Seek Returns logo

AME vs. ULS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AME and ULS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolAMEULS
Company NameAMETEK, Inc.UL Solutions Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryElectrical EquipmentProfessional Services
Market Capitalization42.44 billion USD14.51 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJuly 19, 1984April 12, 2024
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AME and ULS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AME vs. ULS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolAMEULS
5-Day Price Return-1.67%2.91%
13-Week Price Return-0.24%2.16%
26-Week Price Return6.74%28.03%
52-Week Price Return9.24%46.68%
Month-to-Date Return-2.26%1.91%
Year-to-Date Return1.94%44.77%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.22M0.64M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.30M0.79M
3-Month Volatility17.69%35.23%
Beta1.050.43

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

AME

14.53%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
35.67%
Q3
23.64%
Median
11.74%
Q1
6.08%
Min
-4.39%

AME’s Return on Equity of 14.53% is on par with the norm for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

ULS

34.07%

Professional Services Industry

Max
68.01%
Q3
35.32%
Median
21.92%
Q1
11.67%
Min
-20.25%

ULS’s Return on Equity of 34.07% is on par with the norm for the Professional Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

AME vs. ULS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

AME

20.60%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
20.60%
Q3
10.26%
Median
5.83%
Q1
2.92%
Min
-0.75%

A Net Profit Margin of 20.60% places AME in the upper quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

ULS

11.08%

Professional Services Industry

Max
31.75%
Q3
15.50%
Median
8.95%
Q1
4.51%
Min
0.35%

ULS’s Net Profit Margin of 11.08% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Professional Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

AME vs. ULS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

AME

26.24%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
26.24%
Q3
14.53%
Median
7.97%
Q1
3.45%
Min
-5.64%

An Operating Profit Margin of 26.24% places AME in the upper quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

ULS

16.71%

Professional Services Industry

Max
30.62%
Q3
19.06%
Median
13.60%
Q1
8.60%
Min
-2.18%

ULS’s Operating Profit Margin of 16.71% is around the midpoint for the Professional Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

AME vs. ULS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAMEULS
Return on Equity (TTM)14.53%34.07%
Return on Assets (TTM)9.66%11.40%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)20.60%11.08%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)26.24%16.71%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)36.12%48.53%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

AME

1.63

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
3.31
Q3
2.09
Median
1.48
Q1
1.09
Min
0.85

AME’s Current Ratio of 1.63 aligns with the median group of the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

ULS

1.32

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.28
Q3
1.75
Median
1.34
Q1
1.10
Min
0.47

ULS’s Current Ratio of 1.32 aligns with the median group of the Professional Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

AME vs. ULS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

AME

0.19

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
1.57
Q3
0.96
Median
0.57
Q1
0.30
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry, AME’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.19 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

ULS

0.56

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.93
Q3
1.45
Median
0.98
Q1
0.45
Min
0.00

ULS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.56 is typical for the Professional Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

AME vs. ULS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

AME

15.71

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
44.15
Q3
19.29
Median
9.38
Q1
0.98
Min
-19.47

AME’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 15.71 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

ULS

11.92

Professional Services Industry

Max
39.45
Q3
20.41
Median
11.64
Q1
5.46
Min
-1.21

ULS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 11.92 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Professional Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

AME vs. ULS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAMEULS
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.631.32
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.041.32
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.190.56
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)15.7111.92

Growth

Revenue Growth

AME vs. ULS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

AME vs. ULS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

AME

0.64%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
3.04%
Q3
1.58%
Median
1.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AME’s Dividend Yield of 0.64% is consistent with its peers in the Electrical Equipment industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

ULS

0.70%

Professional Services Industry

Max
4.83%
Q3
2.44%
Median
1.52%
Q1
0.52%
Min
0.00%

ULS’s Dividend Yield of 0.70% is consistent with its peers in the Professional Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

AME vs. ULS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

AME

18.94%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
165.68%
Q3
71.84%
Median
38.15%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AME’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 18.94% is within the typical range for the Electrical Equipment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

ULS

31.19%

Professional Services Industry

Max
128.51%
Q3
69.03%
Median
47.00%
Q1
18.05%
Min
0.00%

ULS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 31.19% is within the typical range for the Professional Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

AME vs. ULS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAMEULS
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.64%0.70%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)18.94%31.19%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

AME

29.59

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
65.02
Q3
38.99
Median
27.41
Q1
19.88
Min
8.37

AME’s P/E Ratio of 29.59 is within the middle range for the Electrical Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

ULS

44.36

Professional Services Industry

Max
52.60
Q3
33.83
Median
24.95
Q1
17.59
Min
7.96

A P/E Ratio of 44.36 places ULS in the upper quartile for the Professional Services industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

AME vs. ULS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

AME

6.09

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
7.01
Q3
4.03
Median
1.79
Q1
1.10
Min
0.47

AME’s P/S Ratio of 6.09 is in the upper echelon for the Electrical Equipment industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

ULS

4.92

Professional Services Industry

Max
8.27
Q3
4.40
Median
2.09
Q1
0.99
Min
0.17

ULS’s P/S Ratio of 4.92 is in the upper echelon for the Professional Services industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

AME vs. ULS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

AME

4.02

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
10.97
Q3
5.57
Median
3.50
Q1
1.66
Min
0.64

AME’s P/B Ratio of 4.02 is within the conventional range for the Electrical Equipment industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

ULS

13.37

Professional Services Industry

Max
18.75
Q3
9.53
Median
5.88
Q1
2.95
Min
0.59

ULS’s P/B Ratio of 13.37 is in the upper tier for the Professional Services industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

AME vs. ULS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAMEULS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)29.5944.36
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)6.094.92
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)4.0213.37
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)25.2639.85