month Volatility17.75%19.10%
Beta1.131.07

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

AME

14.53%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
37.56%
Q3
20.60%
Median
14.38%
Q1
4.35%
Min
0.90%

AME’s Return on Equity of 14.53% is on par with the norm for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

UNP

42.18%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
22.11%
Q3
13.84%
Median
9.66%
Q1
7.55%
Min
0.36%

UNP’s Return on Equity of 42.18% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Ground Transportation industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

AME vs. UNP: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

AME

20.60%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
20.43%
Q3
10.97%
Median
6.07%
Q1
3.16%
Min
0.29%

AME’s Net Profit Margin of 20.60% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Electrical Equipment industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

UNP

28.43%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
32.20%
Q3
18.59%
Median
7.11%
Q1
4.13%
Min
-10.38%

A Net Profit Margin of 28.43% places UNP in the upper quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

AME vs. UNP: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

AME

26.24%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
26.20%
Q3
14.31%
Median
7.54%
Q1
3.77%
Min
-5.64%

AME’s Operating Profit Margin of 26.24% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Electrical Equipment industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

UNP

40.33%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
41.31%
Q3
23.16%
Median
11.33%
Q1
6.82%
Min
-12.08%

An Operating Profit Margin of 40.33% places UNP in the upper quartile for the Ground Transportation industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

AME vs. UNP: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAMEUNP
Return on Equity (TTM)14.53%42.18%
Return on Assets (TTM)9.66%10.19%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)20.60%28.43%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)26.24%40.33%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)36.12%79.89%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

AME

1.63

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
3.02
Q3
1.99
Median
1.41
Q1
1.07
Min
0.80

AME’s Current Ratio of 1.63 aligns with the median group of the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

UNP

0.65

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.03
Q3
1.26
Median
0.89
Q1
0.73
Min
0.38

UNP’s Current Ratio of 0.65 falls into the lower quartile for the Ground Transportation industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

AME vs. UNP: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

AME

0.19

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
1.44
Q3
0.99
Median
0.56
Q1
0.24
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry, AME’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.19 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

UNP

2.02

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.51
Q3
1.51
Median
1.06
Q1
0.47
Min
0.00

UNP’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Ground Transportation industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.02. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

AME vs. UNP: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

AME

15.71

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
36.12
Q3
19.29
Median
9.38
Q1
1.16
Min
-10.92

AME’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 15.71 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

UNP

8.23

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
51.07
Q3
22.54
Median
7.94
Q1
2.72
Min
-24.57

UNP’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 8.23 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Ground Transportation industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

AME vs. UNP: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAMEUNP
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.630.65
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.040.53
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.192.02
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)15.718.23

Growth

Revenue Growth

AME vs. UNP: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

AME vs. UNP: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

AME

0.64%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
2.20%
Q3
1.53%
Median
1.01%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AME’s Dividend Yield of 0.64% is consistent with its peers in the Electrical Equipment industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

UNP

2.40%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
5.44%
Q3
2.49%
Median
1.53%
Q1
0.39%
Min
0.00%

UNP’s Dividend Yield of 2.40% is consistent with its peers in the Ground Transportation industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

AME vs. UNP: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

AME

18.94%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
119.44%
Q3
51.87%
Median
27.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AME’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 18.94% is within the typical range for the Electrical Equipment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

UNP

46.49%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
137.07%
Q3
74.71%
Median
41.16%
Q1
15.12%
Min
0.00%

UNP’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 46.49% is within the typical range for the Ground Transportation industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

AME vs. UNP: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAMEUNP
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.64%2.40%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)18.94%46.49%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

AME

29.53

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
81.85
Q3
44.17
Median
27.61
Q1
18.62
Min
7.73

AME’s P/E Ratio of 29.53 is within the middle range for the Electrical Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

UNP

19.36

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
42.59
Q3
24.86
Median
16.38
Q1
12.79
Min
4.37

UNP’s P/E Ratio of 19.36 is within the middle range for the Ground Transportation industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

AME vs. UNP: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

AME

6.08

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
8.18
Q3
4.02
Median
1.84
Q1
0.97
Min
0.44

AME’s P/S Ratio of 6.08 is in the upper echelon for the Electrical Equipment industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

UNP

5.51

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
4.02
Q3
2.20
Median
1.23
Q1
0.87
Min
0.22

With a P/S Ratio of 5.51, UNP trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Ground Transportation industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

AME vs. UNP: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

AME

4.02

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
8.50
Q3
4.53
Median
3.39
Q1
1.70
Min
0.51

AME’s P/B Ratio of 4.02 is within the conventional range for the Electrical Equipment industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

UNP

8.46

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
4.95
Q3
2.78
Median
1.38
Q1
1.17
Min
0.64

At 8.46, UNP’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Ground Transportation industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

AME vs. UNP: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAMEUNP
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)29.5319.36
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)6.085.51
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)4.028.46
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)25.2221.45