AME vs. ROK: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AME and ROK, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
With AME at 41.02 billion USD and ROK at 34.01 billion USD, their market capitalizations sit in the same ballpark.
With betas of 1.12 for AME and 1.32 for ROK, both show similar volatility profiles relative to the overall market.
| Symbol | AME | ROK |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | AMETEK, Inc. | Rockwell Automation, Inc. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| Industry | Industrial - Machinery | Industrial - Machinery |
| CEO | Mr. David A. Zapico | Mr. Blake D. Moret |
| Price | 177.68 USD | 301.77 USD |
| Market Cap | 41.02 billion USD | 34.01 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.12 | 1.32 |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| IPO Date | July 19, 1984 | December 31, 1981 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AME and ROK over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
For a detailed comparison of valuation metrics between AME and ROK, please refer to the table below.
| Symbol | AME | ROK |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 28.93 | 37.56 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 3.87 | 2.64 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 5.91 | 4.27 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 4.11 | 9.91 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 23.94 | 31.80 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 20.29 | 23.81 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 6.13 | 4.73 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 24.83 | 35.20 |
Dividend Comparison
ROK stands out with a 1.72% dividend yield—around 165% above AME’s 0.65%—highlighting its emphasis on generous payouts.
| Symbol | AME | ROK |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.65% | 1.72% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of AME and ROK, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- ROK posts a quick ratio of 0.72, indicating limited coverage of short-term debts from its most liquid assets—while AME at 0.86 enjoys stronger liquidity resilience.
| Symbol | AME | ROK |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 1.41 | 1.05 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.86 | 0.72 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.19 | 1.19 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.13 | 0.37 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 23.38 | 7.79 |