Seek Returns logo

AME vs. SAIA: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AME and SAIA, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

AME’s market capitalization of 42.53 billion USD is substantially larger than SAIA’s 7.85 billion USD, indicating a significant difference in their market valuations.

SAIA carries a higher beta at 2.00, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while AME (beta: 1.11) exhibits greater stability.

SymbolAMESAIA
Company NameAMETEK, Inc.Saia, Inc.
CountryUSUS
SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
IndustryIndustrial - MachineryTrucking
CEODavid A. ZapicoFrederick J. Holzgrefe III
Price184.19 USD294.79 USD
Market Cap42.53 billion USD7.85 billion USD
Beta1.112.00
ExchangeNYSENASDAQ
IPO DateJuly 19, 1984September 11, 2002
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AME and SAIA by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AME vs. SAIA: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

AME

14.75%

Industrial - Machinery Industry

Max
36.51%
Q3
18.65%
Median
12.08%
Q1
4.75%
Min
-15.57%

AME’s Return on Equity of 14.75% is on par with the norm for the Industrial - Machinery industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

SAIA

14.21%

Trucking Industry

Max
27.40%
Q3
13.41%
Median
6.54%
Q1
1.91%
Min
-3.46%

In the upper quartile for the Trucking industry, SAIA’s Return on Equity of 14.21% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

AME vs. SAIA: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Industrial - Machinery and Trucking industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

AME

11.22%

Industrial - Machinery Industry

Max
22.35%
Q3
12.64%
Median
9.33%
Q1
5.32%
Min
-5.42%

AME’s Return on Invested Capital of 11.22% is in line with the norm for the Industrial - Machinery industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

SAIA

10.76%

Trucking Industry

Max
10.76%
Q3
8.53%
Median
3.70%
Q1
1.79%
Min
-2.53%

In the upper quartile for the Trucking industry, SAIA’s Return on Invested Capital of 10.76% signifies a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.

AME vs. SAIA: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Industrial - Machinery and Trucking industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

AME

20.43%

Industrial - Machinery Industry

Max
28.85%
Q3
15.25%
Median
10.02%
Q1
5.33%
Min
-8.75%

A Net Profit Margin of 20.43% places AME in the upper quartile for the Industrial - Machinery industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

SAIA

9.91%

Trucking Industry

Max
4.81%
Q3
4.61%
Median
2.88%
Q1
1.68%
Min
0.60%

SAIA’s Net Profit Margin of 9.91% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Trucking industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

AME vs. SAIA: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Industrial - Machinery and Trucking industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

AME

26.20%

Industrial - Machinery Industry

Max
28.19%
Q3
19.04%
Median
14.62%
Q1
8.13%
Min
-5.76%

An Operating Profit Margin of 26.20% places AME in the upper quartile for the Industrial - Machinery industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

SAIA

13.40%

Trucking Industry

Max
13.40%
Q3
8.09%
Median
4.17%
Q1
2.19%
Min
-1.98%

An Operating Profit Margin of 13.40% places SAIA in the upper quartile for the Trucking industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

AME vs. SAIA: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Industrial - Machinery and Trucking industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAMESAIA
Return on Equity (TTM)14.75%14.21%
Return on Assets (TTM)9.52%9.54%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)11.22%10.76%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)20.43%9.91%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)26.20%13.40%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)36.18%18.56%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

AME

1.41

Industrial - Machinery Industry

Max
4.18
Q3
2.75
Median
2.07
Q1
1.46
Min
0.46

AME’s Current Ratio of 1.41 falls into the lower quartile for the Industrial - Machinery industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

SAIA

1.43

Trucking Industry

Max
1.90
Q3
1.45
Median
1.24
Q1
1.03
Min
0.88

SAIA’s Current Ratio of 1.43 aligns with the median group of the Trucking industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

AME vs. SAIA: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Industrial - Machinery and Trucking industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

AME

0.19

Industrial - Machinery Industry

Max
1.46
Q3
0.73
Median
0.48
Q1
0.17
Min
0.00

AME’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.19 is typical for the Industrial - Machinery industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

SAIA

0.18

Trucking Industry

Max
0.63
Q3
0.50
Median
0.34
Q1
0.19
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Trucking industry, SAIA’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.18 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

AME vs. SAIA: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Industrial - Machinery and Trucking industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

AME

23.38

Industrial - Machinery Industry

Max
28.91
Q3
14.99
Median
9.11
Q1
3.95
Min
-11.30

AME’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 23.38 is in the upper quartile for the Industrial - Machinery industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

SAIA

34.28

Trucking Industry

Max
34.42
Q3
21.52
Median
3.73
Q1
1.68
Min
-2.10

SAIA’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 34.28 is in the upper quartile for the Trucking industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

AME vs. SAIA: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Industrial - Machinery and Trucking industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAMESAIA
Current Ratio (TTM)1.411.43
Quick Ratio (TTM)0.861.43
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.190.18
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.130.12
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)0.730.61
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)23.3834.28

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for AME and SAIA. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

AME vs. SAIA: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

AME vs. SAIA: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

AME vs. SAIA: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

AME

0.64%

Industrial - Machinery Industry

Max
4.40%
Q3
1.47%
Median
0.74%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AME’s Dividend Yield of 0.64% is consistent with its peers in the Industrial - Machinery industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

SAIA

0.00%

Trucking Industry

Max
2.03%
Q3
1.69%
Median
1.22%
Q1
0.65%
Min
0.00%

SAIA currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

AME vs. SAIA: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Industrial - Machinery and Trucking industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

AME

18.74%

Industrial - Machinery Industry

Max
78.48%
Q3
36.22%
Median
20.24%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AME’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 18.74% is within the typical range for the Industrial - Machinery industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

SAIA

0.00%

Trucking Industry

Max
195.49%
Q3
55.74%
Median
19.72%
Q1
9.76%
Min
0.00%

SAIA has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

AME vs. SAIA: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Industrial - Machinery and Trucking industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAMESAIA
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.64%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)18.74%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

AME

29.98

Industrial - Machinery Industry

Max
47.62
Q3
34.41
Median
27.36
Q1
21.62
Min
10.96

AME’s P/E Ratio of 29.98 is within the middle range for the Industrial - Machinery industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

SAIA

24.52

Trucking Industry

Max
48.87
Q3
44.85
Median
26.67
Q1
17.49
Min
8.11

SAIA’s P/E Ratio of 24.52 is within the middle range for the Trucking industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

AME vs. SAIA: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Industrial - Machinery and Trucking industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

AME

4.01

Industrial - Machinery Industry

Max
6.15
Q3
3.53
Median
2.82
Q1
1.71
Min
0.09

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Industrial - Machinery industry.

SAIA

1.22

Trucking Industry

Max
1.65
Q3
1.08
Median
0.80
Q1
0.63
Min
0.14

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Trucking industry.

AME vs. SAIA: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Industrial - Machinery and Trucking industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

AME

6.13

Industrial - Machinery Industry

Max
8.37
Q3
4.59
Median
3.34
Q1
1.83
Min
0.32

AME’s P/S Ratio of 6.13 is in the upper echelon for the Industrial - Machinery industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

SAIA

2.42

Trucking Industry

Max
1.13
Q3
1.02
Median
0.75
Q1
0.57
Min
0.39

With a P/S Ratio of 2.42, SAIA trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Trucking industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

AME vs. SAIA: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Industrial - Machinery and Trucking industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

AME

4.26

Industrial - Machinery Industry

Max
7.49
Q3
5.01
Median
3.41
Q1
2.45
Min
0.01

AME’s P/B Ratio of 4.26 is within the conventional range for the Industrial - Machinery industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

SAIA

3.34

Trucking Industry

Max
3.14
Q3
1.98
Median
1.41
Q1
1.15
Min
0.84

At 3.34, SAIA’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Trucking industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

AME vs. SAIA: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Industrial - Machinery and Trucking industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAMESAIA
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)29.9824.52
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)4.011.22
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)6.132.42
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)4.263.34
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)24.82-38.68
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)21.0012.59
EV-to-Sales (TTM)6.352.55