AME vs. TT: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AME and TT, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
TT stands out with 94.75 billion USD in market value—about 2.31× AME’s market cap of 41.02 billion USD.
With betas of 1.12 for AME and 1.15 for TT, both show similar volatility profiles relative to the overall market.
| Symbol | AME | TT |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | AMETEK, Inc. | Trane Technologies plc |
| Country | US | IE |
| Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| Industry | Industrial - Machinery | Construction |
| CEO | Mr. David A. Zapico | Mr. David S. Regnery |
| Price | 177.68 USD | 424.86 USD |
| Market Cap | 41.02 billion USD | 94.75 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.12 | 1.15 |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| IPO Date | July 19, 1984 | March 17, 1980 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AME and TT over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
For a detailed comparison of valuation metrics between AME and TT, please refer to the table below.
| Symbol | AME | TT |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 28.93 | 45.99 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 3.87 | 4.00 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 5.91 | 6.07 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 4.11 | 12.73 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 23.94 | 33.49 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 20.29 | 24.29 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 6.13 | 6.32 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 24.83 | 34.87 |
Dividend Comparison
Both AME and TT offer similar dividend yields (0.65% vs. 0.81%), indicating comparable approaches to balancing income and growth.
| Symbol | AME | TT |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.65% | 0.81% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of AME and TT, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- TT posts a quick ratio of 0.74, indicating limited coverage of short-term debts from its most liquid assets—while AME at 0.86 enjoys stronger liquidity resilience.
| Symbol | AME | TT |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 1.41 | 1.09 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.86 | 0.74 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.19 | 0.64 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.13 | 0.24 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 23.38 | 20.43 |