AME vs. PAC: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on August 24, 2025

Here’s a clear look at AME and PAC, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

AME is a standard domestic listing, while PAC trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

Symbol	AME	PAC
Company Name	AMETEK, Inc.	Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V.
Country	United States	Mexico
GICS Sector	Industrials	Industrials
GICS Industry	Electrical Equipment	Transportation Infrastructure
Market Capitalization	42.34 billion USD	12.69 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	July 19, 1984	February 27, 2006
Security Type	Common Stock	ADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AME and PAC by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AME vs. PAC: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	AME	PAC
5-Day Price Return	-0.91%	3.66%
13-Week Price Return	1.34%	7.17%
26-Week Price Return	-0.16%	16.49%
52-Week Price Return	13.84%	54.81%
Month-to-Date Return	0.19%	9.23%
Year-to-Date Return	2.74%	29.15%
10-Day Avg. Volume	1.13M	0.45M
3-Month Avg. Volume	1.34M	0.70M
3-Month Volatility	17.75%	24.85%
Beta	1.13	1.41

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

AME

14.53%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max: 37.56%
Q3: 20.60%
Median: 14.38%
Q1: 4.35%
Min: 0.90%

AME’s Return on Equity of 14.53% is on par with the norm for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

PAC

42.80%

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max: 26.85%
Q3: 15.47%
Median: 10.39%
Q1: 7.70%
Min: 0.79%

PAC’s Return on Equity of 42.80% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Transportation Infrastructure industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

AME vs. PAC: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

AME

20.60%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max: 20.43%
Q3: 10.97%
Median: 6.07%
Q1: 3.16%
Min: 0.29%

AME’s Net Profit Margin of 20.60% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Electrical Equipment industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

PAC

23.19%

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max: 49.26%
Q3: 27.75%
Median: 17.98%
Q1: 10.18%
Min: 4.19%

PAC’s Net Profit Margin of 23.19% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Transportation Infrastructure industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

AME vs. PAC: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

AME

26.24%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max: 26.20%
Q3: 14.31%
Median: 7.54%
Q1: 3.77%
Min: -5.64%

AME’s Operating Profit Margin of 26.24% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Electrical Equipment industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

PAC

42.29%

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max: 60.91%
Q3: 43.57%
Median: 30.58%
Q1: 16.77%
Min: 1.18%

PAC’s Operating Profit Margin of 42.29% is around the midpoint for the Transportation Infrastructure industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

AME vs. PAC: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	AME	PAC
Return on Equity (TTM)	14.53%	42.80%
Return on Assets (TTM)	9.66%	11.42%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	20.60%	23.19%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	26.24%	42.29%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	36.12%	100.00%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

AME

1.63

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max: 3.02
Q3: 1.99
Median: 1.41
Q1: 1.07
Min: 0.80

AME’s Current Ratio of 1.63 aligns with the median group of the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

PAC

0.93

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max: 3.35
Q3: 1.90
Median: 1.35
Q1: 0.86
Min: 0.28

PAC’s Current Ratio of 0.93 aligns with the median group of the Transportation Infrastructure industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

AME vs. PAC: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

AME

0.19

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max: 1.44
Q3: 0.99
Median: 0.56
Q1: 0.24
Min: 0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry, AME’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.19 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

PAC

2.48

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max: 3.70
Q3: 1.70
Median: 0.83
Q1: 0.30
Min: 0.04

PAC’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Transportation Infrastructure industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.48. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

AME vs. PAC: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

AME

15.71

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max: 36.12
Q3: 19.29
Median: 9.38
Q1: 1.16
Min: -10.92

AME’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 15.71 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

PAC

5.20

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max: 29.26
Q3: 20.33
Median: 8.92
Q1: 5.22
Min: 2.01

In the lower quartile for the Transportation Infrastructure industry, PAC’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.20 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

AME vs. PAC: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	AME	PAC
Current Ratio (MRQ)	1.63	0.93
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	1.04	0.93
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	0.19	2.48
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	15.71	5.20

Growth

Revenue Growth

AME vs. PAC: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

AME vs. PAC: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

AME

0.64%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max: 2.20%
Q3: 1.53%
Median: 1.01%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

AME’s Dividend Yield of 0.64% is consistent with its peers in the Electrical Equipment industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

PAC

2.53%

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max: 7.48%
Q3: 3.76%
Median: 2.40%
Q1: 1.13%
Min: 0.00%

PAC’s Dividend Yield of 2.53% is consistent with its peers in the Transportation Infrastructure industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

AME vs. PAC: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

AME

18.94%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max: 119.44%
Q3: 51.87%
Median: 27.71%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

AME’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 18.94% is within the typical range for the Electrical Equipment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

PAC

71.16%

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max: 197.82%
Q3: 109.11%
Median: 70.69%
Q1: 33.40%
Min: 0.00%

PAC’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 71.16% is within the typical range for the Transportation Infrastructure industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

AME vs. PAC: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	AME	PAC
Dividend Yield (TTM)	0.64%	2.53%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	18.94%	71.16%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

AME

29.53

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max: 81.85
Q3: 44.17
Median: 27.61
Q1: 18.62
Min: 7.73

AME’s P/E Ratio of 29.53 is within the middle range for the Electrical Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

PAC

19.76

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max: 35.90
Q3: 21.76
Median: 17.41
Q1: 12.31
Min: 5.46

PAC’s P/E Ratio of 19.76 is within the middle range for the Transportation Infrastructure industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

AME vs. PAC: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

AME

6.08

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max: 8.18
Q3: 4.02
Median: 1.84
Q1: 0.97
Min: 0.44

AME’s P/S Ratio of 6.08 is in the upper echelon for the Electrical Equipment industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

PAC

4.58

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max: 10.76
Q3: 5.52
Median: 2.96
Q1: 1.59
Min: 0.84

PAC’s P/S Ratio of 4.58 aligns with the market consensus for the Transportation Infrastructure industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

AME vs. PAC: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

AME

4.02

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max: 8.50
Q3: 4.53
Median: 3.39
Q1: 1.70
Min: 0.51

AME’s P/B Ratio of 4.02 is within the conventional range for the Electrical Equipment industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

PAC

9.90

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max: 4.46
Q3: 2.80
Median: 1.80
Q1: 1.12
Min: 0.37

At 9.90, PAC’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Transportation Infrastructure industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

AME vs. PAC: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	AME	PAC
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	29.53	19.76
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	6.08	4.58
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	4.02	9.90
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	25.22	18.23