AME vs. NOC: AMETEK vs. Northrop Grumman Stock Comparison
How do AMETEK (AME) and Northrop Grumman (NOC) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
AMETEK (AME) and Northrop Grumman (NOC) both fall under the Capital Goods industry group, but AME is classified in Electrical Equipment while NOC is classified in Aerospace & Defense.
| Profile Item | AME | NOC |
|---|---|---|
| Name | AMETEK, Inc. | Northrop Grumman Corporation |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| GICS Industry Group | Capital Goods | Capital Goods |
| GICS Industry | Electrical Equipment | Aerospace & Defense |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Electrical Components & Equipment | Aerospace & Defense |
| Market Capitalization | 52.44 billion USD | 74.59 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | July 19, 1984 | December 31, 1981 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | AME | NOC |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 22.79% | -3.34% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 18.31% | 7.23% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 12.17% | 9.98% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
Northrop Grumman (NOC) reports a negative beta of -0.12, suggesting inverse market sensitivity over the measurement window. That is uncommon for ordinary equities and can reflect commodity-linked or hedge-like exposure, but it can also come from statistical noise. AMETEK (AME) has a non-negative beta of 0.96.
| Metric | AME | NOC |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 24.96% | 28.86% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.96 | -0.12 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -27.06% | -37.80% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 1.45M | 902.47K |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | AME | NOC |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 0.74 | -0.26 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 1.06 | -0.37 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 26.07% sits in the top ROE quartile, while AMETEK (AME) at 14.68% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for NOC.
AME
Capital Goods industry group
14.68%
- Max
- 40.55%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- AME
- 14.68%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
NOC
Capital Goods industry group
26.07%
- Max
- 40.55%
- NOC
- 26.07%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
Net Margin (TTM)
AMETEK (AME) at 19.91% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 10.37%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.
AME
Capital Goods industry group
19.91%
- Max
- 27.47%
- AME
- 19.91%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
NOC
Capital Goods industry group
10.37%
- Max
- 27.47%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- NOC
- 10.37%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
Operating Margin (TTM)
AMETEK (AME) at 26.38% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 12.91%, which runs around its industry’s norm.
AME
Capital Goods industry group
26.38%
- Max
- 36.60%
- AME
- 26.38%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
NOC
Capital Goods industry group
12.91%
- Max
- 36.60%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- NOC
- 12.91%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | AME | NOC |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 14.68% | 26.07% |
| ROA (TTM) | 7.06% | 7.11% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 19.91% | 10.37% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 26.38% | 12.91% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 36.97% | 20.03% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both AMETEK (AME) at 6.63% and Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 2.24% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
EPS Growth
Both AMETEK (AME) at 7.93% and Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 2.61% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | AME | NOC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 6.63% | 2.24% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 6.36% | 4.65% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 7.93% | 2.61% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 8.50% | -2.60% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
AMETEK (AME) at 1.43 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 1.23 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for NOC.
AME
Capital Goods industry group
1.43
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- AME
- 1.43
- Q1
- 1.43
- Min
- 0.36
NOC
Capital Goods industry group
1.23
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- NOC
- 1.23
- Min
- 0.36
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Both AMETEK (AME) at 0.60 and Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 0.93 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.
AME
Capital Goods industry group
0.60
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- AME
- 0.60
- Median
- 0.60
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
NOC
Capital Goods industry group
0.93
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- NOC
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.60
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | AME | NOC |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.43 | 1.23 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.60 | 0.93 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 2.41 | 1.87 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 1.82% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while AMETEK (AME) at 0.60% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, NOC the richer one.
AME
Capital Goods industry group
0.60%
- Max
- 2.66%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- AME
- 0.60%
- Median
- 0.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
NOC
Capital Goods industry group
1.82%
- Max
- 2.66%
- NOC
- 1.82%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- Median
- 0.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
AMETEK (AME) at 18.76% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 30.18% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.
AME
Capital Goods industry group
18.76%
- Max
- 67.39%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- AME
- 18.76%
- Median
- 6.86%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
NOC
Capital Goods industry group
30.18%
- Max
- 67.39%
- NOC
- 30.18%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | AME | NOC |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.60% | 1.82% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 18.76% | 30.18% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 16.57 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while AMETEK (AME) at 32.25 is closer to its industry’s usual earnings multiple — a discount for NOC, though growth and earnings durability still matter.
AME
Capital Goods industry group
32.25
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- AME
- 32.25
- Median
- 25.41
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
NOC
Capital Goods industry group
16.57
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- Median
- 25.41
- Q1
- 19.47
- NOC
- 16.57
- Min
- 3.03
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 1.71 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while AMETEK (AME) at 6.40 sits in the pricier quartile — AME costs more per dollar of sales.
AME
Capital Goods industry group
6.40
- Max
- 7.54
- AME
- 6.40
- Q3
- 3.76
- Median
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
NOC
Capital Goods industry group
1.71
- Max
- 7.54
- Q3
- 3.76
- Median
- 2.15
- NOC
- 1.71
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
On P/B ratio, both AMETEK (AME) at 4.48 and Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 3.99 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.
AME
Capital Goods industry group
4.48
- Max
- 9.66
- Q3
- 5.00
- AME
- 4.48
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
NOC
Capital Goods industry group
3.99
- Max
- 9.66
- Q3
- 5.00
- NOC
- 3.99
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | AME | NOC |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 32.25 | 16.57 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 6.40 | 1.71 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 4.48 | 3.99 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 2.89% | 4.21% |