Seek Returns logo

AME vs. PWR: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AME and PWR, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolAMEPWR
Company NameAMETEK, Inc.Quanta Services, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryElectrical EquipmentConstruction & Engineering
Market Capitalization42.34 billion USD56.01 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJuly 19, 1984February 12, 1998
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AME and PWR by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AME vs. PWR: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolAMEPWR
5-Day Price Return-0.91%-0.43%
13-Week Price Return1.34%9.04%
26-Week Price Return-0.16%29.23%
52-Week Price Return13.84%40.20%
Month-to-Date Return0.19%-7.45%
Year-to-Date Return2.74%18.93%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.13M1.00M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.34M1.19M
3-Month Volatility17.75%22.91%
Beta1.131.06

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

AME

14.53%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
37.56%
Q3
20.60%
Median
14.38%
Q1
4.35%
Min
0.90%

AME’s Return on Equity of 14.53% is on par with the norm for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

PWR

13.09%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
29.61%
Q3
17.18%
Median
10.42%
Q1
8.10%
Min
-0.10%

PWR’s Return on Equity of 13.09% is on par with the norm for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

AME vs. PWR: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

AME

20.60%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
20.43%
Q3
10.97%
Median
6.07%
Q1
3.16%
Min
0.29%

AME’s Net Profit Margin of 20.60% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Electrical Equipment industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

PWR

3.73%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
11.14%
Q3
6.17%
Median
3.85%
Q1
2.40%
Min
-0.05%

PWR’s Net Profit Margin of 3.73% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

AME vs. PWR: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

AME

26.24%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
26.20%
Q3
14.31%
Median
7.54%
Q1
3.77%
Min
-5.64%

AME’s Operating Profit Margin of 26.24% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Electrical Equipment industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

PWR

5.73%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
17.56%
Q3
9.36%
Median
5.46%
Q1
3.47%
Min
-1.93%

PWR’s Operating Profit Margin of 5.73% is around the midpoint for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

AME vs. PWR: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAMEPWR
Return on Equity (TTM)14.53%13.09%
Return on Assets (TTM)9.66%5.08%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)20.60%3.73%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)26.24%5.73%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)36.12%15.04%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

AME

1.63

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
3.02
Q3
1.99
Median
1.41
Q1
1.07
Min
0.80

AME’s Current Ratio of 1.63 aligns with the median group of the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

PWR

1.37

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
1.98
Q3
1.53
Median
1.24
Q1
1.05
Min
0.66

PWR’s Current Ratio of 1.37 aligns with the median group of the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

AME vs. PWR: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

AME

0.19

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
1.44
Q3
0.99
Median
0.56
Q1
0.24
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry, AME’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.19 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

PWR

0.60

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.49
Q3
1.19
Median
0.63
Q1
0.29
Min
0.00

PWR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.60 is typical for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

AME vs. PWR: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

AME

15.71

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
36.12
Q3
19.29
Median
9.38
Q1
1.16
Min
-10.92

AME’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 15.71 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

PWR

10.76

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
23.59
Q3
14.49
Median
8.20
Q1
5.26
Min
-6.49

PWR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 10.76 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

AME vs. PWR: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAMEPWR
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.631.37
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.041.24
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.190.60
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)15.7110.76

Growth

Revenue Growth

AME vs. PWR: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

AME vs. PWR: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

AME

0.64%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
2.20%
Q3
1.53%
Median
1.01%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AME’s Dividend Yield of 0.64% is consistent with its peers in the Electrical Equipment industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

PWR

0.10%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
6.28%
Q3
3.25%
Median
2.02%
Q1
0.23%
Min
0.00%

PWR’s Dividend Yield of 0.10% is in the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

AME vs. PWR: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

AME

18.94%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
119.44%
Q3
51.87%
Median
27.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AME’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 18.94% is within the typical range for the Electrical Equipment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

PWR

5.92%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
139.17%
Q3
69.47%
Median
40.99%
Q1
10.51%
Min
0.00%

PWR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 5.92% is in the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

AME vs. PWR: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAMEPWR
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.64%0.10%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)18.94%5.92%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

AME

29.53

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
81.85
Q3
44.17
Median
27.61
Q1
18.62
Min
7.73

AME’s P/E Ratio of 29.53 is within the middle range for the Electrical Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

PWR

57.10

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
36.96
Q3
24.81
Median
15.45
Q1
12.51
Min
2.74

At 57.10, PWR’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

AME vs. PWR: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

AME

6.08

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
8.18
Q3
4.02
Median
1.84
Q1
0.97
Min
0.44

AME’s P/S Ratio of 6.08 is in the upper echelon for the Electrical Equipment industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

PWR

2.13

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
3.22
Q3
1.63
Median
0.61
Q1
0.48
Min
0.11

PWR’s P/S Ratio of 2.13 is in the upper echelon for the Construction & Engineering industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

AME vs. PWR: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

AME

4.02

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
8.50
Q3
4.53
Median
3.39
Q1
1.70
Min
0.51

AME’s P/B Ratio of 4.02 is within the conventional range for the Electrical Equipment industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

PWR

7.13

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
5.74
Q3
3.33
Median
1.49
Q1
1.20
Min
0.23

At 7.13, PWR’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Construction & Engineering industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

AME vs. PWR: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAMEPWR
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)29.5357.10
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)6.082.13
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)4.027.13
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)25.2240.85