AME vs. PONY: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AME and PONY, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
AME dominates in value with a market cap of 41.02 billion USD, eclipsing PONY’s 6.25 billion USD by roughly 6.57×.
PONY carries a higher beta at 4.02, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while AME remains steadier at 1.12.
Symbol | AME | PONY |
---|---|---|
Company Name | AMETEK, Inc. | Pony AI Inc. American Depositary Shares |
Country | US | CN |
Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
Industry | Industrial - Machinery | Rental & Leasing Services |
CEO | Mr. David A. Zapico | Dr. Jun Peng |
Price | 177.68 USD | 17.29 USD |
Market Cap | 41.02 billion USD | 6.25 billion USD |
Beta | 1.12 | 4.02 |
Exchange | NYSE | NASDAQ |
IPO Date | July 19, 1984 | Invalid Date |
ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AME and PONY over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of AME and PONY based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- PONY shows a negative P/E of -12.16, highlighting a year of losses, whereas AME at 28.93 trades on solid profitability.
- PONY shows a negative forward PEG of -0.44, signaling expected earnings contraction, while AME at 3.87 maintains analysts’ projections for stable or improved profits.
- PONY reports a negative Price-to-Free Cash Flow ratio of -70.25, showing a cash flow shortfall that could threaten its operational sustainability, while AME at 23.94 maintains positive cash flow.
Symbol | AME | PONY |
---|---|---|
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 28.93 | -12.16 |
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 3.87 | -0.44 |
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 5.91 | 114.56 |
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 4.11 | 3.31 |
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 23.94 | -70.25 |
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 20.29 | -20.65 |
EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 6.13 | 104.98 |
EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 24.83 | -64.37 |
Dividend Comparison
AME delivers a 0.65% dividend yield, blending income with growth, whereas PONY appears to retain its profits, possibly to fund operations, R&D, or other growth initiatives.
Symbol | AME | PONY |
---|---|---|
Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.65% | 0.00% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of AME and PONY, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- AME meets its interest obligations (ratio 23.38). In stark contrast, PONY’s negative ratio (-48.96) means its operating earnings (EBIT) don't cover basic operations, let alone interest, signaling serious financial trouble.
Symbol | AME | PONY |
---|---|---|
Current Ratio (TTM) | 1.41 | 11.77 |
Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.86 | 11.77 |
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.19 | 0.01 |
Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.13 | 0.01 |
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 23.38 | -48.96 |